Bad feelings, redundancies and defaced posters.

[LagosBen]

Members are reminded that it is contrary to forum rules to import material from outside this forum with the sole intention of harassing or haranguing fellow members.  I will take no action on this occasion except to remove the offending posts but be warned that this will no longer be tolerated.

No exceptions! 

http://miscarriageofjustice.co/index.php?topic=485.0

This thread is about the defacing of posters therefore I'm not sure why you don't like my post  8-)(--)

[Admin]

In which case, without the benefit or permission to bring the evidence here, I will repeat that I think the people like the Luz who posted that despicable comment on another forum is a vicious nasty s..mbag as are all other posters who post such evil comments regarding the disappearance of a missing little girl and the parents'/police actions to find that child.

And I repeat my question, is such vicious nastiness (as evidenced by the stream of such comments on other forums, confined to anti McCanns or is there also a stream of such evidence that Pro McCanns have behaved in the same way?

Anyone in my view who seeks to viciously damage the search for a missing little girl is beneath contempt and the more such evil people are exposed on forums and in the media the better for society. I regret that admin apparently don't agree that in this case the bringing here of such evidence of malicious comments is worthwhile.

Is there any evidence that the Luz you refer to did anything other than boast of his or her efforts on a forum?    I for one find it hard to believe that this person single-handedly managed to destroyed the 10,000 posters referred to by Mr Michael Wright while testifying last Friday at the Tribunal in Lisbon.

[gilet]

Is there any evidence that the Luz you refer to did anything other than boast of his or her efforts on a forum?    I for one find it hard to believe that this person single-handedly managed to destroyed the 10,000 posters referred to by Mr Michael Wright while testifying last Friday at the Tribunal in Lisbon.

No evidence whatsoever that I am aware of that this particular Luz did what he claimed. But someone did damage posters in PDL.

However I would expand my point and explain that I think anyone who countenances or expresses the idea that such activity is a good idea in the case of a missing little girl is a despicable s..mbag? Would you agree?

[LagosBen]

She was the only one from memory boasting about it on forums that I saw at the time...then it happened so decide for yourself whether she was involved or not.

[Admin]

No evidence whatsoever that I am aware of that this particular Luz did what he claimed. But someone did damage posters in PDL.

However I would expand my point and explain that I think anyone who countenances or expresses the idea that such activity is a good idea in the case of a missing little girl is a despicable s..mbag? Would you agree?

Most definitely Gilet.  I was shocked as much as you to learn the numbers involved in the Praia da Luz area.

[sadie]

The clue is in the 'with the sole intention of harassing or haranguing fellow members' bit Sadie.

Admin, with all due respect, that is not correct.  It is very one sided.

The [ censored word ]s/sceptics regularly bring stuff from other forums/blogs with the express purpose of harrassing and haranging fellow members of the Pro inclination. 

Undoubtedly also with the express purpose of putting out disinformation / propaganda against the Mccanns and the Tapas group.  This has been allowed since the forum started.


If the [ censored word ]s can do it, why cant the pros ?  Perhaps some changes should take place for a more level playing field?

[Admin]

Admin, with all due respect, that is not correct.  It is very one sided.

The [ censored word ]s/sceptics regularly bring stuff from other forums/blogs with the express purpose of harrassing and haranging fellow members of the Pro inclination.

Undoubtedly also with the express purpose of putting out disinformation / propaganda against the Mccanns and the Tapas group.  This has been allowed since the forum started.


If the [ censored word ]s can do it, why cant the pros ?  Perhaps some changes should take place for a more level playing field?

You are wrong Sadie.  If you have an example of what you claim however we would be pleased to see it.

[sadie]

Is there any evidence that the Luz you refer to did anything other than boast of his or her efforts on a forum?    I for one find it hard to believe that this person single-handedly managed to destroyed the 10,000 posters referred to by Mr Michael Wright while testifying last Friday at the Tribunal in Lisbon.

Sorry Admin, but POOF  !

S/he probably wasn't the only one, but she did it and bragged about it.


Sheer hatred and malice .... Luz, a low-l^fe who tore down and threw paint all over posters put up to try and find a stolen little girl.  Specifically the phone number and contact address had been destroyed

Hmmm?  >@@(*&)

FGS. What had Madeleine done to deserve that?  Why was that done?  THere has to be a reason.

Luz ?

[Carana]

I doubt that it was just one person who went around tearing down posters unless that person was on a personal rampage. A small group, perhaps?

[sadie]

No evidence whatsoever that I am aware of that this particular Luz did what he claimed. But someone did damage posters in PDL.

However I would expand my point and explain that I think anyone who countenances or expresses the idea that such activity is a good idea in the case of a missing little girl is a despicable s..mbag? Would you agree?

There is evidence gilet and it has been posted on here by DCI, but Admin / mods in their wisdom took the evidence down.  Others will have it too and many of us saw the original boasts from Luz.

Commented on by Sykes also.


She not only tore down the posters thru Madeleines face, but also splashed paint all over the investigators telephone number and contact details ... to prevent anyone giving information to help find her

To prevent anyone giving information to help find her.  Why?  There has to be a reason.,  Hmmm?  >@@(*&)

What a despicable way to treat a little girl who had been stolen from her parents. 
And the sceptics/[ censored word ]s here claim that they are taking their stance for Madeleine ... Yeah, Right!


I agree totally with your word s..mbag, but I was politer calling her a toerag, for which I received 15 bad points and have just received a threat of banning.  Maybe you all have, but it was timed for me

[Admin]

There is evidence gilet and it has been posted on here by DCI, but Admin / mods in their wisdom took the evidence down.  Others will have it too and many of us saw the original boasts from Luz.

Commented on by Sykes also.


She not only tore down the posters thru Madeleines face, but also splashed paint all over the investigators telephone number and contact details ... to prevent anyone giving information to help find her

To prevent anyone giving information to help find her.  Why?  There has to be a reason.,  Hmmm?  >@@(*&)

What a despicable way to treat a little girl who had been stolen from her parents. 
And the sceptics/[ censored word ]s here claim that they are taking their stance for Madeleine ... Yeah, Right!


I agree totally with your word s..mbag, but I was politer calling her a toerag, for which I received 15 bad points and have just received a threat of banning.  Maybe you all have, but it was timed for me

Sadie.   For the last time, boasting about doing something on a forum is not evidence that they did it.  Please desist.

[Angelo222]

Sadie.   For the last time, boasting about doing something on a forum is not evidence that they did it.  Please desist.

tut tut and its only Monday Sadie!!   

[gilet]

Well we know some posters were damaged.

So what was the purpose?

Was it to prevent information being given about the case?

Or was it simply because there were a number of sick individuals who could not bear to see attention being given to a missing little girl (maybe because she was not Portuguese)?

[Angelo222]

Well we know some posters were damaged.

So what was the purpose?

Was it to prevent information being given about the case?

Or was it simply because there were a number of sick individuals who could not bear to see attention being given to a missing little girl (maybe because she was not Portuguese)?

Its a strange old world, the publicity generated by the defaced posters then and the libel case now is free publicity money couldn't pay for.   

[gilet]

Its a strange old world, the publicity generated by the defaced posters then and the libel case now is free publicity money couldn't pay for.   

Cynicism of that nature gets you nowhere in the long run.

I suppose you think the McCanns paid all those Portuguese people to comment at the time of the posters.