Author Topic: Another look at Tannerman and those pyjamas.  (Read 50259 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Online Wonderfulspam

Re: Another look at Tannerman and those pyjamas.
« Reply #120 on: May 10, 2014, 12:12:23 PM »
Yes it's bonkers isn't it  8-)(--)  8-)(--)  8-)(--) 3 are needed Sadie  @)(++(* How can Madeleine be seen wearing long sleeves when her mother is making a big point that she was only wearing short sleeves  >@@(*&)

I remember feeling frustrated when David said, ‘Let’s just check the apartment.’ I’d done that, and I knew, I knew, that Madeleine had been abducted. I ran out into the car park, flying from end to end, yelling desperately, ‘Madeleine! Madeleine!’   It was so cold and so windy. I kept picturing her in her short-sleeved Marks and Spencer Eeyore pyjamas and feeling how chilled she would be. Bizarrely, I found myself thinking it would have been better if she’d been wearing her long-sleeved Barbie ones.   (long sleeved re Smithman - PF) Fear was shearing through my body.


I knew she had been abducted, my main concern was her arms getting cold.  @)(++(*


It's bo****ks isn't it, she has deliberately inserted this fabrication of thoughts to add weight to Tannerman & try to counter the Smiths sighting IMO.

Christian Brueckner Fan Club

Offline pathfinder73

Re: Another look at Tannerman and those pyjamas.
« Reply #121 on: May 10, 2014, 12:20:26 PM »
Totally agree to put the emphasis onto Tannerman!
Smithman carrying a child in his arms checked his watch after passing the Smith family and the time was 10:03. Both are still unidentified 10 years later.

Alfred R Jones

  • Guest
Re: Another look at Tannerman and those pyjamas.
« Reply #122 on: May 10, 2014, 07:59:06 PM »
Yes, as if a mother would write about her concerns regarding the comfort and well-being of her missing child in a book about her disappearance, it's utterly preposterous! 

stephen25000

  • Guest
Re: Another look at Tannerman and those pyjamas.
« Reply #123 on: May 10, 2014, 08:11:05 PM »
Yes, as if a mother would write about her concerns regarding the comfort and well-being of her missing child in a book about her disappearance, it's utterly preposterous!

Especially in a 'Mills and Boon' classic such as this. 8)-)))

Alfred R Jones

  • Guest
Re: Another look at Tannerman and those pyjamas.
« Reply #124 on: May 10, 2014, 08:42:38 PM »
I would hardly think long sleeves over short would be at the top of the comfort and well being check sheet. Given the circumstances or alleged circumstances none of that really matters. It's like worrying about your choice of swimsuit when you're about to be eaten by a Great White Shark!
You seem to have missed the point completely.  Never mind.

Offline Brietta

Re: Another look at Tannerman and those pyjamas.
« Reply #125 on: May 10, 2014, 11:02:27 PM »
I would hardly think long sleeves over short would be at the top of the comfort and well being check sheet. Given the circumstances or alleged circumstances none of that really matters. It's like worrying about your choice of swimsuit when you're about to be eaten by a Great White Shark!

That probably describes the syndrome exactly.

My friend wrote off her car on an icy road, it landed on its roof in a field. 

She and her passengers ~ her three children and her mother ~ were hanging upside down trapped by their seatbelts. 
When the emergency services released them, she collapsed weeping copiously about the turkey she was carrying in the boot for Christmas dinner. 

She knew she was being ridiculous but the reaction was outwith her control.

I don’t doubt in times of major stress we may have little control over our thoughts and emotions which obsess on trivia. 

Dr McCann describes a similar inexplicable reaction of worry about pyjamas when it is quite obvious the major trauma was the kidnap of her daughter.
"All I'm going to say is that we've conducted a very serious investigation and there's no indication that Madeleine McCann's parents are connected to her disappearance. On the other hand, we have a lot of evidence pointing out that Christian killed her," Wolter told the "Friday at 9"....

Alfred R Jones

  • Guest
Re: Another look at Tannerman and those pyjamas.
« Reply #126 on: May 10, 2014, 11:42:52 PM »
It's why she starts the sentence descibing her concerns about the pyjamas with the word "bizarrely".  It's so obvious what she meant, I can't believe it needs explaining to English speakers.

Offline Brietta

Re: Another look at Tannerman and those pyjamas.
« Reply #127 on: May 10, 2014, 11:51:56 PM »
It's why she starts the sentence descibing her concerns about the pyjamas with the word "bizarrely".  It's so obvious what she meant, I can't believe it needs explaining to English speakers.

It's either a case of ~ None so blind ...
or the teaching of English needs a radical overhaul.
"All I'm going to say is that we've conducted a very serious investigation and there's no indication that Madeleine McCann's parents are connected to her disappearance. On the other hand, we have a lot of evidence pointing out that Christian killed her," Wolter told the "Friday at 9"....

Offline pathfinder73

Re: Another look at Tannerman and those pyjamas.
« Reply #128 on: May 11, 2014, 12:25:25 AM »
It's why she starts the sentence descibing her concerns about the pyjamas with the word "bizarrely".  It's so obvious what she meant, I can't believe it needs explaining to English speakers.



Was Madeleine wearing that pyjama top over a white long sleeved top like in the following PDL pic ?  >@@(*&)



"I kept picturing her in her short-sleeved Marks and Spencer Eeyore pyjamas and feeling how chilled she would be. Bizarrely, I found myself thinking it would have been better if she’d been wearing her long-sleeved Barbie ones."
« Last Edit: May 11, 2014, 12:57:57 AM by pathfinder73 »
Smithman carrying a child in his arms checked his watch after passing the Smith family and the time was 10:03. Both are still unidentified 10 years later.

Offline pegasus

Re: Another look at Tannerman and those pyjamas.
« Reply #129 on: May 11, 2014, 04:25:26 AM »
I would estimate that innocenttouristman was a youngish looking 40ish at the time IMO.
A big indication that JT saw innocenttouristman and child is pyjama leg length.
It is quite simple: missingchild's pyjamas ended above knee, innocenttouristchild's pyjamas ended below knee.
« Last Edit: August 17, 2014, 02:46:21 PM by John »

Offline pathfinder73

Re: Another look at Tannerman and those pyjamas.
« Reply #130 on: September 12, 2014, 10:26:59 PM »
JT Rog
 
4078    “If you had have thought that was Madeleine at the time you would have said?”
Reply    “Well, yeah, if I’d have thought, yeah, you know, if I’d have seen it was Madeleine you’d have, you know, I’m not going to go ‘Oh there goes Madeleine’, you know, I would have shouted
, but.  But, yeah, I know the Police think I’m a sympathetic witness and whatever, but I don’t know what I can do to”.
 
4078    “And what colours?”
Reply    “Dark colours, but again it was, I think it was quite dark, so dark, sort of darkish jacket but then a more, a lighter trouser but a horrible colour, again this is, sort of a yellowy dark browny, horrible, but not, not a nice colour trousers, but then I wonder whether that was the lights making them look, making them look more of a sort of a mustard, it wasn’t mustard because that’s too bright, but it was just like a, as I say they weren’t nice, they weren’t the sort of clothes I’d expect somebody on a MARK WARNER holiday to, they was, I can’t think of the material, I tried to describe this before, but sort of a cottony material but baggy”.
 
4078    “Okay.  And his build?
Reply    “Medium, well sort of just normal build.  As I say, I think the clothes were quite baggy, so I think they made him look more bigger than he probably was, but.  And also he would have been, his shoulders would have been out, you know, sort of.  So, I think, erm, yeah, medium’ish, a medium’ish build”.
 
4078    “Is there anything else about the man that you can remember now?”
Reply    “No, I mean, I would be so worried now about things that are put into my, I think the only two things that I’m still absolutely adamant on is a lot of hair, sort of a lot of thick, thick hair and sort of dark and baggy, well not, ill fitting clothes I think is the sort of, you know, sort of is the two things that still, I mean obviously I get this image in my head all the time and they are the two things that are still, are still, are still there”.
 
4078    “And, overall, what colour would you say the pyjama bottoms were?”
Reply    “Erm, I can’t, I can’t remember, I mean, I, I can’t remember, well I can’t remember now, but I think they were sort of whitey but with this, with this pattern on, but then some pink.  That’s, that’s what I thought at the time.  It’s harder because now I know what the pyjamas were so I can’t”.
 
4078    “I know this seems like an obvious question, which I think I know the answer to, because I’ve seen the artist’s impression, did you see the man’s face?”
Reply    “No, no, not, no, I mean, just the hair, well not, not that I could remember to give details, give details to”.
 
4078    “How far away from you were they at the closest point?”
Reply    “Phew, as, I mean, it’s hard to, sort of thing, but I think I was sort of halfway, it’s probably sort of five metres, I mean, I’m trying to sort of think in terms of this room, but sort of probably just further than that wall, probably sort of five to ten metres id’ say, if, I don’t know how far it is to there, but”.

4078    “And was there anything about the way he walked or the speed that he was walking that made you think he was about to change direction?”
Reply    “No, no, no, he was just sort of, just walking”.
 
4078    “So you are unable to say where he stopped or?”
Reply    “No, he was just walking on that way as I looked and then I’d, I’d sort of went the opposite way, went the opposite way to carry on the check”.
 
4078    “So you didn’t notice any car headlights or noises from cars?”
Reply    “No, no, because I think, you know, if I’d heard sort of a car screech off quickly at that point, I probably would have, would have taken notice I think”.

4078    “And later on did you think it was significant?
Reply    “It was a, yeah, it was sort of came as soon as, as soon as they said that came, buff, straight.  As soon as I’d seen it there it was forgotten and then, buff, as soon as Rachael said”.
 
4078    “And on the route back can you remember seeing anybody?”
Reply    “No, I have to say, not, not at all.  And Gerry and Jez had gone by that time, so”.

Smithman carrying a child in his arms checked his watch after passing the Smith family and the time was 10:03. Both are still unidentified 10 years later.

Offline pegasus

Re: Another look at Tannerman and those pyjamas.
« Reply #131 on: September 12, 2014, 10:41:28 PM »
http://www.allmystery.de/i/t771edd_10f878_Pyjama-Vater-01.jpg
These pyjama bottoms are long and extend below the knees.
The eeyore pyjamas are short and finish above the knees.
JT described pyjamas which extended below the knees.
Therefore she saw innocentcrecheman's daughter.
 

Offline pathfinder73

Re: Another look at Tannerman and those pyjamas.
« Reply #132 on: September 12, 2014, 10:44:15 PM »
http://www.allmystery.de/i/t771edd_10f878_Pyjama-Vater-01.jpg
These pyjama bottoms are long and extend below the knees.
The eeyore pyjamas are short and finish above the knees.
JT described pyjamas which extended below the knees.
Therefore she saw innocentcrecheman's daughter.
 


Agreed the yard are correct. Tannerman is Crecheman (see my Smithman thread post to match his colour/baggy clothes - source JT rog). Now they're after the real suspect Smithman who was carrying the older child in a different way.
« Last Edit: September 12, 2014, 10:49:12 PM by pathfinder73 »
Smithman carrying a child in his arms checked his watch after passing the Smith family and the time was 10:03. Both are still unidentified 10 years later.

Offline pegasus

Re: Another look at Tannerman and those pyjamas.
« Reply #133 on: September 12, 2014, 10:47:09 PM »
"a turn-up of some description"

"I thought it was a turn-up"

"or turn-up, as I thought it was"

"possibly with turn-ups"

Source: JT rog

Offline pegasus

Re: Another look at Tannerman and those pyjamas.
« Reply #134 on: September 12, 2014, 10:59:14 PM »
Agreed the yard are correct. Tannerman is Crecheman (see my Smithman thread post to match his colour/baggy clothes - source JT rog). Now they're after the real suspect Smithman who was carrying the older child in a different way.
Agreed on tannerman = yardman.
And agreed the yard are (in their press releases) concentrating on smithman.
However I think they are wrong about smithman - i think he is irrelevant.
IMO smithman = a different innocentdad (not yardman) - shorter hair - and non-english speaking.
« Last Edit: September 12, 2014, 11:04:20 PM by pegasus »