Author Topic: Can we get one thing straight  (Read 12682 times)

0 Members and 2 Guests are viewing this topic.

Offline Mr Gray

Re: Can we get one thing straight
« Reply #15 on: September 26, 2013, 08:16:48 PM »
For your information I do not have admin or mod rights to be able to delete threads and as a sole poster cannot delete my own posts either, only edit them
 @)(++(*

Now who is making a fool of themselves
 >@@(*&)


As for the thread I started last night, it was my interpretation of what he actually said....others will interpret what he said differently....the devil is always  in the detail .....he was either not good at being clear or was carefully choosing his words...no where has he categorically said he and SY believe or state as a fact that Madeleine  Mccann was abducted....how could he anyway with no evidence? or at least with the evidence in the files, (which SY had not even half gone through when he made that tv appearance) which the PJ thought was not enough to state this as a fact

so who deleted the thread

Offline Mr Gray

Re: Can we get one thing straight
« Reply #16 on: September 26, 2013, 08:17:59 PM »

Are you sure of that?
I doubt that any police force in the world would discard the parents without fully investigating them, in a case like this, and would keep them aware of their movements.

the evidence was all here today and has been deleted

C.Edwards

  • Guest
Re: Can we get one thing straight
« Reply #17 on: September 26, 2013, 08:18:48 PM »
Why do you repeating that canard, made whilst the McCanns were still arguidos?

"keep" missing in there somewhere, HB?  Keep up the grammar standards dear boy, Davel will be incandescent otherwise.

Tell you what. I'll do you a deal. I'll stop posting that bit from the LP if... you'll just find the bit where the LP rescind that statement. It may be on the same piece of paper where the AG override the PJ summary report if that helps you look?

Offline Mr Gray

Re: Can we get one thing straight
« Reply #18 on: September 26, 2013, 08:19:51 PM »
why was the evidence deleted

C.Edwards

  • Guest
Re: Can we get one thing straight
« Reply #19 on: September 26, 2013, 08:20:39 PM »
why was the evidence deleted

I have no idea what you're on about so I'm assuming that's not aimed at me.

Offline Mr Gray

Re: Can we get one thing straight
« Reply #20 on: September 26, 2013, 08:22:52 PM »
I have no idea what you're on about so I'm assuming that's not aimed at me.

red has said she did not delete the thread so did the moderators delete the thread

ferryman

  • Guest
Re: Can we get one thing straight
« Reply #21 on: September 26, 2013, 08:26:40 PM »
"keep" missing in there somewhere, HB?  Keep up the grammar standards dear boy, Davel will be incandescent otherwise.

Tell you what. I'll do you a deal. I'll stop posting that bit from the LP if... you'll just find the bit where the LP rescind that statement. It may be on the same piece of paper where the AG override the PJ summary report if that helps you look?

I daresay that'll be in the report of Stuart Prior which (I hope!) Kate, Gerry and Isabel will have.

Of course, we don't see it on line ...


Redblossom

  • Guest
Re: Can we get one thing straight
« Reply #22 on: September 26, 2013, 08:48:41 PM »

Offline LagosBen

Re: Can we get one thing straight
« Reply #23 on: September 26, 2013, 08:56:56 PM »

Redblossom

  • Guest
Re: Can we get one thing straight
« Reply #24 on: September 26, 2013, 09:58:02 PM »
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AYI0xv3RRYA
So gypsies performed a service for childless couples?h
And hewlett told his son this but he burnt the letter? Ok

Naughty  hewlett jnr

No evidence

Offline LagosBen

Re: Can we get one thing straight
« Reply #25 on: September 26, 2013, 10:02:03 PM »
So gypsies performed a service for childless couples?h
And hewlett told his son this but he burnt the letter? Ok

Naughty  hewlett jnr

No evidence

You may not like it but it is quite possible. 

Offline Albertini

Re: Can we get one thing straight
« Reply #26 on: September 27, 2013, 10:41:58 AM »
Why do you repeating that canard, made whilst the McCanns were still arguidos?

Becuase it was said at the same time that the McCann's were released from arguido status and no evidence has been put forward by the PJ since (and had it done so, it would have triggered a reopening of the case) to change that statement or indeed the PJ's belief that the mcCann's had not been exonerated.

Not forgetting of course that the AG report is NOT  judicial finding and that the AG's interpretation was based on a disturbed or incomplete investigation, which is a direct result of the McCann's and their friends killing Rebelo's investigation by refusing to take part in the reconstruction.

Had the McCann's allowed the investigation to complete then the AG's report may have had different conclusions.

Offline Luz

Re: Can we get one thing straight
« Reply #27 on: September 27, 2013, 11:56:02 AM »
Scotland Yard have made it clear that they consider that Maddie was abducted by a stranger and that the MCCannns nor their friends are suspects or persons of interest. Scotland Yard are also having regular meetings with the McCanns to keep them updated with the REINVESTIGATION.

If you want to keep it straight you have to report what the PJ, the only investigative force, sent to the Public Ministry:

«From the documentation, you will observe that during the investigation various possibilities were contemplated.

As such, consider:

1. abduction, for sexual exploration or other (e.g, later adoption, child trafficking, organ trafficking), without homicide;

2. abduction, followed by homicide with (or without) hiding of the corpse;

3. accidental death, with later hiding of the corpse;» pag 6

http://www.mccannpjfiles.co.uk/PJ/P_J_FINAL_REPORT.htm 



Offline Luz

Re: Can we get one thing straight
« Reply #28 on: September 27, 2013, 12:01:31 PM »
Getting things straight:

«In conclusion, it results from everything that has been done, despite the efforts that were made and all investigation lines being explored, that it is not possible to obtain a solid and objective conclusion about what really happened that night, and about the present location of the missing minor.

On the other hand, it should be referred that this investigation moved itself under conditions of exceptional media exposure, with the publication of many "news" of imprecise, inexact or even false contents, which did not help, in the least, the discovery of the truth and created, many times, a climate of unusual commotion and of lack of serenity.

Therefore, as we do not envision, at the present moment, the execution of any other diligence within the process that might produce any useful result for the process, I submit it to your consideration, for you to determine whatever you may see as convenient.»

PJ Final Report, pag 57

Inferring that SY has any potential knowledge just by reading the documents provided by the PJ, Leicestershire Police, the private detectives,...is bogus, in my opinion.
« Last Edit: September 27, 2013, 12:05:29 PM by Luz »

Offline sadie

Re: Can we get one thing straight
« Reply #29 on: September 27, 2013, 12:21:29 PM »
Lots of things against Amaral are being deleted on here, on the internet.

All my Leonor torture photographs have been deleted.  All my early pictures of a happy well fed, well clothed, Joana have been deleted.

The video showing how easy it would have been for bundleman to get away has been deleted off here and the internet.  That video also clearly shows the walled walkways convex curve and how the front door was competely hidden to anyone walking along that path to their apartments

All the evidence gone.

Also Johns imgur image has gone.  Not sure what that was.

Have only looked thru 19 pages of my posts, out of 129 .... and I find seven images/videos wiped.  All essential evidence.  What is going on?

The removal of evidence from the internet.    Is this Amarals Ace?