Such cynicism from one so new to the forum!
This is the kind of information often released by forces in order to increase the viewing of important and potentially case-breaking Crimewatch reconstructions which they are involved in.
And you seem to be very much off target with your reference to this article coming from the paper you suggest by your rather nasty reference. That reference is usually reserved for the Daily Mail. Never mind, you might realise that after posting for a while. After all we don't expect anti McCanns to get even simple details right when they read things and you seem to be fitting the bill perfectly.
My comments about the phones comes from my previous experience of carrying out forensic investigations on hard disks. It's one thing finding the files and another altogether proving who put them there.
I was off target with the paper, and though I may not have posted much on here I have been online since 1991, back when the internet was pretty much the domain of of the military and academia so I have posted quite a bit over the years.
As for getting everything right - well we all make mistakes, a sentiment which I'm sure your ...removed unnecessarily provocative comment ...
N