Can we get one thing straight

[Mr Gray]

Scotland Yard have made it clear that they consider that Maddie was abducted by a stranger and that the MCCannns nor their friends are suspects or persons of interest. Scotland Yard are also having regular meetings with the McCanns to keep them updated with the REINVESTIGATION.

[C.Edwards]

Scotland Yard have made it clear that they consider that Maddie was abducted by a stranger and that the MCCannns nor their friends are suspects or persons of interest. Scotland Yard are also having regular meetings with the McCanns to keep them updated with the REINVESTIGATION.

a) that's more than one thing
b) where's your evidence for any of this - particularly the regular meetings part
c) let me just post what I did earlier again as it is particularly relevant here...

Just wondering something out loud here.  If - hypothetically, of course - the parents and/or other members of the group WERE, in fact persons of interest or suspects, what would Redwood have said?  Would he have announced that to the world's media and had the associated furore blow up?  Would he have kept quiet altogether and had the suspicion/innuendo gathering pace (as it would, inevitably, have done) or... and this is just a wild stab here... would he have just said "they're not persons of interest" as he knows that they will be largely left alone for now and SY can get on with whatever they're doing.

If, and again this is entirely hypothetical, they were actually persons of interest and subsequently were investigated/charged/whatever then what are they going to do...? Sue SY for misinformation?

[Mr Gray]

a) that's more than one thing
b) where's your evidence for any of this - particularly the regular meetings part
c) let me just post what I did earlier again as it is particularly relevant here...

Just wondering something out loud here.  If - hypothetically, of course - the parents and/or other members of the group WERE, in fact persons of interest or suspects, what would Redwood have said?  Would he have announced that to the world's media and had the associated furore blow up?  Would he have kept quiet altogether and had the suspicion/innuendo gathering pace (as it would, inevitably, have done) or... and this is just a wild stab here... would he have just said "they're not persons of interest" as he knows that they will be largely left alone for now and SY can get on with whatever they're doing.



If, and again this is entirely hypothetical, they were actually persons of interest and subsequently were investigated/charged/whatever then what are they going to do...? Sue SY for misinformation?

Everything I stated has been said Live by Redwood...the evidence...it was on this forum this afternoon but red deleted her post as she made an absolute fool of herself

[drummer]

 Thought Red had started a thread today claiming the opposite? Seems to have disappeared.
 >@@(*&)

[Rachel Granada]

Scotland Yard have made it clear that they consider that Maddie was abducted by a stranger and that the MCCannns nor their friends are suspects or persons of interest. Scotland Yard are also having regular meetings with the McCanns to keep them updated with the REINVESTIGATION.

Why can people not understand this, dave.  Kate and Gerry McCann and their friends are not persons of interest.

Simple enough, but people will not accept it.

[Rachel Granada]

Thought Red had started a thread today claiming the opposite? Seems to have disappeared.
 >@@(*&)

Yes - where has that thread gone?

[C.Edwards]

Everything I stated has been said Live by Redwood...the evidence...it was on this forum this afternoon but red deleted her post as she made an absolute fool of herself

Doesn't matter.  As my post points out, he's hardly going to say they ARE persons of interest/suspect even if they are, so it renders the whole thing meaningless until resolved. You therefore have no reason to go on about it as it's not yet been resolved and you cannot possibly resolve the quantum state unless you happen to be Redwood. I'm pretty confident you're not.

[faithlilly]

Why can people not understand this, dave.  Kate and Gerry McCann and their friends are not persons of interest.

Simple enough, but people will not accept it.

Which is just what we were told before the McCanns were made arguidos !

[Luz]

Scotland Yard have made it clear that they consider that Maddie was abducted by a stranger and that the MCCannns nor their friends are suspects or persons of interest. Scotland Yard are also having regular meetings with the McCanns to keep them updated with the REINVESTIGATION.

Are you sure of that?
I doubt that any police force in the world would discard the parents without fully investigating them, in a case like this, and would keep them aware of their movements.

[ferryman]

Which is just what we were told before the McCanns were made arguidos !

By a different police force.

UK police do not go out of their way to say that people persons of interest are not persons of interest.

Greg Reardon was commended by police as an exemplary witness in their investigation into the murder of his partner, Joane Yeates.

He was never regarded as a suspect.

Police said it because they meant it ...

[icabodcrane]

Did Scotland Yard ever disclose what new evidence they found that eliminated the McCanns from any possible involvement in their daughter's disappearance  ?

I can only presume that whatever the evidence was,  it had not been found in  July 2008,  this  written statement was presented in court from  the assistant chief constable for  Leicestershire :

"While one or both of them may be innocent,  there is no clear evidence that eliminates them from involvement in Madeleine's disappearance"

 

[ferryman]

Did Scotland Yard ever disclose what new evidence they found that eliminated the McCanns from any possible involvement in their daughter's disappearance  ?

I can only presume that whatever the evidence was,  it had not been found in  July 2008,  this  written statement was presented in court from  the assistant chief constable for  Leicestershire :

"While one or both of them may be innocent,  there is no clear evidence that eliminates them from involvement in Madeleine's disappearance"

New evidence?

None needed (to eliminate the McCanns), they just had to read what the PJ and Portuguese prosecutors had already adduced ...

 

[ferryman]

Did Scotland Yard ever disclose what new evidence they found that eliminated the McCanns from any possible involvement in their daughter's disappearance  ?

I can only presume that whatever the evidence was,  it had not been found in  July 2008,  this  written statement was presented in court from  the assistant chief constable for  Leicestershire :

"While one or both of them may be innocent,  there is no clear evidence that eliminates them from involvement in Madeleine's disappearance"


 

Why do you repeating that canard, made whilst the McCanns were still arguidos?

[Benita]

Scotland Yard have made it clear that they consider that Maddie was abducted by a stranger and that the MCCannns nor their friends are suspects or persons of interest. Scotland Yard are also having regular meetings with the McCanns to keep them updated with the REINVESTIGATION.

yes that's correct 

"NEITHER HER PARENTS OR ANY MEMBER OF THE GROUP THAT WERE WITH HER ARE EITHER PERSONS OF INTEREST OR SUSPECTS." -DCI REDWOOD

[Redblossom]

Everything I stated has been said Live by Redwood...the evidence...it was on this forum this afternoon but red deleted her post as she made an absolute fool of herself

For your information I do not have admin or mod rights to be able to delete threads and as a sole poster cannot delete my own posts either, only edit them
 

Now who is making a fool of themselves
 >@@(*&)


As for the thread I started last night, it was my interpretation of what he actually said....others will interpret what he said differently....the devil is always  in the detail .....he was either not good at being clear or was carefully choosing his words...no where has he categorically said he and SY believe or state as a fact that Madeleine  Mccann was abducted....how could he anyway with no evidence? or at least with the evidence in the files, (which SY had not even half gone through when he made that tv appearance) which the PJ thought was not enough to state this as a fact


From 3 minutes in

I see nothing apart from a possibility, but thats my view!