Author Topic: Amaral say's its a "publicity stunt"  (Read 39821 times)

0 Members and 2 Guests are viewing this topic.

lizzibif.

  • Guest
Re: Amaral say's its a "publicity stunt"
« Reply #120 on: October 25, 2013, 05:04:43 PM »
Amaral says anything but his prayers...look where its got him so far ...in a court room

does anyone actually believe his theories ?..that the parents kept madeleine a fridge for 25 days then put her in a hire car and disposed of her body i find that hard to believe... a genuine question btw.

Offline John

Re: Amaral say's its a "publicity stunt"
« Reply #121 on: October 25, 2013, 05:08:57 PM »
It is very noticeable how everyone targets Dr Amaral but he is only one man.  A lot of police officers from both England and Portugal investigated the case and agreed with him.  Where are these shrinking violets now?

Spending the sort of money Scotland Yard is doing on this case is madness.  They obviously have far too many resources available to them to pursue wild goose chases whereas regional police services are starved of funds.  But hey, its London, they get whatever they want.
A malicious prosecution for a crime which never existed. An exposé of egregious malfeasance by public officials.
Indeed, the truth never changes with the passage of time.

Offline Wonderfulspam

Re: Amaral say's its a "publicity stunt"
« Reply #122 on: October 25, 2013, 05:12:19 PM »
Amaral says anything but his prayers...look where its got him so far ...in a court room

does anyone actually believe his theories ?..that the parents kept madeleine a fridge for 25 days then put her in a hire car and disposed of her body i find that hard to believe... a genuine question btw.

Not this part necessarily
"that the parents kept madeleine a fridge for 25 days then put her in a hire car and disposed of her body"

But with the basis for his thoughts along the lines of she died they lied,
I can go with that.
Christian Brueckner Fan Club

lizzibif.

  • Guest
Re: Amaral say's its a "publicity stunt"
« Reply #123 on: October 25, 2013, 05:15:22 PM »
It is very noticeable how everyone targets Dr Amaral but he is only one man.  A lot of police officers from both England and Portugal investigated the case and agreed with him.  Where are these shrinking violets now?

Spending the sort of money Scotland Yard is doing on this case is madness.  They obviously have far too many resources available to them to pursue wild goose chases whereas regional police services are starved of funds.  But hey, its London, they get whatever they want.


where did they agree with his theories john ? you have to remember there is no evidence of amarals theories unless i missed something..did they ever find the supposed fridge ?

lizzibif.

  • Guest
Re: Amaral say's its a "publicity stunt"
« Reply #124 on: October 25, 2013, 05:24:02 PM »
Not this part necessarily
"that the parents kept madeleine a fridge for 25 days then put her in a hire car and disposed of her body"

But with the basis for his thoughts along the lines of she died they lied,
I can go with that.

a big exaggeration from amaral I would say ..I remember he was spouting the ffs results before he even received them...very strange don't you think ..did he actually understand them anyway ?

Aegean

  • Guest
Re: Amaral say's its a "publicity stunt"
« Reply #125 on: October 25, 2013, 05:27:10 PM »

where did they agree with his theories john ? you have to remember there is no evidence of amarals theories unless i missed something..did they ever find the supposed fridge ?

British police must have gone along with his theories to a certain extent as they were willing to do the DNA analysis on the car boot.

lizzibif.

  • Guest
Re: Amaral say's its a "publicity stunt"
« Reply #126 on: October 25, 2013, 05:34:09 PM »
British police must have gone along with his theories to a certain extent as they were willing to do the DNA analysis on the car boot.


That ended inconclusive ...and remember it was a Portuguese investigation a lot has changed since SY got involved.

C.Edwards

  • Guest
Re: Amaral say's its a "publicity stunt"
« Reply #127 on: October 25, 2013, 05:40:26 PM »

That ended inconclusive ...and remember it was a Portuguese investigation a lot has changed since SY got involved.

Can you name some things that have changed then?  I thought there was a certain something called judicial secrecy that stopped things being known about ongoing investigations so I hope you're not just making guesses?

lizzibif.

  • Guest
Re: Amaral say's its a "publicity stunt"
« Reply #128 on: October 25, 2013, 05:44:30 PM »
Can you name some things that have changed then?  I thought there was a certain something called judicial secrecy that stopped things being known about ongoing investigations so I hope you're not just making guesses?


Judicial secrecy when it suited you mean...

do i have a stalker ? on the other thread you said you weren't interested in my opinon ..could of fooled me ...lol

Aegean

  • Guest
Re: Amaral say's its a "publicity stunt"
« Reply #129 on: October 25, 2013, 05:51:45 PM »

That ended inconclusive ...and remember it was a Portuguese investigation a lot has changed since SY got involved.

Yes, it ended inconclusively but it also shows that British police were indeed open at one point to the idea that the McCanns may have been involved in the disappearance of their daughter, not just Amaral.

C.Edwards

  • Guest
Re: Amaral say's its a "publicity stunt"
« Reply #130 on: October 25, 2013, 05:52:00 PM »

Judicial secrecy when it suited you mean...

do i have a stalker ? on the other thread you said you weren't interested in my opinon ..could of fooled me ...lol

Please feel free to find where I said I have no interest in your opinion and post it here. I'll wait.

Offline imustpointout

Re: Amaral say's its a "publicity stunt"
« Reply #131 on: October 25, 2013, 05:55:50 PM »
25/10/13

C.Edwards

Re: PM query .
« Reply #26 on: Today at 05:32:42 PM

I have no interest in, nor opinion of, your deflection question.

Offline gilet

Re: Amaral say's its a "publicity stunt"
« Reply #132 on: October 25, 2013, 05:59:59 PM »
I thought the fact that he had any air time was truly astounding!

Actually I have to agree with you on that. It really isn't often that a policeman who got thrown off the case and was later convicted of a criminal offence relating to a similar case is given air time to discuss events, is it?


lizzibif.

  • Guest
Re: Amaral say's its a "publicity stunt"
« Reply #133 on: October 25, 2013, 06:00:39 PM »
25/10/13

C.Edwards

Re: PM query .
« Reply #26 on: Today at 05:32:42 PM

I have no interest in, nor opinion of, your deflection question.

thanks ..but I wasn't going to go running around after Edwards ..to prove myself right ..I knew I was  8((()*/

C.Edwards

  • Guest
Re: Amaral say's its a "publicity stunt"
« Reply #134 on: October 25, 2013, 06:03:21 PM »
25/10/13

C.Edwards

Re: PM query .
« Reply #26 on: Today at 05:32:42 PM

I have no interest in, nor opinion of, your deflection question.

 @)(++(* 8@??)(

The "deflection question" was at the end of lizzibifs response and was: 'why do you think SY got the case reopened "Abduction"'.  It was a clear attempt at sidetracking and not actually attempting to stick to the point. Again.

Seriously, have both of you failed to pick up on this?  Good grief...