Was 50 metres from the apartment 50 metres too far?

[Brietta]

Fact is, the restaurant was ninety metres walk from the childrens bedroom.

Fact is ... whether the eighty paces distance counted by Martin Brunt which it was said was possible to traverse in less than a minute ... the factor not considered in a risk assessment for the children was that an abductor would enter the premises and steal a child.

Even after the event the authorities did not take this into consideration till some time had elapsed.

They did not know about home invasions and attacks on children while their parents slept, making distance a bit of an irrelevance.

They made a huge mistake and said so right from the very beginning.  "We've let her down!".  So why labour the point?  the only possible reason I can see for it is as a convenient rod for the Drs McCann backs.

Isn't it about time it was realised that enough is enough and wish this family a positive outcome.

[G-Unit]

/

I'm thinking of the mod who called them shit parents....that's the standard of the forum. Anyone who thinks it would be reasonable for the mccanns to come on here is way out of touch with reality

Cite? what do those who get 'watched' do wrong then? Are they innocent and misunderstood perchance?

[G-Unit]

Fact is ... whether the eighty paces distance counted by Martin Brunt which it was said was possible to traverse in less than a minute ... the factor not considered in a risk assessment for the children was that an abductor would enter the premises and steal a child.

Even after the event the authorities did not take this into consideration till some time had elapsed.

They did not know about home invasions and attacks on children while their parents slept, making distance a bit of an irrelevance.

They made a huge mistake and said so right from the very beginning.  "We've let her down!".  So why labour the point?  the only possible reason I can see for it is as a convenient rod for the Drs McCann backs.

Isn't it about time it was realised that enough is enough and wish this family a positive outcome.

It has yet to be proved that an abductor entered G5A and stole a child, so it's not actually relevant. The child wandering and/or having an accident are just as possible. People don't hire babysitters just to stave off abductions, they hire them because small children shouldn't be left home alone.

[stephen25000]

It has yet to be proved that an abductor entered G5A and stole a child, so it's not actually relevant. The child wandering and/or having an accident are just as possible. People don't hire babysitters just to stave off abductions, they hire them because small children shouldn't be left home alone.

That's the key element that mccann supporters can't or won't admit.

No proof of abduction.

Quite happy to say no proof of accidental death or Madeleine walking out of the apartment and disappearing though.

[Mr Gray]

/
Cite? what do those who get 'watched' do wrong then? Are they innocent and misunderstood perchance?

we don't need a cite...angelo has repeated it several times and I'm sure will be happy to confirm...then we have posters calling them thick...liars...anyone who thinks it would be reasonable to expect the mccanns to post on here is barmy

[Mr Gray]

That's the key element that mccann supporters can't or won't admit.

No proof of abduction.

Quite happy to say no proof of accidental death or Madeleine walking out of the apartment and disappearing though.

so now its proof rather than evidence..not sure are you

[stephen25000]

so now its proof rather than evidence..not sure are you

Wrong again dave.

There is neither evidence, let alone proof of abduction.

Haven't you got the message yet, neither of the investigative teams have found anything.

[Mr Gray]

Wrong again dave.

There is neither evidence, let alone proof of abduction.

Haven't you got the message yet, neither of the investigative teams have found anything.

redwood stated.....criminal act by a stranger...based on the evidence...fact

[stephen25000]

redwood stated.....criminal act by a stranger...based on the evidence...fact

`

Dream on dave.

There is no forensic evidence to show an 'abductor'.

In fact there is b....r all.

That is why they haven't found Madeleine or how she disappeared.

Do keep up.

[G-Unit]

we don't need a cite...angelo has repeated it several times and I'm sure will be happy to confirm...then we have posters calling them thick...liars...anyone who thinks it would be reasonable to expect the mccanns to post on here is barmy

I would imagine innocent people would be happy to answer any questions whatsoever.

[Benice]

`

Dream on dave.

There is no forensic evidence to show an 'abductor'.

In fact there is b....r all.

That is why they haven't found Madeleine or how she disappeared.

Do keep up.

Why do you keep ignoring the fact that evidence of an abduction which may have been there -  was possibly destroyed by the traffic of people/police/dogs through the apartment and by the less than perfect expertise of those collecting evidence - noted by Amaral himself?

To claim there was no evidence of an abduction is wrong - unless you can prove it never existed in the first place. Can you do that?

[stephen25000]

Why do you keep ignoring the fact that evidence of an abduction which may have been there -  was possibly destroyed by the traffic of people/police/dogs through the apartment and by the less than perfect expertise of those collecting evidence - noted by Amaral himself?

To claim there was no evidence of an abduction is wrong - unless you can prove it never existed in the first place. Can you do that?

Are you a bit slow, then what you said applies to ACCIDENTAL DEATH and the WALKING OUT OF THE APARTMENT.

 

[Mr Gray]

I would imagine innocent people would be happy to answer any questions whatsoever.

are you crazy...you must be...you think it would be reasonable to expect the mcccanns to come on this forum and answer questions from any anonymous person...you must be absolutely mad   ...a forum on which a moderator calls them shit parents

[faithlilly]

No they don't, not unless you believe they are gluttons for punishment, or mental.

Stop being silly Alfie, of course they do. Whether they would want to is a different matter entirely.

[G-Unit]

to anonymous abusive trolls.....there are those on here

People have been abusive to each other since there were human beings. The only difference these days is that it's anonymous on the internet. That allows some hate-filled, self deluding, faux intelligent, holier than thou people to vent their spleen on all and sundry without being identified, usually because they would be too cowardly to do it in their own names. That's why a reputable forum imposes penalties; to keep these people in order.

According to Bernard Hogan-Howe being abusive is just 'what happens in life'.
http://www.bbc.co.uk/radio/player/p02789bx

The only time the police would be interested is if people were racist, threatening, or blackmailing; i.e. breaking the law.