The Find Madeleine website, Tannerman & the e-fits

[Lyall]

Reputation management campaign?

No ...

I thought you'd deny its existence, even though some of the people involved spoke about it in 2007 and some won industry awards for it.

It's possible the reason or part of the reason why the 10pm sighting efits were never used is because that would have been detrimental to their reputation management, but if you don't even recognise there were two campaigns being run simultaneously then naturally you won't agree with that proposition.

But there were two campaigns and I think at times the aims of one conflicted with the other.

[LagosBen]

Why do you find that funny Anne?

Do you think people on Forums should be afforded all details?

[pathfinder73]

"The appalling loss of our daughter has been too much to bear. Everything else, however huge, has had to take second place. There is only so much pain human beings can stand at once. It doesn’t mean the injustices hurt any less. On the whole Gerry and I have managed to dig deep and remain focused, although the temptation to shout the truth from the rooftops has always been there. There have been many times when I have struggled to keep myself together and to understand how such injustices have been allowed to go unchallenged over and over again. I have had to keep saying to myself: I know the truth, we know the truth and God knows the truth. And one day, the truth will out."

Amen.

[LagosBen]

 .....And the detractors who have hounded this family will slink away.

[pinkblossoms]

Hmm what happened to the peter verran thread  >@@(*&)

[Wonderfulspam]

Hmm what happened to the peter verran thread  >@@(*&)

Maybe it's been abducted.

[AnneGuedes]

Why do you find that funny Anne?

Do you think people on Forums should be afforded all details?

No, but the act of fooling people revolts me.
The motive is essential. The McCann have one, the people we elect democratically don't.
The answering questions "must" made me laugh.

[Angelo222]

Hmm what happened to the peter verran thread  >@@(*&)

http://miscarriageofjustice.co/index.php?topic=3045.msg114569#msg114569

[AnneGuedes]

Maybe it's been abducted.

Perhaps it's a self abduction..

[Sherlock Holmes]

That's quite a good point

I suppose if the McCanns were more open and transparent  there would be much less speculation  on the case

I have often wondered why they don't simply  address the issues they are clearly aware are being speculated  about  ...  they have frequently bemoaned how harmful they feel speculation is ,  afterall

Yet they stay silent and offer no explanations that would end  it

That may be true in essence, but in reality when a person tries to clarify something on a sensitive and complicated topic, it normally opens up even more questions.

If the McCanns explained their logic behind the decisions to do with the e-fits, wouldn't there be a dozen new threads here in an instant?

These things are never ending.

[pathfinder73]

There's nothing mysterious about this case. It's quite simple, a young innocent beautiful child tragically died and her death was covered up. The dogs discovered this whatever anyone claims to the contrary. And people have been played as fools/pawns which is quite easy to do. The hard part about this case is where they hid the body and the church would be my first suspicion or that guy who gave them the keys - what was his name oh yeah John Geraghty. He needs to be questioned. Where's his statement? The Renault car was stored at his house for Christ's sake.

[colombosstogey]

Hmm what happened to the peter verran thread  >@@(*&)

He asked for it to be suspended family troubles....yeh ok....

I asked him did he see Madeliene....when he mentioned that hewlett had the child or knew of the child.

Strange he met him in morocco in May when I dont think Hewlett even went there until june.

Hewlett bared no resemblance to the efits anyway any of them.....

[Benice]

No, but the act of fooling people revolts me.

The motive is essential. The McCann have one, the people we elect democratically don't.
The answering questions "must" made me laugh.

On the subject of 'fooling people' which you raise Anne - no-one reading Amaral's book would have the slightest clue from from a single word in that book -  that he had never met or spoken to the McCanns in his life - in fact quite the opposite impression is encouraged from beginning to end. 

A perfect example of deliberately 'fooling people'  IMO.

[ferryman]

On the subject of 'fooling people' which you raise Anne - no-one reading Amaral's book would have the slightest clue from from a single word in that book -  that he had never met or spoken to the McCanns in his life - in fact quite the opposite impression is encouraged from beginning to end. 

A perfect example of deliberately 'fooling people'  IMO.

It is.

A much more serious example is the way that Amaral misrepresented the role of Mark Harrison in the investigation.

And why did Amaral lie that "no one talked about murder"?

[Wonderfulspam]

That may be true in essence, but in reality when a person tries to clarify something on a sensitive and complicated topic, it normally opens up even more questions.

If the McCanns explained their logic behind the decisions to do with the e-fits, wouldn't there be a dozen new threads here in an instant?

These things are never ending.

What possible logical reason could there be in not displaying efits of the man suspected of 'abducting' your precious child, the child you have encouraged the rest of the world to look for, pray for, remember & don't forget about?