Author Topic: Wendy Murphy on FOX  (Read 33616 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Redblossom

  • Guest
Re: Wendy Murphy on FOX
« Reply #75 on: October 11, 2013, 02:35:04 PM »
One that never actually existed would be even better. A virtual patsy.

Oh my how will they pull that one off!

Without making this circus the more ridiculous

Redblossom

  • Guest
Re: Wendy Murphy on FOX
« Reply #76 on: October 11, 2013, 02:36:59 PM »
What a shrieky woman ... and did it say she was an attorney?

God help America

All americans are shrieky
 @)(++(*


Offline DCI

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 2585
  • Total likes: 6
  • Why are some folks so sick in the head!!!
Re: Wendy Murphy on FOX
« Reply #77 on: October 11, 2013, 02:44:09 PM »
No, DCI, on the 23th of August the McCanns gave all powers to Carlos P. de Abreu in order to request to the MP a statute of assistants in the process, according to article 68 n°1 of the CPP.

That just shows how much blogs can be trusted, doesn't it.

http://www.gerrymccannsblogs.co.uk/LEGAL.htm#cp
Kate's 500 Mile Cycle Challenge

https://www.justgiving.com/KateMcCann/

AnneGuedes

  • Guest
Re: Wendy Murphy on FOX
« Reply #78 on: October 11, 2013, 02:46:29 PM »
One that never actually existed would be even better. A virtual patsy.
A virtual patsy is better than nothing, but we're deeply like Thomas, we need to see and touch !

AnneGuedes

  • Guest
Re: Wendy Murphy on FOX
« Reply #79 on: October 11, 2013, 02:50:32 PM »
That just shows how much blogs can be trusted, doesn't it.

http://www.gerrymccannsblogs.co.uk/LEGAL.htm#cp
There are mistakes here and there. You have to reckon that the application to the assistant statute, first accepted by the MP, was never a debated issue on forums.

AnneGuedes

  • Guest
Re: Wendy Murphy on FOX
« Reply #80 on: October 11, 2013, 02:54:12 PM »
I am wondering if this emphasis on Germany has anything to so with Hewlett.

See Joana Morais latest blog

And IIRC KM has said in a couple interviews they believe the key lies in Germany!
I really hope they'll not come up with a Hewlettlookalike snatcher Claus.
I guess the rights of man would be flouted.

Lyall

  • Guest
Re: Wendy Murphy on FOX
« Reply #81 on: October 11, 2013, 02:57:34 PM »
Oh my how will they pull that one off!

Without making this circus the more ridiculous

8)-))) Look at how they claimed lots of different witnesses had seen Barry George when only one of the witnesses had actually positively ID'd him. That was the work of Alison Saunders.

Redblossom

  • Guest
Re: Wendy Murphy on FOX
« Reply #82 on: October 11, 2013, 02:59:15 PM »
8)-))) Look at how they claimed lots of different witnesses had seen Barry George when only one of the witnesses had actually positively ID'd him. That was the work of Alison Saunders.

Omg the woman heading up the CPS today and who has been involved in rogatory letters and visits  to Portugal recently?

Lyall

  • Guest
Re: Wendy Murphy on FOX
« Reply #83 on: October 11, 2013, 03:00:30 PM »
Omg the woman heading up the CPS today and who has been involved in rogatory letters and visits  to Portugal recently?

Yep. She was CPS at the first Barry George trial.

Redblossom

  • Guest
Re: Wendy Murphy on FOX
« Reply #84 on: October 11, 2013, 03:04:09 PM »

AnneGuedes

  • Guest
Re: Wendy Murphy on FOX
« Reply #85 on: October 11, 2013, 03:12:10 PM »
It just puzzles me, Benice, why it is taking 2 months at a couple of days a week (if you are lucky)  It seems so wasteful of time and expense.  And for Kate and Gerry, much as it is them who have started this libel case, it must be infuriating to be going back time and again, arranging for the care of the twins, the expense etc. when a week's hearing and be done with it would be much more economical in every way
Why is now the last session fixed on the 27th of November when this trial was scheduled to end on the 23th of September (if I recall it well) ?
I've a feeling that the lawyers used the new version of the CPC to add witnesses (I think I heard the number was limited in the old version).

First the Judge had an emergency and three witnesses were postponed, then a lawyer had a personal problem sufficiently backed up for the Judge to adjourn a whole session. Then the Bar association's president didn't come and the lawyer likely didn't think she had to remind he had to come. Then a lawyer gave up a witness then changed her mind and forgot to apply again. Then Mr McCann wanted to be heard (his lawyer knew he had to be notified before) and one week after Mrs McCann decided she wanted too.
The Judge agenda is very full, the lawyers also have full agendas. So every time a new day has to be determined, it must suit all people and it's not easy because there are 5 lawyers.

Lyall

  • Guest
Re: Wendy Murphy on FOX
« Reply #86 on: October 11, 2013, 03:12:48 PM »
http://www.mirror.co.uk/news/uk-news/jill-dando-murder-witness-comes-2071046

Going off topic but

That chap seems to have missed about 11 months out of his story @)(++(* It was nearly a year before the police turned on Barry.

Offline Sherlock Holmes

Re: Wendy Murphy on FOX
« Reply #87 on: October 11, 2013, 05:27:52 PM »
I couldn't see the vid. just got a frozen page. 

If this lady is an Attorney is she advocating ignoring your lawyer's advice.?  Did she know that Kate was following her Lawyers instructions when she did not answer the 48 questions.

Judging by the efforts of her plastic surgeon, the video is probably responsible for freezing quite a few computer screens, Benice, not just yours.

As to what she says, completely discredits herself with scant knowledge of the basics. And the host isn't much better. Typical US fayre - opinion masquerading (excuse pun) as information.

Offline Mr Gray

Re: Wendy Murphy on FOX
« Reply #88 on: October 11, 2013, 05:36:34 PM »
Indeed, it reflects the rank hypocrisy of the Mccanns supporters.

 did you listen to what she said

Offline Mr Gray

Re: Wendy Murphy on FOX
« Reply #89 on: October 11, 2013, 05:42:00 PM »
I listened to the interview and I think she is just trying to promote herself ..unless of course she knows nothing about the case

What sort of parents hire top attorneys...why, those who fear they are being set up by a police force who have lied to the and who they fear have planted evidence against them

Never answered questions..well that just makes her a liar. Kate answered about 16 hours of questions