Bamber case on ITV Tonight Programme 29th March 2012

[puglove]

I doubt if anyone really thinks that Sheila shot herself twice. Whatever they say. And she looks like she just got out of bed. (Or was taken from her bed)

[Angelo222]

I doubt if anyone really thinks that Sheila shot herself twice. Whatever they say. And she looks like she just got out of bed. (Or was taken from her bed)

I don't believe there is any evidence that she was shot anywhere other than where she was found but there is every reason to believe that she may have been rendered unconscious before being carried there.  The evidence for this though would be difficult to establish but her calm appearance certainly suggests such a scenario.

[puglove]

I have to ask - why does the other forum keep writing such nonsense? Do they want Bamber freed, or do they want to make him a laughing stock?

[goatboy]

Also isn't part of the problem with their new evidence that the end of the rifle couldn't possibly have heated up to 200 degrees (which they acknowledged) so the tests are irrelevant anyway?

[puglove]

Also isn't part of the problem with their new evidence that the end of the rifle couldn't possibly have heated up to 200 degrees (which they acknowledged) so the tests are irrelevant anyway?

Heated up in the Aga apparently, for some bizarre reason yet to be fully explained. I think that many posters on the Tesko forum write because they have nothing else to do. Hence the nonsense.

[Weety]

You have to wonder as well, how they're going to get this past the 'new evidence' test required for an appeal. There was nothing in those tests that couldn't have been done 26 years ago.

[John]

I have to ask - why does the other forum keep writing such nonsense? Do they want Bamber freed, or do they want to make him a laughing stock?

That's a good point Smokey.  By all accounts the latter if what has been posted there in the last 6 weeks is anything to go by.  I have said it many times that I think Jeremy should be pitied if anything as those who profess to be his supporters are little better than a bunch of football hooligans.  Actually, I think the football supporters are probably better behaved if the truth be known.   

[John]

Some great news tonight. 

One of the radio stations wants me to brief them on the evidence against Jeremy Bamber.  Seems they are so impressed by this forum and all that we do together.  Well done everyone!

[Jerry]

I take it this is a response to what Simon McKay was promoting last week on ITV and on the radio at the weekend?

[goatboy]

Anyone else seen this on the other forum?

http://jeremybamberforum.co.uk/index.php/topic,2481.0.html

Transcripts of Bamber's interviews with police under caution. My interpretation of this is that Jeremy comes across as very slippery and evasive-particularly in the way he refuses to answer certain questions (not wanting to incriminate himself by telling the truth perhaps?). In fact he comes across so badly I cannot believe it was posted on Tesko's forum.

[John]

I take it this is a response to what Simon McKay was promoting last week on ITV and on the radio at the weekend?

Yes Jerry, as you are probably aware the forum is conducting a campaign on Twitter in respect of various cases.  There has been an amazing response with nearly 3,500 followers in the few weeks since going live. The vast majority of these followers are law professionals, writers, journalists and TV producers from all over the UK and further afield.

It was only a matter of time before the Press got wind of what was really going on in the Bamber case and I intend to set them straight. 

[John]

Anyone else seen this on the other forum?

http://jeremybamberforum.co.uk/index.php/topic,2481.0.html

Transcripts of Bamber's interviews with police under caution. My interpretation of this is that Jeremy comes across as very slippery and evasive-particularly in the way he refuses to answer certain questions (not wanting to incriminate himself by telling the truth perhaps?). In fact he comes across so badly I cannot believe it was posted on Tesko's forum.

A liar is always caught out in the end.  Jeremy could even remember who he telephoned first on the morning of the murders because he said one thing to the press and something else to the police.

I can tell you that he telephoned Julie Mugford at 3am but he didn't telephone the police until after 3.26am.  So why was he telling some people that he telephoned Julie after having telephoned the police.  He was caught out in his own web of deceit.

[Admin]

Anyone else seen this on the other forum?

http://jeremybamberforum.co.uk/index.php/topic,2481.0.html

Transcripts of Bamber's interviews with police under caution. My interpretation of this is that Jeremy comes across as very slippery and evasive-particularly in the way he refuses to answer certain questions (not wanting to incriminate himself by telling the truth perhaps?). In fact he comes across so badly I cannot believe it was posted on Tesko's forum.

Thanks for reminding of those statements goatboy.  When we finish putting up the remainder of Julie Mugfords diary we will post those statements for everyone to read here.

Nice one on the radio interview John!   

[puglove]

Welcome to the forum, Fred. I hope you find it interesting.

[puglove]

however hard I try I just cannot make head or tail of Mike tesko's posts, he contradicts himself 100 times a day (I hesitate to use the term lie). his head seems to be full of magic. he would earn more respect if he came clean and admitted that he is as puzzled about the case as everyone else. my apologies if all this are the consequences of an illness, but if that is the case he should walk away for a while and concentrate on himself. i fear he is damaging any chance that Jeremy Bamber has of being taken seriously. it just looks like a confused man's obsession.