Was 50 metres from the apartment 50 metres too far?

[stephen25000]

Really? You debate? Cite, please.

Ah, the personal attacks yet again.

So, so predictable.  *&*%£

[Alfred R Jones]

I wonder if the McCanns are grateful to all those who stick up for them on the internet? Some of the things their say to others are pretty abusive imo. I've been called stupid, snide, a Jesuit (? I know!) and cruel just to name a few of the things they've called me.

having your some of your posts described as snide and cruel is not abusive, it's simply stating the obvious IMO.  Being called a w a n k e r and a tosser and a dick is a different matter though I would say, all names I have been called on this forum, so be thankful the worse you got called was a Jesuit!

[misty]

Ah, the personal attacks yet again.

So, so predictable.  *&*%£

Hardly a personal attack to ask for a cite. You're big on "evidence".

[stephen25000]

Hardly a personal attack to ask for a cite. You're big on "evidence".

You and your fellows ploys in attacking 'sceptics' are as predictable as the rising of the sun.

[misty]

You and your fellows ploys in attacking 'sceptics' are as predictable as the rising of the sun.

Yet you fail to post any sort of counter argument regarding what 29 Met Officers & a Portuguese task force have been investigating for the last 3 years.
Perhaps you should be congratulating the McCanns on outwitting the best, now all efforts to date to convict them have failed.
Never mind about Madeleine.

[stephen25000]

Yet you fail to post any sort of counter argument regarding what 29 Met Officers & a Portuguese task force have been investigating for the last 3 years.
Perhaps you should be congratulating the McCanns on outwitting the best, now all efforts to date to convict them have failed.
Never mind about Madeleine.

The investigating officers have failed to find anything at all.

All that money wasted on a one sided investigation.

You seem to forget that one rather obvious point.

You do also realize a conviction takes place through a court, don't you ?

 and I don't expect that to happen anymore than an abductor will be found. 

[misty]

The investigating officers have failed to find anything at all.

All that money wasted on a one sided investigation.

You seem to forget that one rather obvious point.

You do also realize a conviction takes place through a court, don't you ?

 and I don't expect that to happen anymore than an abductor will be found. 

The reports I read said the Met were focusing on a few definite leads.
They have a clear idea of the situation on the ground leading up to the disappearance.
The PJ are unusually quiet.
It's not over until the fat lady sings and right now she's not even in the room.

[stephen25000]

The reports I read said the Met were focusing on a few definite leads.
They have a clear idea of the situation on the ground leading up to the disappearance.
The PJ are unusually quiet.
It's not over until the fat lady sings and right now she's not even in the room.

The announcement from SY was full of meaningless cliches.

They are no further on in solving this case as was the case over 8 years ago.

[Mr Gray]

The announcement from SY was full of meaningless cliches.

They are no further on in solving this case as was the case over 8 years ago.

we are all aware the case may never be solved

[G-Unit]

you must be absolutely crazy

People spend hours speaking for them. The media, Clarence Mitchell, 'sauces', family and friends, those on here and elsewhere who support them. Why not speak for themselves? It would be most interesting.

[Mr Gray]

People spend hours speaking for them. The media, Clarence Mitchell, 'sauces', family and friends, those on here and elsewhere who support them. Why not speak for themselves? It would be most interesting.

to anonymous abusive trolls.....there are those on here

[Alfred R Jones]

If the McCanns wished they could join here.

I think they probably have quite enough shit in their lives to have to deal with, without signing up here for you to add to it.

[Alfred R Jones]

People spend hours speaking for them. The media, Clarence Mitchell, 'sauces', family and friends, those on here and elsewhere who support them. Why not speak for themselves? It would be most interesting.

Perhaps because their every word is forensically examined, then put through the "sceptic" spin machine and finally flung back in their faces as evidence of their supposed lies and guilt.

[mercury]

having your some of your posts described as snide and cruel is not abusive, it's simply stating the obvious IMO.  Being called a w a n k e r and a tosser and a dick is a different matter though I would say, all names I have been called on this forum, so be thankful the worse you got called was a Jesuit!

Yes very thankful when compared to your and yiur non sceptic communitys abuses ie calling people sutcliffe supporters...blind hypocrite of the extreme

[Alice Purjorick]

The reports I read said the Met were focusing on a few definite leads.
They have a clear idea of the situation on the ground leading up to the disappearance.
The PJ are unusually quiet.
It's not over until the fat lady sings and right now she's not even in the room.

Not according to an article linked by Brietta a few days ago:

"Speaking to The Portugal News on Wednesday, a Portuguese police source said that while there are “about two or three other cases of missing children in Portugal, but we have a reasonable understanding of who might be responsible for their disappearance. However in the case of Madeleine McCann, we are yet to come up with a satisfactory explanation as to what happened to her”, saying that this a feature of the case that will keep it alive here even if the case into her disappearance were to one day be shelved".