Author Topic: Why didnt the portuguese police arrest the mccanns ... after the dogs findings  (Read 65491 times)

0 Members and 3 Guests are viewing this topic.

stephen25000

  • Guest
And as Poirot might also say out this board, Evasion, evasion, evasion .   What's wrong with answering a simple straightforward question ?

Why Mr. 'Splendour of truth' this fixation with a fictional detective ?

Meanwhile the mccanns have postulated an abduction without a dicky-bow of evidence.


Offline Montclair

Let's hear your evidence why you think she isn't.   Assuming you have anything that could be called evidence.

Raw nerve?.   To judge by your comments yours are in bits.

The fact that there is no evidence that she was abducted is the evidence. Absence of evidence is just as important as evidence.

Offline pathfinder73

Let's hear your evidence why you think she isn't.   Assuming you have anything that could be called evidence.

Raw nerve?.   To judge by your comments yours are in bits.

There will be enough evidence to prove simulated abduction only if they can positively identify Smithman and then unfortunately Madeleine's death will be known to all. They must be looking to find her first.
Smithman carrying a child in his arms checked his watch after passing the Smith family and the time was 10:03. Both are still unidentified 10 years later.

Offline Rogerandout

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 383
  • Total likes: 0
  • Upholder of Verifiable Scientific Truth
The fact that there is no evidence that she was abducted is the evidence. Absence of evidence is just as important as evidence.

Absence of evidence is not evidence of absence.
I

Offline Mr Gray

The fact that there is no evidence that she was abducted is the evidence. Absence of evidence is just as important as evidence.

There may well have been loads of evidence of abduction but the Pj didn't do their job properly  and missed it

stephen25000

  • Guest
[ignorestupidabuse]I accept the possibility of anything. I require convincing evidence to make a decision[/ignorestupidabuse]

Abuse reported.

You have claimed you are a pharmacist, without a shred of evidence,so how is that abuse ?
« Last Edit: December 02, 2013, 07:14:41 PM by stephen25000 »

stephen25000

  • Guest
Stehen..you have claimed to have a degree in chemistry but failed to be able to answer a simple question

Incorrect, I answered the question.

As to people  saying what qualifications they have or don't, unless proved, they are meaningless.

stephen25000

  • Guest
Stephen

With all due respect how does one post that kind of evidence on the Internet?  You want to know it for sure it has to be done outside of cyberspace.

I am trying to make a simple point.

Anyone can claim anything they want to , as we have seen in this case...............

The Mccanns have claimed there was an abduction without an iota of proof, but we are asked to accept it.

The forensic examination of the flat, and elsewhere did not prove  anything either, which I accept.

So where does that leave us ?




Offline Mr Gray

I am trying to make a simple point.

Anyone can claim anything they want to , as we have seen in this case...............

The Mccanns have claimed there was an abduction without an iota of proof, but we are asked to accept it.

The forensic examination of the flat, and elsewhere did not prove  anything either, which I accept.

So where does that leave us ?

 You have not been asked to accept anything...its nothing to do with you

Offline Apostate

You have not been asked to accept anything...its nothing to do with you

the McCanns have done little else but ask us to accept the abduction theory

stephen25000

  • Guest
You have not been asked to accept anything...its nothing to do with you

Wrong on that.

I am a tax payer, and tax payers money has gone into the 'investigation'.

stephen25000

  • Guest
Where does that leave us?   With no right to conduct 'trial' by way of the Internet.

So why do you post on here ?

Offline Rogerandout

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 383
  • Total likes: 0
  • Upholder of Verifiable Scientific Truth
Wrong on that.

I am a tax payer, and tax payers money has gone into the 'investigation'.

I am a taxpayer and object to Nuclear weapons and our criminal-industrial justice system. What rights does this give me?
I

Offline Mr Gray

Wrong on that.

I am a tax payer, and tax payers money has gone into the 'investigation'.

nothing to do with you...you elect your mp and you have to stand by what govt decides...govt does not have to answer to you how money is spent...only at the ballot box..you are not as important as you think you are

Lyall

  • Guest
nothing to do with you...you elect your mp and you have to stand by what govt decides...govt does not have to answer to you how money is spent...only at the ballot box..you are not as important as you think you are

Oh dear. What would Thomas Jefferson think of this statement 8(8-))