Are the Tapas Rogatory statements as released by Duarte Levy genuine?

[Mr Gray]

...I understand smith  has now said he doesn't think it was Gerry...

How could he be certain it wasn't Gerry he saw, when he wasn't certain it was Gerry he saw in the first place.

have another look...I used the word think and you use the word certain

[Wonderfulspam]

have another look...I used the word think and you use the word certain

Yes, I did notice that, I seem to remember writing those very words.


So Mr Smith now thinks it wasn't Gerry he saw, I wonder what his wife thinks.

[Mr Gray]

Yes, I did notice that, I seem to remember writing those very words.


So Mr Smith now thinks it wasn't Gerry he saw, I wonder what his wife thinks.

You didn't write those words...you copied and pasted mine

[Wonderfulspam]

You didn't write those words...you copied and pasted mine

You can't prove that, I'm totally innocent of this alleged plagarism until proven guilty in a court of law.

This terrible allegation is an unwarranted attack on my decent, honourable name & reputation.

[Mr Gray]

You can't prove that, I'm totally innocent of this alleged plagarism until proven guilty in a court of law.

This terrible allegation is an unwarranted attack on my decent, honourable name & reputation.

It's true though isn't it

[Mr Gray]

Bump......for Davel.

don't need to clutch at straws...mccanns not suspects...groundhog afternoon

[jassi]

don't need to clutch at straws...mccanns not suspects...groundhog afternoon

Are you working on the principal that if you say something often enough, others might eventually believe it ?

[slartibartfast]

Because they were brought to us by a man, both with a known propensity for corruption, and, with opportunity to tamper with the files if he felt so inclined.

Also, because same said man is known to have a pronounced anti-McCann bias.

Will that do?

No.

[Mr Gray]

Are you working on the principal that if you say something often enough, others might eventually believe it ?

It is one fact that we do have...mccanns have been declared not suspects

[Mr Gray]

Because they were brought to us by a man, both with a known propensity for corruption, and, with opportunity to tamper with the files if he felt so inclined.

Also, because same said man is known to have a pronounced anti-McCann bias.

Will that do?

It will do for me

[jassi]

 Just because you, or some other say they are suspect doesn't actually alter their status, except in your mind.

You would have to prove where they are incorrect in order to devalue them.

[Mr Gray]

Just because you, or some other say they are suspect doesn't actually alter their status, except in your mind.

You would have to prove where they are incorrect in order to devalue them.

They don't have any value full stop

[jassi]

They don't have any value full stop

Fine, if that's what you choose to think, go ahead - it doesn't alter anything.

[Mr Gray]

So to clarify my position I don't see how anything from an unofficial source...particularly a source that was hostile to the McCanns can be taken as 100% correct

[John]

I wont be contacting anyone...Redwood said the mccanns aren't suspects...I understand smith  has now said he doesn't think it was Gerry...

Can you provide a statement or cite from him to that effect Dave?