Why did Gerry's sister expect Kate to be charged with accidental death?

[Lyall]

what about we've got no evidence so why doesn't someone write a book

That's what you guys should say to each other

[Sherlock Holmes]

That's what you guys should say to each other

I'm actually thinking about it, Lyall

[Lyall]

I'm actually thinking about it, Lyall

Go for it. I hope it's more Ludovic Kennedy than Nancy Grace though >@@(*&)

[Sherlock Holmes]

Go for it. I hope it's more Ludovic Kennedy than Nancy Grace though >@@(*&)

She's not one of my big time literary inspirations, no

[Lyall]

You could easily fill a big book with all the sound bites. But without them it may only be a small pamphlet

Just don't write another one about Kate. One is enough.

[Sherlock Holmes]

You could easily fill a big book with all the sound bites. But without them it may only be a small pamphlet

Just don't write another one about Kate. One is enough.

I think I would slant it more for an American audience. The way it the case is covered over here is quite different from how it's done in Europe. I think I would discuss different perspectives.

[Lyall]

I think I would slant it more for an American audience. The way it the case is covered over here is quite different from how it's done in Europe. I think I would discuss different perspectives.

Go for it, SH. But don't American audiences love sensationalism?

British do too more and more I guess, but we at least do not have programmes like Nancy Grace (due to regulation).

[Sherlock Holmes]

Go for it, SH. But don't American audiences love sensationalism?

British do too more and more I guess, but we at least do not have programmes like Nancy Grace (due to regulation).

They do love sensationalism, but they are also confused and intrigued when they learn that America and American perceptions are not the only things on the menu.

I actually write a few newspaper articles over here, discussing current events in America and elsewhere from a European perspective.

[Lyall]

They do love sensationalism, but they are also confused and intrigued when they learn that America and American perceptions are not the only things on the menu.

I actually write a few newspaper articles over here, discussing current events in America and elsewhere from a European perspective.

And criminal cases?

[pegasus]

IMO possibly the biggest mistake of the original investigation was targeting KM.
The evidence that this witness opened the window and shutter is easily proven to be incorrect.
As for clothes they were not being worn that night therefore in no way incriminate this witness IMO.

[pathfinder73]

That's because DP's visit at 6.30 is full of contradictions (also daily routine change). Kate said he was outside on balcony and only there for 30 seconds, DP said he was inside, Kate said she had a towel on, DP couldn't remember what she was wearing. Nobody believes a word they say about this visit. How do you know what clothes Kate was wearing at 6.45pm? It's still too early to be changed into going out dining clothes.

[pegasus]

Combine the early Aug video of the EVRD indication immediately after sniffing a shelf, with the 4th May photo of same shelf. Superimpose visually the pile (4th May photo) onto the empty shelf (Aug video). Clothes which are NOT being worn do not incriminate their owner. All IMO.

[Mr Gray]

No davel, if you had the vaguest idea  of probabliity and chaos theory, it might help your comprehension.

Its very simple to explain why you are totally wrong...air will always move from an area of high to an area of low pressure...thats what keeps aeroplanes in the sky..
Molecules move randomnly but as soon as there is the slightest unequal pressure in the room the molecules move to the lowest pressure to equalise it.

Simple example is when you blow up a balloon and release it...the high pressure air doesn't stay in the balloon...it comes out until the pressure inside the balloon is the same as the pressure outside the balloon.

In short you are totally wrong

[stephen25000]

Its very simple to explain why you are totally wrong...air will always move from an area of high to an area of low pressure...thats what keeps aeroplanes in the sky..
Molecules move randomnly but as sson as there is the slightest unequal pressure in the room the molecules move to the lowest pressure to equalise it.

Simple example is when you blow up a balloon and release it...the high pressure air doesn't stay in the balloon...it comes out until the pressure inside the balloon is the same as the pressure outside the balloon.

In short you are totally wrong

You really don't get probability or chaos theory do you.

Try READING my post again before you get a hernia.

It might help.

[Mr Gray]

You really don't get probability or chaos theory do you.

Try READING my post again before you get a hernia.

It might help.

I wont labour the point because Im sure other posters will understand my post even if you don't. You cant have an area of high and low pressure in the same room...if you were to open a window in an aeroplane all the air rushes out.....nothing to do with probability or chaos theory...what you have done is shown you don't understand simple scientific principles...how could you be a chemistry teacher...this is all off topic so best left there