Now its the Press who hampered the search!

[jassi]

Don't be ridiculous. No one knows how important these E Fits might be.  Especially as they are supposedly of the same  man.
Your grasp of the situation is tenuous, to say the least.

Mr Redwood seemed quite keen on them, not so long back, so they must have been considered important, else they would never have been featured on Crimewatch.

[Eleanor]

Mr Redwood seemed quite keen on them, not so long back, so they must have been considered important, else they would never have been featured on Crimewatch.

Oh really.  According to some, all of the E Fits are rubbish.  What is so special about these?  I heard gales of laughter when they first appeared.

[Admin]

There are several overlaps in topics presently so please ensure that when you post that your comment is relevant to the header or opening post.  Posts which are obviously inappropriate will be moved.

[Lyall]

Mr Redwood seemed quite keen on them, not so long back, so they must have been considered important, else they would never have been featured on Crimewatch.

Ah they might have, jassi... if they had nothing else to show the public >@@(*&)

[jassi]

Oh really.  According to some, all of the E Fits are rubbish.  What is so special about these?  I heard gales of laughter when they first appeared.

I'm not saying there's anything special about them, but if the 'top cop' features them as important, then who are we  to say otherwise?

[Lyall]

Oh really.  According to some, all of the E Fits are rubbish.  What is so special about these?  I heard gales of laughter when they first appeared.

They might well be special because it's possible some people didn't want the public to ever see them.

[Redblossom]

I think this is in response to some "spanning" of the facebook account by a group of Amaral supporters.  Rather sad that some get their jollies by spamming the facebook page for a missing little girl. 

But each to their own.

Err hang on. For starters did you see what these messages were? How do you just assume they were from "Amaral supporters" ? How do you know they were spamming and also how do you know it wasnt just a couple questions from anyone about what the daily mail, star, etc have printed? Why so quick to jump with so many assumptions and accusations?

[Jean-Pierre]

Err hang on. For starters did you see what these messages were? How do you just assume they were from "Amaral supporters" ? How do you know they were spamming and also how do you know it wasnt just a couple questions from anyone about what the daily mail, star, etc have printed? Why so quick to jump with so many assumptions and accusations?

Because I could read posts on a couple of other forums (of an anti persuasion), firstly from posters crowing about how clever they were to get some posts listed on the facebook site, and subsequently from posters complaining about how their posts had been removed from the site. 

But if you want to live in fantasy land, where nobody would think of trolling a missing little girls factebook site, then be my guest. 

[Redblossom]

Because I could read posts on a couple of other forums (of an anti persuasion), firstly from posters crowing about how clever they were to get some posts listed on the facebook site, and subsequently from posters complaining about how their posts had been removed from the site. 

But if you want to live in fantasy land, where nobody would think of trolling a missing little girls factebook site, then be my guest.

So prove it

[Kazcutt]

The press were disgusting back in 2007 I can remember buying a few papers a day and in one occasion the headline I. One was Madeleine dead then on the other Madeleine alive
No one can defend the press they made millions out of Madeleine just like the express with Diana

[Jean-Pierre]

So prove it

My dear Red.  I merely posted in response to your (and others) allegation with one of the reasons for the webmasters response.  Your rather juvenile challenge of "prove it" is not worthy of your undoubted intelligence.  As is your assertion that the webmeasters response may be used by Amaral's defence team in the libel trial.


 

[Wonderfulspam]

My dear Red.  I merely posted in response to your (and others) allegation with one of the reasons for the webmasters response.  Your rather juvenile challenge of "prove it" is not worthy of your undoubted intelligence.  As is your assertion that the webmeasters response may be used by Amaral's defence team in the libel trial.

Pompous piffle.

[Redblossom]

The press were disgusting back in 2007 I can remember buying a few papers a day and in one occasion the headline I. One was Madeleine dead then on the other Madeleine alive
No one can defend the press they made millions out of Madeleine just like the express with Diana

yep, and the mccanns got compensated for it....just short of a million quid they got.....The issue at hand is different....theyare complaining about the press now...just wondering which bits..

[Mr Gray]

My dear Red.  I merely posted in response to your (and others) allegation with one of the reasons for the webmasters response.  Your rather juvenile challenge of "prove it" is not worthy of your undoubted intelligence.  As is your assertion that the webmeasters response may be used by Amaral's defence team in the libel trial.

 They probably will use it as they have very little else

[Redblossom]

My dear Red.  I merely posted in response to your (and others) allegation with one of the reasons for the webmasters response.  Your rather juvenile challenge of "prove it" is not worthy of your undoubted intelligence.  As is your assertion that the webmeasters response may be used by Amaral's defence team in the libel trial.

No you merely posted saying it was a bunch of amaral supporters...no back up, no facts, thats all

Ps JP I never said anywhere the webmasters posts would be used by amarals defence team......so why say it was my assertion? Keep up old chum

Oh and pps prove it means back up....if you think asking for  back up for statements is juvenile, well, what can i say...crummy posts from decrepit vile cesspit sites dont count here.....