Author Topic: Amaral's Hypothesis - credible or not?  (Read 126426 times)

0 Members and 4 Guests are viewing this topic.

Offline Lace

Re: Amaral's Hypothesis - credible or not?
« Reply #465 on: June 24, 2014, 11:00:43 AM »
Amaral's Hypothesis changes with the wind.

I remember Amaral watching  a video of Gerry walking on the beach by the rocks.

Amaral says to ?  [can't remember,  perhaps someone can come up with the video]   'He's not looking for crabs that's for sure'    to me meaning that he thought Gerry had hidden her on the beach.

It was proven that Gerry wouldn't have been able to throw Madeleine into the sea from the cliffs as it was said he wouldn't have been strong enough to hurl her far enough to reach the sea.

Also Gerry wouldn't have been able to dispose of Madeleine in the sea from the beach as it was low tide that night of the 3rd of May.

So where on earth could Gerry or Kate have hidden Madeleine,   taking into account they were strangers to the area.    The ground [as Amaral pointed out]   was too hard to bury someone,   the sea was low tide,   couldn't from the rocks.    Where???

Offline Eleanor

Re: Amaral's Hypothesis - credible or not?
« Reply #466 on: June 24, 2014, 11:23:16 AM »

This why Amaral was so interested in Robert Murat.  He jolly well knew that The McCanns could not have disposed of that child's body without local help.
I believe that Amaral actually threaten Robert Murat, according to Robert Murat.  But Robert Murat wasn't a local peasant, and well wise to what Amaral was up to.

Offline pegasus

Re: Amaral's Hypothesis - credible or not?
« Reply #467 on: June 24, 2014, 12:23:20 PM »
In Portugal, in 2010, there were about 110 000 deaths, the national cremation rate was around six per cent, there were 14 crematoria in mainland Portugal.
http://crematorium.eu/portugal-welcome.html

Offline pathfinder73

Re: Amaral's Hypothesis - credible or not?
« Reply #468 on: June 24, 2014, 12:42:19 PM »
Well, they can't actually check, can they.  Like most of Amaral's mad theories.

If it was underneath another person you may not see it even if the coffin was checked. They would not move and look underneath the body? If a body was hidden on the cliff face for a month then it would be badly decomposed by the time it was wrapped and took a 5 minute ride to the church.
Smithman carrying a child in his arms checked his watch after passing the Smith family and the time was 10:03. Both are still unidentified 10 years later.

Offline pegasus

Re: Amaral's Hypothesis - credible or not?
« Reply #469 on: June 24, 2014, 12:56:31 PM »
If it was underneath another person you may not see it even if the coffin was checked. They would not move and look underneath the body? If a body was hidden on the cliff face for a month then it would be badly decomposed by the time it was wrapped and took a 5 minute ride to the church.
Easily disproven. Absence of airing in the following 4 weeks in an easily observable by many carpark. My great- grandfather used to call it the dog that didn't bark concept.

Offline pathfinder73

Re: Amaral's Hypothesis - credible or not?
« Reply #470 on: June 24, 2014, 01:03:30 PM »
Easily disproven. Absence of airing in the following 4 weeks in an easily observable by many carpark. My great- grandfather used to call it the dog that didn't bark concept.

You what? By many carpark? In English please. Do people take walks down steep cliff faces?
Smithman carrying a child in his arms checked his watch after passing the Smith family and the time was 10:03. Both are still unidentified 10 years later.

Offline pegasus

Re: Amaral's Hypothesis - credible or not?
« Reply #471 on: June 24, 2014, 05:45:14 PM »
You what? By many carpark? In English please. Do people take walks down steep cliff faces?
When you said "took a 5 minute ride" I assumed you meant in the car?
And that you were taliking about the beginning of June?
If so, why was there no airing of car observed during the next 4 weeks?
The carpark were it was regularly parked throughout June was visible to many people. 

Offline pathfinder73

Re: Amaral's Hypothesis - credible or not?
« Reply #472 on: June 24, 2014, 07:04:13 PM »
When you said "took a 5 minute ride" I assumed you meant in the car?
And that you were taliking about the beginning of June?
If so, why was there no airing of car observed during the next 4 weeks?
The carpark were it was regularly parked throughout June was visible to many people. 

Because they were at the OC not a private villa. Who in their right mind would leave a car boot open with all the press camped outside. Maybe they did wait until they got to the villa.
Smithman carrying a child in his arms checked his watch after passing the Smith family and the time was 10:03. Both are still unidentified 10 years later.

Offline Eleanor

Re: Amaral's Hypothesis - credible or not?
« Reply #473 on: June 24, 2014, 07:07:00 PM »
Because they were at the OC not a private villa. Who in their right mind would leave a car boot open with all the press camped outside. Maybe they did wait until they got to the villa.

And the whole family drove around in a stinky car.  I bet.

Offline pathfinder73

Re: Amaral's Hypothesis - credible or not?
« Reply #474 on: June 24, 2014, 07:15:29 PM »
And the whole family drove around in a stinky car.  I bet.

Well they were on their travels the following week, Germany, Holland, Morocco.

8 JUNE 07 Blog

Sean, in particular has acquired a taste for sea-bass!
Smithman carrying a child in his arms checked his watch after passing the Smith family and the time was 10:03. Both are still unidentified 10 years later.

Offline pegasus

Re: Amaral's Hypothesis - credible or not?
« Reply #475 on: June 26, 2014, 12:46:12 AM »
Because they were at the OC not a private villa. Who in their right mind would leave a car boot open with all the press camped outside. Maybe they did wait until they got to the villa.
If one day you transported something (let's say hypothetically for example some bags of gardening stuff) in a van and it made the van smelly, on which day would you start airing the van? Its elementary.
« Last Edit: June 26, 2014, 05:12:11 AM by John »

Offline pathfinder73

Re: Amaral's Hypothesis - credible or not?
« Reply #476 on: June 26, 2014, 12:36:49 PM »
If one day you transported something (let's say hypothetically for example some bags of gardening stuff) in a van and it made the van smelly, on which day would you start airing the van? Its elementary.

You think the dogs alerted to bags of gardening stuff  8-)(--) Elementary my ass. Only ONE witness saw it constantly open at private villa and there was cadaver scent in the car.
« Last Edit: June 26, 2014, 12:41:03 PM by pathfinder73 »
Smithman carrying a child in his arms checked his watch after passing the Smith family and the time was 10:03. Both are still unidentified 10 years later.

Offline Eleanor

Re: Amaral's Hypothesis - credible or not?
« Reply #477 on: June 26, 2014, 12:40:31 PM »
If one day you transported something (let's say hypothetically for example some bags of gardening stuff) in a van and it made the van smelly, on which day would you start airing the van? Its elementary.

I once broke an egg on the carpet in the back of my van.  The smell was appalling.  I didn't wait four weeks to clean it up and  air the van.

Offline Eleanor

Re: Amaral's Hypothesis - credible or not?
« Reply #478 on: June 26, 2014, 12:42:35 PM »
You think the dogs alerted to bags of gardening stuff  8-)(--) Elementary my ass. Only ONE witness saw it constantly open at private villa and there was cadaver scent in the car.

You have absolutely no proof that it was Cadaver Odour.  No wonder Amaral cocked up if he was reading the likes of this rubbish, and taking it as gospel.

Offline pathfinder73

Re: Amaral's Hypothesis - credible or not?
« Reply #479 on: June 26, 2014, 01:09:06 PM »
You have absolutely no proof that it was Cadaver Odour.  No wonder Amaral cocked up if he was reading the likes of this rubbish, and taking it as gospel.

Dear oh dear. Eddie was chasing blood scent all over the car park. Keela gets in real close to alert to blood. We will see if it comes to trial.
« Last Edit: June 26, 2014, 01:11:57 PM by pathfinder73 »
Smithman carrying a child in his arms checked his watch after passing the Smith family and the time was 10:03. Both are still unidentified 10 years later.