« previous next »
Pages: [1] 2 3   Go Down

Author Topic: PM query .  (Read 8156 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline LagosBen

PM query .
« on: October 25, 2013, 01:44:34 PM »
I don't suppose this thread will last too long someone will "tell Teacher"...but can I just ask?

The recent pm warning received by, let's see I'm guessing most, if not all, McCann supporters ref snidey or provocative comments etc. Was the same pm issued to [ censored word] such as  Stephen, faithfully, Luz, Anne, Redblossom, C. Edwards ?

I have to say this forum does seem rather biased in favour of anti McCanns.

I haven't been here long but I have noticed that pros back up their claims and usually provide links.

[ censored word] make posts etc and do not provide official or genuine sources for much of it but claim it is true.

And some on here have made rude, xenophobic comments or digs...and I never see them reprimanded.

If pros continued to be censored and [ censored word] allowed to post their idea of the "truth" - what's the point of this section?

Or maybe we should do what others do a report every post that annoys us 8-)(--)
Logged

Offline pathfinder73

Re: PM query .
« Reply #1 on: October 25, 2013, 01:51:07 PM »
I try to look at the facts and discrepancies with an open mind and come to my own conclusions. I suppose Eddie the cavader dog didn't like the McCann's and was bias? Ridiculous!
Logged
Smithman carrying a child in his arms checked his watch after passing the Smith family and the time was 10:03. Both are still unidentified 10 years later.

Offline LagosBen

Re: PM query .
« Reply #2 on: October 25, 2013, 01:56:14 PM »
Are you posting on the correct thread?
Logged

Offline Eleanor

Re: PM query .
« Reply #3 on: October 25, 2013, 01:56:33 PM »
Oh, you've noticed, have you.  Join the club.  But it s becoming a badge of honour so don't knock it.  "I've been reported more than you have."

Personally, I can't be bothered to report any of them.
Logged

Lyall

  • Guest
Re: PM query .
« Reply #4 on: October 25, 2013, 01:56:51 PM »
Everyone gets the same messages Ben 8(0(*
Logged

Offline LagosBen

Re: PM query .
« Reply #5 on: October 25, 2013, 02:00:01 PM »
Good - now let's hope that EVERYONE gets censored in the same way.  8((()*/
Logged

Offline LagosBen

Re: PM query .
« Reply #6 on: October 25, 2013, 02:02:21 PM »
Quote from: Eleanor on October 25, 2013, 01:56:33 PM
Oh, you've noticed, have you.  Join the club.  But it s becoming a badge of honour so don't knock it.  "I've been reported more than you have."

Personally, I can't be bothered to report any of them.

I had noticed but I really don't let things bother me too much. I have only reported one post I think because I was told to  @)(++(*

I'd rather not hassle Admin and deal with any annoying person myself. But I really don't like unfairness in who can post what and it seems to me that [ censored word] can post whatever they like fact or not.
Logged

Lyall

  • Guest
Re: PM query .
« Reply #7 on: October 25, 2013, 02:05:49 PM »
Quote from: LagosBen on October 25, 2013, 02:00:01 PM
Good - now let's hope that EVERYONE gets censored in the same way.  8((()*/

I hope you all stay, I find you fascinating >@@(*&)
Logged

Offline LagosBen

Re: PM query .
« Reply #8 on: October 25, 2013, 02:07:36 PM »
 8)--)) Would love to, but have to scoot now.
Logged

Offline Eleanor

Re: PM query .
« Reply #9 on: October 25, 2013, 02:11:38 PM »
Quote from: LagosBen on October 25, 2013, 02:07:36 PM
8)--)) Would love to, but have to scoot now.

Me too.  Got to go and watch some paint dry.  There is only so much fibbing and obfuscation that I can cope with in one go.
Logged

Cariad

  • Guest
Re: PM query .
« Reply #10 on: October 25, 2013, 02:19:28 PM »
Members are asked to abide by the forum rules and etiquette.  Provocative posts and snide remarks will always be removed so there is little point in making them.  Repeat offenders will be sanctioned.

Regards,
The UK Justice Forum Team.

That one? I got it.
Logged

Offline Angelo222

Re: PM query .
« Reply #11 on: October 25, 2013, 02:31:20 PM »
[ censored word] don't post about the McCanns the way pros do about Amaral.  No wonder they get reprimanded.

Do the [ censored word] make personal comments about what the McCanns wear, what they look like etc...  People in glass houses comes to mind.
« Last Edit: October 25, 2013, 02:33:28 PM by Angelo222 »
Logged
De troothe has the annoying habit of coming to the surface just when you least expect it!!

Je ne regrette rien!!

Offline Wonderfulspam

Re: PM query .
« Reply #12 on: October 25, 2013, 02:33:29 PM »
Quote from: Angelo222 on October 25, 2013, 02:31:20 PM
[ censored word] don't post about the McCanns the way pros do about Amaral.  No wonder they get reprimanded.

Yep
Logged
Christian Brueckner Fan Club

Offline sadie

Re: PM query .
« Reply #13 on: October 25, 2013, 04:14:53 PM »
Quote from: LagosBen on October 25, 2013, 01:44:34 PM
I don't suppose this thread will last too long someone will "tell Teacher"...but can I just ask?

The recent pm warning received by, let's see I'm guessing most, if not all, McCann supporters ref snidey or provocative comments etc. Was the same pm issued to [ censored word] such as  Stephen, faithfully, Luz, Anne, Redblossom, C. Edwards ?

I have to say this forum does seem rather biased in favour of anti McCanns.

I haven't been here long but I have noticed that pros back up their claims and usually provide links.

[ censored word] make posts etc and do not provide official or genuine sources for much of it but claim it is true.

And some on here have made rude, xenophobic comments or digs...and I never see them reprimanded.

If pros continued to be censored and [ censored word] allowed to post their idea of the "truth" - what's the point of this section?

Or maybe we should do what others do a report every post that annoys us 8-)(--)

For months, I never lowered myself to complaining until it became obvious that I was being extremely bullied by someone on here and that they were taking every opportunity to complain against me when, after much provacation I responded, altho in a watered down style.

I decided to start complaining.  So I hit the button, and put in many reports, but nothing happened except it helped the mods to find the offensive (extremely offensive at times) post and remove it.  The offenders nasty score rarely moved.and if it did, it moved in a miniscule manner.  As long term posters on here will recognise I was severely bullied.

You can hit the "report to Moderator" button as often as you like and give sound reasons for your complaint, but all it usually does is help the Mods clear out anything that an anti shouldldn't have said.  It saves them looking and enables them to give a good clean look to some nasty people.

The offender rarely gets punished and carries on telling lies or bullying.  Pffft!



If the only way that arguments can be "won" is by telling lies and bullying, it doesn't say much for this forum.

A level playing field please Mods
Logged

Offline Albertini

Re: PM query .
« Reply #14 on: October 25, 2013, 04:26:05 PM »
Well when i joined there were far more supporters of the family on here than there were those who did not accept the McCann's version of events.

I do not recall the same level of  incessant whining about bias from the small band of "[ censored word]", for want of a better term, who were here then and when those "[ censored word]" were in the minority.

Neither do i recall the "pros" having any issues with the moderation when they were in the majority on here.

I suggest people aren't as precious nor take the idea of posting on an internet forum so seriously.

Seems to me recently more people are solely interested in finding things to be offended about, displaying faux outrage and revulsion at other posters and reporting every little thing to the Mods, who must dread this forum with a passion, with all the work moderating it must entail.

How about everyone who posts on here simply engages in discussion rather than making life even more difficult for the mods.

Just a thought.
Logged
Pages: [1] 2 3   Go Up
« previous next »