Why People who suspect the McCanns get so angry at People who do not.

[Rogerandout]

You do, if you're here (and elsewhere) for Madeleine McCann, and not for her parents.

I am here for the truth, whatever that is.

[Lyall]

I am here for the truth, whatever that is.

Did you ever read the book by Danny Collins?

[Redblossom]

You really don't understand, do you.  I do not have to prove anything, and nor do The McCanns.  I am here to support The Rule of Law against people like you who have no idea of what it means, but will be only too keen to depend on it should the need arise.

[snipping past the unsolicted personal attack]

You cant have that much respect for the law if you then decide arbitrarily as it suits which legal decisions are correct and which arent.....

 >@@(*&)

[Rogerandout]

Did you ever read the book by Danny Collins?

I rarely read fiction.

[Lyall]

I rarely read fiction.

I'll take that as a No then

Ahhh go on, it's still being sold... by Amazon.

[Rogerandout]

I'll take that as a No then

Ahhh go on, it's still being sold... by Amazon.

So is the Bible. So is Harry Potter.

[jassi]

I am here for the truth, whatever that is.

Very little of that on here - mostly just people pushing their own agenda and getting angry when others disagree with them.

[slartibartfast]

In all three for a, the person proposing the position is required to provide evidence whereas sceptics need only question that 'evidence'. This is how knowledge and justice advance.

I was asking why

moral and rational

[Rogerandout]

Very little of that on here - mostly just people pushing their own agenda and getting angry when others disagree with them.

Agree.

The only rational agenda is doubt. All others are pretendy policemen.

[slartibartfast]

Agree.

The only rational agenda is doubt. All others are pretendy policemen.

I agree with that.

[Redblossom]

I'll take that as a No then

Ahhh go on, it's still being sold... by Amazon.

I bought that book...theres alot of stuff in there that never got to the papers or the files..as with everything there were a few errors...the widest read are the best informed

 

[Lyall]

I bought that book...theres alot of stuff in there that never got to the papers or the files..as with everything there were a few errors...the widest read are the best informed

 

I agree, Red, and I mention it to Roger & Co. because they only ever talk about one scenario: the one that suits their chosen vocation.

But Collins discusses another one, and there's yet another that nobody ever discusses (which happens to be the best for Madeleine herself. It's telling they never discuss the hoax possibility).

[Redblossom]

I agree, Red, and I mention it to Roger & Co. because they only ever talk about one scenario: the one that suits their chosen vocation.

But Collins discusses another one, and there's yet another that nobody ever discusses (which happens to be the best for Madeleine herself. It's telling they never discuss the hoax possibility).

Hoax by who?
 >@@(*&)

If it was a hoax the perpetrators of it must be the cruellest maddest people on this planet......shudder

[Eleanor]

And you would point out inconsistencies where ever they arise despite the consequences ?

I haven't seen any inconsistencies that are any more serious than the heat of panic or people having different conceptions of the same events, which is all quite normal.

[Eleanor]

[snipping past the unsolicted personal attack]

You cant have that much respect for the law if you then decide arbitrarily as it suits which legal decisions are correct and which arent.....

 >@@(*&)

Which Legal Decisions?