Author Topic: Was Gonçalo Amaral fair game given the content of his book?  (Read 216249 times)

0 Members and 2 Guests are viewing this topic.

Offline Eleanor

Re: Was Gonçalo Amaral fair game given the content of his book?
« Reply #225 on: February 08, 2014, 10:15:21 AM »

Who needs enemies when he's got friends like his wife?

Offline Eleanor

Re: Was Gonçalo Amaral fair game given the content of his book?
« Reply #226 on: February 08, 2014, 10:19:12 AM »
Was Sofia there?

Was she where?  I don't know.  She wrote the letter.  She went to The PJ for help.  And not for the first time.  So not all was sweetness and light in that marriage.

stephen25000

  • Guest
Re: Was Gonçalo Amaral fair game given the content of his book?
« Reply #227 on: February 08, 2014, 10:24:15 AM »
Was she where?  I don't know.  She wrote the letter.  She went to The PJ for help.  And not for the first time.  So not all was sweetness and light in that marriage.

What has Amaral's marriage to Sofia got to do with this case ?

ANSWER.......................

F.A.

Cariad

  • Guest
Re: Was Gonçalo Amaral fair game given the content of his book?
« Reply #228 on: February 08, 2014, 10:33:17 AM »
What has Amaral's marriage to Sofia got to do with this case ?

ANSWER.......................

F.A.

I don't understand some peoples obsession with Dr Amaral.

stephen25000

  • Guest
Re: Was Gonçalo Amaral fair game given the content of his book?
« Reply #229 on: February 08, 2014, 10:34:46 AM »
I don't understand some peoples obsession with Dr Amaral.


Its a defensed mechanism it seems for some supporters of the mccanns.


Offline Eleanor

Re: Was Gonçalo Amaral fair game given the content of his book?
« Reply #230 on: February 08, 2014, 10:35:27 AM »
What has Amaral's marriage to Sofia got to do with this case ?

ANSWER.......................

F.A.

The Title of this Thread is, "Was Goncalo Amaral Fair Game Given The Content of His Book?"

Estuarine

  • Guest
Re: Was Gonçalo Amaral fair game given the content of his book?
« Reply #231 on: February 08, 2014, 10:40:20 AM »
I don't understand some peoples obsession with Dr Amaral.


Every pantomime needs a Wicked Wizard. Exits in puff of green smoke.

Offline Benice

Re: Was Gonçalo Amaral fair game given the content of his book?
« Reply #232 on: February 08, 2014, 10:53:58 AM »
I don't understand some peoples obsession with Dr Amaral.

Amaral is a major part of this case we are discussing  - of course he will be commented upon.

Why is dissecting the McCanns every word and deed to the Nth degree 24/7 not seen as 'obsessional' but any mention of Amaral's words and deeds is?    That makes no sense to me.





The notion that innocence prevails over guilt – when there is no evidence to the contrary – is what separates civilization from barbarism.    Unfortunately, there are remains of barbarism among us.    Until very recently, it headed the PJ in Portimão. I hope he was the last one.
                                               Henrique Monteiro, chief editor, Expresso, Portugal

Lyall

  • Guest
Re: Was Gonçalo Amaral fair game given the content of his book?
« Reply #233 on: February 08, 2014, 11:00:09 AM »
Amaral is a major part of this case we are discussing  - of course he will be commented upon.

Why is dissecting the McCanns every word and deed to the Nth degree 24/7 not seen as 'obsessional' but any mention of Amaral's words and deeds is?    That makes no sense to me.

There's an obvious answer to that, Benice.

Offline Eleanor

Re: Was Gonçalo Amaral fair game given the content of his book?
« Reply #234 on: February 08, 2014, 11:03:06 AM »
Amaral is a major part of this case we are discussing  - of course he will be commented upon.

Why is dissecting the McCanns every word and deed to the Nth degree 24/7 not seen as 'obsessional' but any mention of Amaral's words and deeds is?    That makes no sense to me.

Especially since Amaral's life style and proclivities are so much more interesting than The McCann's.

Offline Mr Gray

Re: Was Gonçalo Amaral fair game given the content of his book?
« Reply #235 on: February 08, 2014, 11:21:02 AM »
I don't understand some peoples obsession with Dr Amaral.

I don't understand some peoples obsession with the McCanns...facebook hate group with 19000 members....and amarl has given them fuel with his shoddy detective work and his libellous book

Offline Mr Gray

Re: Was Gonçalo Amaral fair game given the content of his book?
« Reply #236 on: February 08, 2014, 11:24:36 AM »

Every pantomime needs a Wicked Wizard. Exits in puff of green smoke.

You may regard the disappearance and potential death of a child...the hounding of her innocent parents on the internet...as a pantomime...says a lot about you

Estuarine

  • Guest
Re: Was Gonçalo Amaral fair game given the content of his book?
« Reply #237 on: February 08, 2014, 11:27:59 AM »
I don't understand some peoples obsession with the McCanns...facebook hate group with 19000 members....and amarl has given them fuel with his shoddy detective work and his libellous book

Yet to be proven I believe. Unless you have inside track with the judge. But of course you have.

Offline jassi

Re: Was Gonçalo Amaral fair game given the content of his book?
« Reply #238 on: February 08, 2014, 11:28:29 AM »
I don't understand some peoples obsession with the McCanns...facebook hate group with 19000 members....and amarl has given them fuel with his shoddy detective work and his libellous book

Have we had the verdict already ?   @)(++(*
I believe everything. And l believe nothing.
I suspect everyone. And l suspect no one.
I gather the facts, examine the clues... and before   you know it, the case is solved!"

Or maybe not -

OG have been pushed out by the Germans who have reserved all the deck chairs for the foreseeable future

Offline Benice

Re: Was Gonçalo Amaral fair game given the content of his book?
« Reply #239 on: February 08, 2014, 11:33:00 AM »
There's an obvious answer to that, Benice.

Well if there is -  it's passed me by  - Lyall.

The 'indignation' of some people - who spend their time putting the MCanns' every word and deed under the microscope in order  to find stuff to criticise them - whilst simultaneously objecting to any criticism of Amaral - no matter how justified - is a ludicrous stance to take IMO.

'One rule for one and a different rule for another' springs to mind.

 









The notion that innocence prevails over guilt – when there is no evidence to the contrary – is what separates civilization from barbarism.    Unfortunately, there are remains of barbarism among us.    Until very recently, it headed the PJ in Portimão. I hope he was the last one.
                                               Henrique Monteiro, chief editor, Expresso, Portugal