Has Amaral now been vindicated? The Tanner sighting was of no consequence.

[Benita]

Well no, we can always add 'they suppressed important information for 5 years' too now.

where's your proof it was the mcCanns that suppressed important information..you don't have a clue do you  8-)(--)

[xtina]

tell it to SY and the pj..its not a issue with them ..or they would be charged..this is finding out where madeleine is and who took her out of her bed ....you don't have a damn clue where this case will end ...what a silly boy you are  8-)(--)

so who's fault would it have been if this had of happened then .................maddies

As well as questioning parts of the McCanns’ evidence, it contained sensitive information about Madeleine’s sleeping patterns and raised the highly sensitive possibility that she could have died in an accident after leaving the apartment herself from one of two unsecured doors.

[Cariad]

where's your proof it was the mcCanns that suppressed important information..you don't have a clue do you  8-)(--)

I potentially do. A letter from their solicitor, binding the PI's to their confidentiality agreement. Whether that will ever be made public is another matter.

Where is your proof that they didn't? They haven't even denied it!

[Benita]

I disagree - until and unless we know ALL the facts then IMO no final conclusions can be made.

We have a newspaper article.   My own opinion of newspapers is that there is a 50-50 chance that they might have got the date right at the top of the page.      And once I read the word 'source'  I know that what follows is usually the speculation of the newspaper disguised as the words of someone else.

The only definite conclusion to be made from this is that the theory that C.Mitchell and the McCanns control the press has effectively been blown out of the water.  IMO.

well said benice

[Benice]

Well they've had 2 and a half years and spent over £5,000,000.

It's SY which doesn't have a clue it seems, metaphorically and literally.

P.S. Stupid insults merely emphasize the weakness of your position.

So what is your opinion of the Portuguese police who have also ruled out the McCanns as suspects and are looking for an abductor?   

[Redblossom]

I potentially do. A letter from their solicitor, binding the PI's to their confidentiality agreement. Whether that will ever be made public is another matter.

Where is your proof that they didn't? They haven't even denied it!

Plus the fact the Mccanns never made a pip squeek about these efits anywhere ever.....

[Redblossom]

So what is your opinion of the Portuguese police who have also ruled out the McCanns as suspects and are looking for an abductor?

The Mccanns are not suspects in the PT police's current line of inquiry...........

Devils in the detail....

[Jazzy]

The Mccanns are not suspects in the PT police's current line of inquiry...........

Devils in the detail....

Isn't it though, current as in new and ongoing.

[Benita]

I potentially do. A letter from their solicitor, binding the PI's to their confidentiality agreement. Whether that will ever be made public is another matter.

Where is your proof that they didn't? They haven't even denied it!

im not the one bleating on about it..i don't have to prove anything ...they have more important things to do than to deny anything for likes you a blogger on a forum..

i prefer to wait it will come in time ..have patience my dear... instead of jumping up and down with glee its not a football match ... 8-)(--)

[stephen25000]

where's your proof it was the mcCanns that suppressed important information..you don't have a clue do you  8-)(--)

Haven't you been reading the news ?

[imustpointout]

A spokesman for Find Madeleine said “all information privately gathered” had been “fully acted upon where necessary” and passed on to Scotland Yard.

"A spokesman for Find Madeleine said “all information privately gathered” had been “fully acted upon where necessary” and passed on to Scotland Yard."

[Benice]

The Mccanns are not suspects in the PT police's current line of inquiry...........

Devils in the detail....

Wishful thinking IMO Red.    I don't think they would have entertained seeing and speaking to the McCanns if they thought there was the slightest chance that they could be  potential suspects. 

(Must go out now)

[stephen25000]

Do you have proof they did ?

[Jazzy]

It seems I and at least one other can't quote imustpointout. Why is that?

That report says all relevant information was passed on to the police. 

[imustpointout]

Do you have proof they did ?

Haven't you been reading the news ?