Author Topic: Was Calpol in 2007 really a sedative?  (Read 90892 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Redblossom

  • Guest
Re: Was Calpol in 2007 really a sedative?
« Reply #210 on: November 23, 2013, 10:11:20 PM »
Whatever 8(>((

So true, thanks for the honesty.......Night dear
 8**8:/:


Offline Mr Gray

Re: Was Calpol in 2007 really a sedative?
« Reply #211 on: November 23, 2013, 10:12:14 PM »
Well I just tried searching M for "McCann Sceptic" in the Oxford dictionary and I couldn't find it.

Then pat will be absolutely lost

Offline Mr Gray

Re: Was Calpol in 2007 really a sedative?
« Reply #212 on: November 23, 2013, 10:13:30 PM »
What's a "McCann sceptic" davel ?

 Do you not understand

Redblossom

  • Guest
Re: Was Calpol in 2007 really a sedative?
« Reply #213 on: November 23, 2013, 10:13:44 PM »
no, the ISSUE is why the mccanns didnt get their toddlers checked out pdq after their eldest was abducted and which they believed was drugged along with their other two.....so much so the mother was checking them for signs of life that very night! how the feck would she know they werent given some deadly drug????Stop  obfuscating.........the question has nothing at all to do  with kate mccann being accused of drugging the twins months later...nothing at all....the question is why she did not take them to a and e that very night! To check for drugs or anything else....
 >@@(*&)

  This was explained to you before on the thread, but you ignored  it for some reason
Well?
Your skewing facts will never get the real facts to go away

BUMP before bed, the subject the pro mccans cant answer and wont talk about, just one of many, where they remain silent, tara
 8((()*/

« Last Edit: November 23, 2013, 10:16:00 PM by Redblossom »

Offline Mr Gray

Re: Was Calpol in 2007 really a sedative?
« Reply #214 on: November 23, 2013, 10:15:23 PM »
That flies in the face of your earlier statement -

Quote from: Rogerandout on Today at 05:46:41 PM
Pain is a process:

Calpol does reduce pain

 Pat ...my father was irish...he was a very intelligent man...you are giving the irish a bad name

Offline Rogerandout

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 383
  • Total likes: 0
  • Upholder of Verifiable Scientific Truth
Re: Was Calpol in 2007 really a sedative?
« Reply #215 on: November 23, 2013, 10:15:59 PM »
That flies in the face of your earlier statement -

Quote from: Rogerandout on Today at 05:46:41 PM
Pain is a process:

Calpol does reduce pain

Pain is a process between the outside world, the body and the brain.

Calpol does reduce pain because it is an analgesic. It does this by changing the chemical state of the affected area but does not impact directly on the nervous system. It is neither a sedative nor an hypnotic.
I

Offline Mr Gray

Re: Was Calpol in 2007 really a sedative?
« Reply #216 on: November 23, 2013, 10:16:48 PM »
You've introduced that quote "McCann sceptic" into the debate, I've asked you to explain it to me !
Simple request, simple explanation required please.
if you are that thick that you don't understand the English language then its a waste of time

Offline Mr Gray

Re: Was Calpol in 2007 really a sedative?
« Reply #217 on: November 23, 2013, 10:18:33 PM »
You've introduced that quote "McCann sceptic" into the debate, I've asked you to explain it to me !
Simple request, simple explanation required please.

would you like me to explain the word sedative to you as I am an expert in the field

Offline Mr Gray

Re: Was Calpol in 2007 really a sedative?
« Reply #218 on: November 23, 2013, 10:20:01 PM »
Sorry but is that some form of quasi English you are speaking ? What does "then Irish" mean ?

its called a typo...have you never heard of that either

Offline Mr Gray

Re: Was Calpol in 2007 really a sedative?
« Reply #219 on: November 23, 2013, 10:22:37 PM »
I'd like you to explain what a "McCann sceptic" is !
I refer you to my previous post prat..oh another typo

Offline Wonderfulspam

Re: Was Calpol in 2007 really a sedative?
« Reply #220 on: November 23, 2013, 10:23:00 PM »
its called a typo...have you never heard of that either

Is it Irish for sedative?
Christian Brueckner Fan Club

Redblossom

  • Guest
Re: Was Calpol in 2007 really a sedative?
« Reply #221 on: November 23, 2013, 10:24:14 PM »
Pat ...my father was irish...he was a very intelligent man...you are giving the irish a bad name

Pity he didnt pass his genes on to you then in that respect..obviously left a  blank so you now call everyone else stupid fool thick  prat etc LOL!

only one that you make look a fool is yourself

Right

Gone
 @)(++(*

>>>>>




Offline Mr Gray

Re: Was Calpol in 2007 really a sedative?
« Reply #222 on: November 23, 2013, 10:25:22 PM »
Is it Irish for sedative?

Perhaps you would like to explain to pat what a sceptic is..im sure everybody else knows

Offline Mr Gray

Re: Was Calpol in 2007 really a sedative?
« Reply #223 on: November 23, 2013, 10:30:06 PM »
Still no definition of "McCann sceptic" so !
I doo (sic) hope the moderators come to your rescue soon and delete your rather tedious attemp at debate !

oK a mccannn sceptic is someone who is sceptical towards the McCanns

by the way you spelt attempt wrong..no big deal and I have made a point on this forum about NOT criticising spelling or grammar as some pedants do

Offline Mr Gray

Re: Was Calpol in 2007 really a sedative?
« Reply #224 on: November 23, 2013, 10:31:48 PM »
Pity he didnt pass his genes on to you then in that respect..obviously left a  blank so you now call everyone else stupid fool thick  prat etc LOL!

only one that you make look a fool is yourself

Right

Gone
 @)(++(*


>>>>>

oh Lord its hard to be Humble