« previous next »
Pages: 1 ... 4 5 [6]   Go Down

Author Topic: The Smiths Sighting  (Read 22123 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Online Wonderfulspam

Re: The Smiths Sighting
« Reply #75 on: October 16, 2013, 01:50:47 PM »
Quote from: Redblossom on October 16, 2013, 01:41:09 PM
fact is no one know what took part in those discussions between mr smith and his family,maybe some said it might have been but  Im not sure, or probably not, or no I dont think so, mr smith just said they didnt agree, as you say, he didnt say all of them were 100 % sure it wasnt him,...but mrs amith agreed with him, so its on the table, two of the smith family thought it was, doesnt mean they are right, but you do have to factor in mr smiths uncomfortable reaction on seeing GM coming off that plane

" but you do have to factor in mr smiths uncomfortable reaction on seeing GM coming off that plane"

And I'm sure SY have, it is a much more credible sighting than bundle man & comes from independent witnesses.
It will be interesting to see which T9 member is the first to crack & plea bargain.
The sticker book timeline is connected to this sighting in that they had to alter their cover stories.

Logged
Christian Brueckner Fan Club

Offline imustpointout

Re: The Smiths Sighting
« Reply #76 on: October 16, 2013, 01:54:45 PM »
Logged

Offline Benice

Re: The Smiths Sighting
« Reply #77 on: October 16, 2013, 01:57:12 PM »
Quote from: Wonderfulspam on October 16, 2013, 01:32:56 PM
You clearly state here that
"Other members of the family were 100% sure that it wasn't Gerry"

There is no proof of this.
It is a false & misleading statement, which in effect is a lie.
Those are the facts.
I appologise if that offends you, but that is what happened & nothing more.
I don't think you are a compulsive liar or a generally dishonest person,
I have merely pointed out that in the comment you posted, you presented false misleading statistics.

I have given you the reasons why I believe they were 100% sure that GM was not the man they saw.    But for one last time ----   If they were NOT 100% certain about it -  then they would have said so to Mr. Smith. and imo he would have made a very different statement to the one he did make, when he categorically confirmed that apart from his wife no other members of his family shared his view.  

My last post on the subject.       

Logged
The notion that innocence prevails over guilt – when there is no evidence to the contrary – is what separates civilization from barbarism.    Unfortunately, there are remains of barbarism among us.    Until very recently, it headed the PJ in Portimão. I hope he was the last one.
                                               Henrique Monteiro, chief editor, Expresso, Portugal

Online Wonderfulspam

Re: The Smiths Sighting
« Reply #78 on: October 16, 2013, 02:10:50 PM »
Quote from: Benice on October 16, 2013, 01:57:12 PM
I have given you the reasons why I believe they were 100% sure that GM was not the man they saw.    But for one last time ----   If they were NOT 100% certain about it -  then they would have said so to Mr. Smith. and imo he would have made a very different statement to the one he did make, when he categorically confirmed that apart from his wife no other members of his family shared his view.  

My last post on the subject.       



"I have given you the reasons why I believe they were 100% sure that GM was not the man they saw."

Indeed, YOU BELIEVE.  That does not necessarily make it true. There is no source material to prove it as fact.

Thats all,
I bid you good day with much love & many kisses xxx  8**8:/: 8()-000( 


Logged
Christian Brueckner Fan Club

Offline jassi

Re: The Smiths Sighting
« Reply #79 on: October 16, 2013, 02:13:26 PM »
Not being 100% sure of something is not the same as being 100% unsure of it.
« Last Edit: October 16, 2013, 02:17:13 PM by jassi »
Logged
I believe everything. And l believe nothing.
I suspect everyone. And l suspect no one.
I gather the facts, examine the clues... and before   you know it, the case is solved!"

Or maybe not -

OG have been pushed out by the Germans who have reserved all the deck chairs for the foreseeable future

Offline imustpointout

Re: The Smiths Sighting
« Reply #80 on: October 16, 2013, 02:15:20 PM »
Quote from: jassi on October 16, 2013, 02:13:26 PM
Not being 100% sure of something is not the same as being 100% unsure of it.

are you sure about that?
Logged

Offline jassi

Re: The Smiths Sighting
« Reply #81 on: October 16, 2013, 02:16:35 PM »
Logged
I believe everything. And l believe nothing.
I suspect everyone. And l suspect no one.
I gather the facts, examine the clues... and before   you know it, the case is solved!"

Or maybe not -

OG have been pushed out by the Germans who have reserved all the deck chairs for the foreseeable future

Offline imustpointout

Re: The Smiths Sighting
« Reply #82 on: October 16, 2013, 02:19:19 PM »
Quote from: jassi on October 16, 2013, 02:16:35 PM
I think so

as you only think so then I am sure you din't mean it.
Logged

Offline jassi

Re: The Smiths Sighting
« Reply #83 on: October 16, 2013, 02:22:21 PM »
Quote from: imustpointout on October 16, 2013, 02:19:19 PM
as you only think so then I am sure you din't mean it.

Well, I couldn't be 100% sure is its quite easy to get tied up with double negatives, but certainly 60%-80%
Logged
I believe everything. And l believe nothing.
I suspect everyone. And l suspect no one.
I gather the facts, examine the clues... and before   you know it, the case is solved!"

Or maybe not -

OG have been pushed out by the Germans who have reserved all the deck chairs for the foreseeable future

icabodcrane

  • Guest
Re: The Smiths Sighting
« Reply #84 on: October 16, 2013, 02:23:24 PM »
Quote from: jassi on October 16, 2013, 02:13:26 PM
Not being 100% sure of something is not the same as being 100% unsure of it.

...  and just as well too  ...  otherwise all those members of staff who were not 100%  sure if Gerry was in the Tapas bar that night,  could be said to be  100%  sure that he  wasn't   
Logged

AnneGuedes

  • Guest
Re: The Smiths Sighting
« Reply #85 on: October 16, 2013, 02:34:06 PM »
The negation is often a delicate issue. For instance "not all" can mean all less one, two, etc..
Though Albertini explained it very well, Benice doesn't seem to understand (or doesn't want to..) and feels free to spread the rumour that the Smiths, except for one of them, would swear that Smithman wasn't Mr McCann !
Logged

Offline John

Re: The Smiths Sighting
« Reply #86 on: October 16, 2013, 02:35:31 PM »
Quote from: Wonderfulspam on October 16, 2013, 02:26:25 PM
Still,
It's nice to see I have a warning now for challenging dishonesty.
It makes me feel like part of the team.

Challenging it is permitted, its the way you did it which fell foul of our high standards.
Logged
A malicious prosecution for a crime which never existed. An exposé of egregious malfeasance by public officials.
Indeed, the truth never changes with the passage of time.

Offline imustpointout

Re: The Smiths Sighting
« Reply #87 on: October 16, 2013, 03:01:22 PM »
Quote from: Redblossom on October 16, 2013, 03:00:05 PM
Yea no problem


Although Mr Smith admitted he was not wearing his glasses at the time he later said he thought the man could have been Gerry McCann.

This is an impossibility as dozens of witnesses confirmed he was at the holiday complex at 10pm. British police have also said they are certain that Mr McCann has nothing to do with his daughter’s appearance.

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2462105/Madeleine-McCanns-parents-delight-Crimewatch-response.html

oh dear red - when I quoted a red top earlier you were not at all happy.
Logged

Redblossom

  • Guest
Re: The Smiths Sighting
« Reply #88 on: October 16, 2013, 03:04:04 PM »
Logged

Offline John

Re: The Smiths Sighting
« Reply #89 on: October 16, 2013, 03:35:44 PM »
This topic relates solely to the Smiths sighting and their subsequent involvement.

Gerry's presence at the Ocean Club is discussed on a different thread...

www.miscarriageofjustice.co/index.php?topic=1101.msg30962#msg30962
Logged
A malicious prosecution for a crime which never existed. An exposé of egregious malfeasance by public officials.
Indeed, the truth never changes with the passage of time.
Pages: 1 ... 4 5 [6]   Go Up
« previous next »