Author Topic: The Sunday Times Apologises...yet e-fits withheld from public view for 5 years?  (Read 32492 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Redblossom

  • Guest
Mr Oldfield's visit at 9:30, even if he signed his statement, is not credible : too many discrepancies apart from the fact that none of the group said he was asked to do a visual check.
Fake 100 per cent
« Last Edit: December 29, 2013, 09:03:19 PM by Redblossom »

Offline Sherlock Holmes

These are from police statements that are signed.

Yes but it's still not enough for causal links.

Open window and gusts of wind are another possible factor..

Offline pathfinder73

That would close the door not open it.
Smithman carrying a child in his arms checked his watch after passing the Smith family and the time was 10:03. Both are still unidentified 10 years later.

Offline pathfinder73

Fake 100 per cent

I don't believe Matt lied about his 9.30 check for the McCann's.
Smithman carrying a child in his arms checked his watch after passing the Smith family and the time was 10:03. Both are still unidentified 10 years later.

AnneGuedes

  • Guest

Open window and gusts of wind are another possible factor..
No fingerprints on the window apart from...

Offline pathfinder73

Look at Matt's name taken out 9.30pm check with Gerald written at the bottom of the timeline possibly meaning his timeline version.

Smithman carrying a child in his arms checked his watch after passing the Smith family and the time was 10:03. Both are still unidentified 10 years later.

Redblossom

  • Guest
I don't believe Matt lied about his 9.30 check for the McCann's.

Why is his statement full of shyte then? About it?

Catch up  tomorrow xx nite nite
« Last Edit: December 29, 2013, 09:17:26 PM by Redblossom »

Offline Sherlock Holmes

That would close the door not open it.

True

We're getting a little off topic though....

AnneGuedes

  • Guest
I don't believe Matt lied about his 9.30 check for the McCann's.
Then he lied to the McCanns and therefore had to lie to the PJ.
He described his bedroom, two windows, green curtains.. He could see only one twin.. He couldn't see that child breathing (lying on its stomach).. he omitted the empty bed under the window...
Totally discredited.

Offline Luz

So we are all very happy around here, are we not?

The poor old Times made a mistake, has it? NOT

It seems we are back at when the Carter Ruck was beating every paper that wrote out off the two lines page.

Let's see how the NSY deals with the fact that, even with the Times apology, they have been sitting on the Exton info released since 2009. If Madeleine was alive, this waiting would be devastating.

Offline pathfinder73

Yes he did Gerry a big favour here didn't he?

4078 "Okay. So take me through from there then, what happened after that?"

Reply "So, erm, back to the table, erm, we have, oh, back to the table, Gerry got up to go and, to go and check on his kids, I mean, and I'd come back and said, you know, I didn't hear any noise when I listened outside your room, so I thought it was a little bit odd that, you know, not kind of a wounded pride that he sort of didn't trust me, but, erm, I just thought, oh, you know, I've just checked you don't really need to check and sort of, you know, sort of go back, but, erm, he sort of got up and went back to check on, erm, on his kids. But, you know, you don't, you know, we're all sort of responsible for our own children and you wouldn't sort of say, you know, you don't need to do that, I just sort of felt, oh I've listened, you don't need to do that because I've kind of just done it, but I hadn't gone into the apartment, so, erm".

4078 "Did you actually say that or you just thought that to yourself?"

Reply "Yeah, I thought that, you know, I'd said that everything was sort of quiet, I listened outside the shutters, but, you know, they went back up, erm, and said he was going to check.
Smithman carrying a child in his arms checked his watch after passing the Smith family and the time was 10:03. Both are still unidentified 10 years later.

AnneGuedes

  • Guest
Look at Matt's name taken out 9.30pm check with Gerald written at the bottom of the timeline possibly meaning his timeline version.
It's not Mr McCann's signature nor writing.
A study of those two time-lines has shown that the timeline without Mr Oldfield's check is the first one.

Offline Luz

Luz, they were scared, al-right, but I really think that they were all horrified with what they believed had happened to Madeleine.


If they were afraid they made a good job at hiding it. Until now nobody heard about them anymore.

They made sure their asses were never to be back in Portugal and didn't bother about the poor missing child. >Marvelous people!

Offline pegasus

BTW would anyone agree that these two efits of same man are likely to have been done for the PIs by witnesses MS and AS?
If so is it possible to work out which efit is by which witness?

Offline Sherlock Holmes

BTW would anyone agree that these two efits of same man are likely to have been done for the PIs by witnesses MS and AS?
If so is it possible to work out which efit is by which witness?

Interesting question, pegasus. What do you think is the significance of which witness did which e-fit?