Gonçalo Amaral's wife writes to Kate McCann asking her to tell the truth!!

[gilet]

For goodness' sake. The judge checked the request and admitted it was valid. Stop stamping your foot and crying "unfair" like a petulant schoolgirl.

Valid in law maybe.
Necessary is an entirely different matter.
And whether it was a truly professional action...?

There is nothing petulant about expressing a view that the lawyer could perfectly have easily spoken to his adult child before setting off to the court before doing the work he was supposed to be doing. I am perfectly entitles to express that opinion without you describing me abusively as having been stamping my feet about it.


What is petulant is the posting of Carlymichelle about her need for mummy and daddy to be ever present at the age of 34 and her presumption that the rest of the world should think the same.

[C.Edwards]

There is nothing petulant about expressing a view that the lawyer could perfectly have easily spoken to his adult child before setting off to the court before doing the work he was supposed to be doing. I am perfectly entitles to express that opinion without you describing me abusively as having been stamping my feet about it.

Aha. yes, of course. Not libellous to be describing a lawyer as unprofessional then?

[DCI]

Picking flies out of the way the McCann's dress and look, is a bit silly, if you compare them with this.

Here's an example of Amaral on a day out, with his daughter. I have cut the child off, for her privacy!

[drummer]

That's his court outfit isn't it?

[DCI]

That's his court outfit isn't it?

No, he had black pumps or shoes on, that day, not brown. 

[C.Edwards]

Why do you McCann supporters persist in irrelevancies?  What has his dress sense got to do with this thread? Do you see anyone on this thread mentioning the McCanns' dress sense apart from one of your own?

As to the accusation I was "cherry picking" photos... bear in mind that the McCanns, according to themselves, are suffering permanent depression and/or anxiety and/or hemorrhoids or god knows what else because of Amaral. Why should they ever be in a position to be photographed smiling?

[gilet]

Aha. yes, of course. Not libellous to be describing a lawyer as unprofessional then?

Not at all as the evidence for that is clear. You are correct.

[gilet]

Why do you McCann supporters persist in irrelevancies?  What has his dress sense got to do with this thread? Do you see anyone on this thread mentioning the McCanns' dress sense apart from one of your own?

As to the accusation I was "cherry picking" photos... bear in mind that the McCanns, according to themselves, are suffering permanent depression and/or anxiety and/or hemorrhoids or god knows what else because of Amaral. Why should they ever be in a position to be photographed smiling?

Dear, dear. Such petulance. Have you not read the reams of pages of anti McCann garbage about the dress sense of the McCanns.

And on looking back I see it was you who started all this silly gossip with your cherry-picked photos trying to gossip about whether Kate should never ever smile again in her life or some such inanity. Do you seriously believe that any living person, no matter what the circumstances of their past, should be condemned to a life in which they cannot ever smile again? Do you think the McCanns would be benefiting their twins by being permanently morose?

And could you please offer up the relevant quotes where the McCanns have ever said as you rather nastily claim,  that they"are suffering permanent depression and/or anxiety and/or hemorrhoids or god knows what else"? Until you do show us those quotes we are entitled to presume that is just nasty gossip from you.

[C.Edwards]

Dear, dear. Such petulance. Have you not read the reams of pages of anti McCann garbage about the dress sense of the McCanns.

And on looking back I see it was you who started all this silly gossip with your cherry-picked photos trying to gossip about whether Kate should never ever smile again in her life or some such inanity.

I'm not the one stamping my ruby slipper and bawling "unfair! Mum! Tell him!" or words to that effect.

No, I've read nothing about the McCanns' dress sense. Perhaps you could point out where it is mentioned on this thread?

Try to stay calm. You're repeating "gossip" quite a lot whilst you're ranting. I'm just sticking to the facts. Permanent depression and anxiety doesn't allow people to smile, oddly enough.

[LagosBen]

they clearly are damaged people it shows   by their menacing tone about  GA layers child  it doesnt matyter how old     someones child is  if they are adult or not    they are still that persons child at least they didnt abandon the child like the mcanns no matter how old the person is  as  i   say i wonder if some pros were sent away  as a child they are cold hearted

Sorry but... at both your silly posts.

[drummer]

 Why should they ever be in a position to be photographed smiling?


They do have other children, do you think it's good for them if they don't ever see their parents smiling?

People who suffer depression/anxiety aren't allowed to smile?

[gilet]

I'm not the one stamping my ruby slipper and bawling "unfair! Mum! Tell him!" or words to that effect.

No, I've read nothing about the McCanns' dress sense. Perhaps you could point out where it is mentioned on this thread?

Try to stay calm. You're repeating "gossip" quite a lot whilst you're ranting. I'm just sticking to the facts. Permanent depression and anxiety doesn't allow people to smile, oddly enough.

I have posted no such quote (and nothing similar to that quote) as you wrongly claim.

Ah so I am ranting and you are posting facts when you claim " that the McCanns, according to themselves, are suffering permanent depression and/or anxiety and/or hemorrhoids or god knows what else "?

You really are showing yourself up when you claim such things. Do you not see that?

Please provide the relevant quotes if you wish to be taken seriously and not simply be seen to be being petulant.

And I suggest you are the one who needs to read and post more calmly. Then you would not get confused so much. As in the assertion that I have posted what you mistakenly claim I have posted above and in your assertion that I claimed dress sense had been mentioned previously on this thread.

Calm, down dear and read more carefully. Then you won't make such wrong-headed claims.

[C.Edwards]

Why should they ever be in a position to be photographed smiling?


They do have other children, do you think it's good for them if they don't ever see their parents smiling?

People who suffer depression/anxiety aren't allowed to smile?

Why indeed?  Although I think you've made an error in your post there 

Yeah, yeah. My point is that they seem to be entirely functional people. A long way from the depressed anxious people they claim to be.

Why did they request - or demand - the removal of the "happy smiley faces" photo from Amsterdam from associated reports?  If they are allowed to smile and laugh for whatever reason, why remove that photo?  It's almost like some PR agency was advising them it didn't look good to be seen so happy when they were supposed to be so anxious and depressed.

[LagosBen]

Why should they ever be in a position to be photographed smiling?


They do have other children, do you think it's good for them if they don't ever see their parents smiling?

People who suffer depression/anxiety aren't allowed to smile?

Pretty pathetic isn't it.

Much like the one the [ censored word] pass around of the couple smiling outside the Church and bitch bitch bitch about it. When in fact someone had accidentally let go of balloons and the whole crowd was smiling about it.

I'm pretty sure had the McCanns looked grim faced at the time the [ censored word] would have an even bigger bitchfest about the how those darned McCanns are stuck up and aren't appreciative of supporters.

[gilet]

...

Yeah, yeah. My point is that they seem to be entirely functional people. A long way from the depressed anxious people they claim to be.

Why did they request - or demand - the removal of the "happy smiley faces" photo from Amsterdam from associated reports?  If they are allowed to smile and laugh for whatever reason, why remove that photo?  It's almost like some PR agency was advising them it didn't look good to be seen so happy when they were supposed to be so anxious and depressed.

Rather ironic that you should be pronouncing on the state of mind of this couple who you have never met and who you only know from snippets on the internet of their lives, while elsewhere on this forum posters are damming Mr Pike for his comments about the McCanns when he has professional qualifications relevant to those comments and has spent long periods with the McCanns.

Are you really claiming to be in a better position than him to comment on this couple's state of mind or are you just a typical know-it-all internet anti McCann who thinks he is so clever he can determine such matters over a few forum posts, a few cherry-picked photos and no actual interaction, conversation, or anything else that normally forms the basis of such judgements?