« previous next »
Pages: 1 ... 16 17 [18]   Go Down

Author Topic: Innocentman came forward in 2007!  (Read 52034 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

AnneGuedes

  • Guest
Re: Innocentman came forward in 2007!
« Reply #255 on: January 26, 2014, 05:42:40 PM »
Quote from: Estuarine on January 26, 2014, 04:24:54 PM
The abduction theory still reigns which ipso fatso (yes I know!) will lead to briefing against The Met; which is happening already........whether that is a smart move or a desperate one remains to seen.
No comment.
Logged

Offline jassi

Re: Innocentman came forward in 2007!
« Reply #256 on: January 26, 2014, 05:59:09 PM »
Quote from: AnneGuedes on January 26, 2014, 05:42:40 PM
No comment.

Isn't that Gerry's line ?  8)--))
Logged
I believe everything. And l believe nothing.
I suspect everyone. And l suspect no one.
I gather the facts, examine the clues... and before   you know it, the case is solved!"

Or maybe not -

OG have been pushed out by the Germans who have reserved all the deck chairs for the foreseeable future

AnneGuedes

  • Guest
Re: Innocentman came forward in 2007!
« Reply #257 on: January 26, 2014, 06:28:53 PM »
Quote from: jassi on January 26, 2014, 05:59:09 PM
Isn't that Gerry's line ?  8)--))
?{)(**
Some learn faster than others..
Logged

Offline Sherlock Holmes

Re: Innocentman came forward in 2007!
« Reply #258 on: January 26, 2014, 07:58:46 PM »
Quote from: AnneGuedes on January 26, 2014, 05:40:37 PM
For the sake of that poor Ms Tanner, forget about Tannerman. He played no part in taking Madeleine away. Smithman did.

I'm not getting at Jane Tanner. She was just a reporter.

She reported what she saw to the relevant authorities and it was up to them to deal with the information as they saw fit.
Logged

AnneGuedes

  • Guest
Re: Innocentman came forward in 2007!
« Reply #259 on: January 26, 2014, 08:47:26 PM »
Quote from: Anna on January 26, 2014, 07:32:35 PM
so possibly not an English speaker
Or with a characteristic accent.
Or mute.
Logged

Offline Anna

Re: Innocentman came forward in 2007!
« Reply #260 on: January 26, 2014, 08:54:30 PM »
Quote from: AnneGuedes on January 26, 2014, 08:47:26 PM
Or with a characteristic accent.
Or mute.

I had thought of the accent, but not deaf , I must confess
« Last Edit: January 26, 2014, 09:05:45 PM by Anna »
Logged
“You should not honour men more than truth.”
― Plato

Offline pegasus

Re: Innocentman came forward in 2007!
« Reply #261 on: January 26, 2014, 10:06:00 PM »
Location of innocentfamily apartment approximatly near carpark to S of block G6 IMO.
However IMO JT is telling the complete truth re location/direction of sighting, and there will be a simple explanation for innocentman route.
Logged

AnneGuedes

  • Guest
Re: Innocentman came forward in 2007!
« Reply #262 on: January 26, 2014, 10:07:53 PM »
Quote from: pegasus on January 26, 2014, 10:06:00 PM
Location of innocentfamily apartment approximatly near carpark to S of block G6 IMO.
That sounds pretty DCI...
Logged

AnneGuedes

  • Guest
Re: Innocentman came forward in 2007!
« Reply #263 on: January 26, 2014, 10:09:17 PM »
Logged

Offline pegasus

Re: Innocentman came forward in 2007!
« Reply #264 on: January 30, 2014, 07:53:01 PM »
S=South
Logged

Redblossom

  • Guest
Re: Innocentman came forward in 2007!
« Reply #265 on: January 30, 2014, 07:57:05 PM »
Quote from: pegasus on January 30, 2014, 07:53:01 PM
S=South
Care to share how you worked out who it was? As from what I have read it could be ANY of three families
Logged

Offline pegasus

Re: Innocentman came forward in 2007!
« Reply #266 on: January 31, 2014, 02:15:39 PM »
I agree its not possible to identify from limited information in the published files (and even not everyone using MW facilities may not be in files) so it was an estimate which may be wrong.
Logged

Redblossom

  • Guest
Re: Innocentman came forward in 2007!
« Reply #267 on: January 31, 2014, 02:59:18 PM »
Quote from: pegasus on January 31, 2014, 02:15:39 PM
I agree its not possible to identify from limited information in the published files (and even not everyone using MW facilities may not be in files) so it was an estimate which may be wrong.

But only MW/OC guests would have used the night creche, no?
Logged

Offline pegasus

Re: Innocentman came forward in 2007!
« Reply #268 on: January 31, 2014, 03:22:57 PM »
Owners of some apartments not owned and not managed by MW/OC could pay a fee allowing occupants to use MW/OC facilities such as pools and maybe courts, but I find no indication it would include use of creches, so not sure.
Logged
Pages: 1 ... 16 17 [18]   Go Up
« previous next »