Why People who suspect the McCanns get so angry at People who do not.

[Wonderfulspam]

There had to be some reason for your username ...

I like tinned meat.

[Lyall]

Roger cares about The Rule of Law.  Are you saying that you don't?

What's the weather like up there on your high horses >@@(*&)

The day you acknowledge not a single piece of evidence exists to support your theory is the day you can consider looking over the fence at the moral high ground.

But as it is you are foot soldiers in the reputation management campaign, which, for whatever reason, continues to this day.

[AnneGuedes]

That is arrant nonsense. 

But it's produced by you, in spite of pretending it's somebody else's theory !

[Eleanor]

What's the weather like up there on your high horses >@@(*&)

The day you acknowledge not a single piece of evidence exists to support your theory is the day you can consider looking over the fence at the moral high ground.

But as it is you are foot soldiers in the reputation management campaign, which, for whatever reason, continues to this day.

I don't have to acknowledge any such thing.  That's the point.

[Lyall]

I don't have to acknowledge any such thing.  That's the point.

You do, if you're here (and elsewhere) for Madeleine McCann, and not for her parents.

[Redblossom]

There had to be some reason for your username ...

And the reason for yours is? Not charon from mythology, the taxi driver (ferryman)  to hell perchance?
 

[Eleanor]

You do, if you're here (and elsewhere) for Madeleine McCann, and not for her parents.

You really don't understand, do you.  I do not have to prove anything, and nor do The McCanns.  I am here to support The Rule of Law against people like you who have no idea of what it means, but will be only too keen to depend on it should the need arise.

[Rogerandout]

When they found scent at 5A that was a good indication of what may have happened but when they found it again in the hire car and on the clothes then that's not merely a coincidence, there's a connection IMO. That is a misleading subject title and not the truth from what I've found on this forum, rather the opposite.

[Rogerandout]

Why?

In all three for a, the person proposing the position is required to provide evidence whereas sceptics need only question that 'evidence'. This is how knowledge and justice advance.

[Rogerandout]

When they found scent at 5A that was a good indication of what may have happened but when they found it again in the hire car and on the clothes then that's not merely a coincidence, there's a connection IMO. That is a misleading subject title and not the truth from what I've found on this forum, rather the opposite.

Consider serial error.

Additionally, there was no indication of cadaver door in the car as only blood was indicated and found on the key fob.

[Rogerandout]

It was you who spoke of morals was it not?

And for politicaly correct, see above.

Please define how 'morals' and 'political correctness' inform my view.

[Rogerandout]

"pontificating from some moral highground at others"

Quite.

That would be the moral high ground of Truth and Justice then.

[Rogerandout]

Roger, your OP says more about you and what it is you actually care about.

Yes. Truth, Justice, and scientific and forensic methods.

[Lyall]

You really don't understand, do you.  I do not have to prove anything, and nor do The McCanns.  I am here to support The Rule of Law against people like you who have no idea of what it means, but will be only too keen to depend on it should the need arise.

The Rule of PR Law more like, Eleanor

[Rogerandout]

What's the weather like up there on your high horses >@@(*&)

The day you acknowledge not a single piece of evidence exists to support your theory is the day you can consider looking over the fence at the moral high ground.

But as it is you are foot soldiers in the reputation management campaign, which, for whatever reason, continues to this day.

I do not have a theory to support. What I believe is fully supported by the evidence. I do not believe that there is sufficient evidence to make a decision.