Author Topic: 'Anti-McCann' websites plotted to kidnap one of Madeleine's siblings Read more:  (Read 26440 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

C.Edwards

  • Guest
I don't know how people who post nasty things about Kate and Gerry McCann on the internet live with themselves, personally. We've seen from Mr Wright's testimony how much pain and devastation they have caused.

I don't see how people who post nasty things about Goncalo Amaral live with themselves. We've seen for ourselves (and not just heard 3rd party hearsay from a hired mouthpiece) the devastation it has caused him and his family.

The McCanns courting of the media (when it suits them) makes them fair game for criticism. They are, in my eyes, unfit parents and, judging by all that I've seen written by them and broadcast by them, thoroughly nasty pieces of work.  "F**king tossers" one might even say. 

You reap what you sow and it's just about harvest time.

Rachel Granada

  • Guest
I don't see how people who post nasty things about Goncalo Amaral live with themselves. We've seen for ourselves (and not just heard 3rd party hearsay from a hired mouthpiece) the devastation it has caused him and his family.

The McCanns courting of the media (when it suits them) makes them fair game for criticism. They are, in my eyes, unfit parents and, judging by all that I've seen written by them and broadcast by them, thoroughly nasty pieces of work.  "F**king tossers" one might even say. 

You reap what you sow and it's just about harvest time.

"We plough the fields and scatter the good seed on the land..."

By "nasty things" do you mean the truth C Edwards?  A proven liar - a corrupt cop who tried to swindle his own brother, who then tried to line his own pockets by writing a book about a couple he had never even met?

That is all the truth.

C.Edwards

  • Guest
"We plough the fields and scatter the good seed on the land..."

By "nasty things" do you mean the truth C Edwards?  A proven liar - a corrupt cop who tried to swindle his own brother, who then tried to line his own pockets by writing a book about a couple he had never even met?

That is all the truth.

Oh god... and meanwhile the saintly parents were writing books to make profit from their own calamitous parenting so of course that's just fine.  Amaral's personal problems - even if they are more than figments of the Pros' imaginations - make no difference whatsoever to his policing capabilities.

stephen25000

  • Guest
Oh god... and meanwhile the saintly parents were writing books to make profit from their own calamitous parenting so of course that's just fine.  Amaral's personal problems - even if they are more than figments of the Pros' imaginations - make no difference whatsoever to his policing capabilities.

 8@??)( 8@??)( 8@??)(

You've got it in one.

The 'supporters' hate Amaral and will say anything to try and cast a negative light on him, regardless of the fact that most of the PJ viewed the case the same as him

Redblossom

  • Guest
Re: 'Anti-McCann' websites plotted to kidnap one of Madeleine's siblings Read m
« Reply #19 on: September 21, 2013, 07:35:05 PM »
The fact remains that the Mccanns (Wright) are scraping a very big dirty barrel by trying  to lay blame on Mr Amaral for one or two nutters  on the world wide web.... posting on a forum what was in their head.... Its plainly just laughable

Its like suing the writers of the Bible for christian fundamentalist terrorists activities
 @)(++(*


Rachel Granada

  • Guest
Oh god... and meanwhile the saintly parents were writing books to make profit from their own calamitous parenting so of course that's just fine.  Amaral's personal problems - even if they are more than figments of the Pros' imaginations - make no difference whatsoever to his policing capabilities.

I wouldn't call a conviction for perjury a personal problem.

His policing capabilities - hmmm.... didn't know much about forensics, did he?

And as for the McCanns making a profit, it all went into the fund to find Madeleine.  Not into their own pockets, like Amaral.

Offline sadie

I don't see how people who post nasty things about Goncalo Amaral live with themselves. We've seen for ourselves (and not just heard 3rd party hearsay from a hired mouthpiece) the devastation it has caused him and his family.

The McCanns courting of the media (when it suits them) makes them fair game for criticism. They are, in my eyes, unfit parents and, judging by all that I've seen written by them and broadcast by them, thoroughly nasty pieces of work.  "F**king tossers" one might even say. 

You reap what you sow and it's just about harvest time.
Dont go on about Amaral and what he has lost FGS

He lost his wife and marriage ... so some bleat.

Well he was knocking off another woman
- He threatened the husband of his mistress with a bullet thru the head
- He made suggestions / threats that something might happen to their child.  Threats to a child !
- He got involved in a brawl with Marcos Corriera.  Was he wearing his diamond earring at the time?

- He didn't even get a send off when he retired/ was pushed from the PJ.  Bet they were glad to see him go.
- He swindled his brother out of thousands of Euros

- He was driving his daughter while drunk according to his wife
- He used to stay behind for long hours wining and dining with his mates according to contemporary reports.  Went home when he felt like it
- He renagued on the agreement about his wife having their daughter over the Christmas period


- He wrote a book on the back of a missing child.  Did it whilst he was still a serving officer.  A book full of exagerations and bitterness against the Mccanns.   A book that has near destroyed a good woman ... and her family
- He was an arguido himself and subsequently was found guilty of perjury.  Eighteen months sentence; he was very lucky not to go to jail imo

Any devastation to his family was cause by GONCALO AMARAL himself.  What a low life.!

C.Edwards

  • Guest
I wouldn't call a conviction for perjury a personal problem.

His policing capabilities - hmmm.... didn't know much about forensics, did he?

And as for the McCanns making a profit, it all went into the fund to find Madeleine.  Not into their own pockets, like Amaral.

Oh my. It's like trying to argue with a creationist. OK, I know where you stand. You can be added to the list of those who it's not worth trying to debate with.  8((()*/

C.Edwards

  • Guest

Any devastation to his family was cause by GONCALO AMARAL himself.  What a low life.!

Any devastation to their family was caused by the McCanns themselves!  What low lives!

stephen25000

  • Guest
Any devastation to their family was caused by the McCanns themselves!  What low lives!

precisely.

The Mccanns chose to do what they did, so they could go out to drink and eat, without paying even the most basic redress to childcare, and Madeleine paid the price.

Redblossom

  • Guest
Re: 'Anti-McCann' websites plotted to kidnap one of Madeleine's siblings Read m
« Reply #25 on: September 21, 2013, 08:17:24 PM »
precisely.

The Mccanns chose to do what they did, so they could go out to drink and eat, without paying even the most basic redress to childcare, and Madeleine paid the price.

you forget kate mccann blames

The restaraunt staff for leaving some note out visible to passing people alledgedly sayinf the tapas group were leaving their kids alone and needed the tapas bookings every night
And
 
mark warner did not have iron bars on all the windows!

stephen25000

  • Guest
I wouldn't call a conviction for perjury a personal problem.

His policing capabilities - hmmm.... didn't know much about forensics, did he?

And as for the McCanns making a profit, it all went into the fund to find Madeleine.  Not into their own pockets, like Amaral.

' it all went into the fund to find Madeleine '

Now precisely how much of that money has been used to 'search' for Madeleine exactly ?

Precise figures please, not cliches.

Rachel Granada

  • Guest
Oh my. It's like trying to argue with a creationist. OK, I know where you stand. You can be added to the list of those who it's not worth trying to debate with.  8((()*/

LOL!  Runs a mile when "difficult" facts are presented....


stephen25000

  • Guest
LOL!  Runs a mile when "difficult" facts are presented....

On that you should read my previous post.  8)-)))

Rachel Granada

  • Guest
On that you should read my previous post.  8)-)))

Are you speaking for C Edwards, Stephen?  It was CE who swerved the unpalatable questions, not you.