Author Topic: So what is the evidence for abduction?  (Read 173045 times)

0 Members and 5 Guests are viewing this topic.

Offline mercury

Re: So what is the evidence for abduction?
« Reply #435 on: July 04, 2015, 10:09:37 PM »
"it is our belief, as experienced investigators - on the evidence, that, um that you know, that that, that is as a criminal act - and that has been, you know, undertaken by by a stranger

Better said in TOTAL context don't you thnk?

Offline Brietta

Re: So what is the evidence for abduction?
« Reply #436 on: July 04, 2015, 10:16:43 PM »

In my opinion there is a bit of an infantile WUM campaign ongoing.  It lends nothing to the debate because it is not designed to do so.  It lends nothing to the forum because it is designed not to.
"All I'm going to say is that we've conducted a very serious investigation and there's no indication that Madeleine McCann's parents are connected to her disappearance. On the other hand, we have a lot of evidence pointing out that Christian killed her," Wolter told the "Friday at 9"....

Alfred R Jones

  • Guest
Re: So what is the evidence for abduction?
« Reply #437 on: July 04, 2015, 10:21:01 PM »
Better said in TOTAL context don't you thnk?
How would it alter the meaning of the sentence I quoted to add in all the other stuff he said?

Offline mercury

Re: So what is the evidence for abduction?
« Reply #438 on: July 04, 2015, 10:24:02 PM »
How would it alter the meaning of the sentence I quoted to add in all the other stuff he said?

As I  said, context and full meaning, you believe he said one definite thing I don't, shall have to agree to disagree

Offline mercury

Re: So what is the evidence for abduction?
« Reply #439 on: July 04, 2015, 10:25:26 PM »
In my opinion there is a bit of an infantile WUM campaign ongoing.  It lends nothing to the debate because it is not designed to do so.  It lends nothing to the forum because it is designed not to.

care to explain in straightforward English? ta!

In your own time of course
« Last Edit: July 04, 2015, 11:05:44 PM by mercury »

Alfred R Jones

  • Guest
Re: So what is the evidence for abduction?
« Reply #440 on: July 04, 2015, 10:48:49 PM »
English language has subjects objects, verbs etc. They believe. Who do? The experienced investigators. What do they believe? That 'that' is a criminal act undertaken by stranger. What is 'that'? It's the removal of Madeleine alive from the apartment in a gap in the timeline. They believe it's a criminal act, not they believe it happened.
@)(++(* So they don't believe stranger abduction happened now?  And you got that from what Redwood said?!  O lawdy!!

Alfred R Jones

  • Guest
Re: So what is the evidence for abduction?
« Reply #441 on: July 04, 2015, 10:51:59 PM »
In my opinion there is a bit of an infantile WUM campaign ongoing.  It lends nothing to the debate because it is not designed to do so.  It lends nothing to the forum because it is designed not to.
I've never known such absurd twisting of the facts, it's utterly desperate and pathetically sad.
« Last Edit: July 04, 2015, 11:00:09 PM by Alfred R Jones »

Offline mercury

Re: So what is the evidence for abduction?
« Reply #442 on: July 04, 2015, 11:04:05 PM »
I've never known such absurd twisting of the facts, it's utterly desperate and pathetically sad.

the fact remains.. redwood didn't say he believed Madeleine was abducted by a stranger,get over it

Alfred R Jones

  • Guest
Re: So what is the evidence for abduction?
« Reply #443 on: July 04, 2015, 11:05:40 PM »
the fact remains.. redwood didn't say he believed Madeleine was abducted by a stranger,get over it
He most certainly did.  By your interpretation Could you kindly explain why you think it was necessary for Redwood to point out that a stranger removing Madeleine from the apartment would constitute a criminal act? 

Offline mercury

Re: So what is the evidence for abduction?
« Reply #444 on: July 04, 2015, 11:07:34 PM »
He most certainly did.  By your interpretation Could you kindly explain why you think it was necessary for Redwood to point out that a stranger removing Madeleine from the apartment would constitute a criminal act?

Well, that's the question , and he didn't mention Madeleine..plus all he talked about was possibilities

Alfred R Jones

  • Guest
Re: So what is the evidence for abduction?
« Reply #445 on: July 04, 2015, 11:09:31 PM »
Well, that's the question , and he didn't mention Madeleine..plus all he talked about was possibilities
Here's another question for you: if he didn't believe Madeleine was removed in a criminal act by a stranger and that she may be alive why did he release an age progression picture of her?

Offline mercury

Re: So what is the evidence for abduction?
« Reply #446 on: July 04, 2015, 11:13:11 PM »
Here's another question for you: if he didn't believe Madeleine was removed in a criminal act by a stranger and that she may be alive why did he release an age progression picture of her?
Don't be so naive Alfie

SY have no leads
They (he) bleated they did
they didn't
An age progression pic is a PR exercise
AR is now retired in a handsome pension
Pity he didn't really get to the bottom of it
let's see if Wall does anything

Have you not heard about the Mccanncurse!

Alfred R Jones

  • Guest
Re: So what is the evidence for abduction?
« Reply #447 on: July 04, 2015, 11:13:31 PM »
Here's another question: why did all the UK papers reach the same conclusion about the meaning of Redwood's words as me, Ferryman, Brietta, etc?

Alfred R Jones

  • Guest
Re: So what is the evidence for abduction?
« Reply #448 on: July 04, 2015, 11:14:46 PM »
Don't be so naive Alfie

SY have no leads
They (he) bleated they did
they didn't
An age progression pic is a PR exercise
AR is now retired in a handsome pension
Pity he didn't really get to the bottom of it
let's see if Wall does anything
So Andy Redwood's a liar too is he?

Alfred R Jones

  • Guest
Re: So what is the evidence for abduction?
« Reply #449 on: July 04, 2015, 11:20:56 PM »
Never said that you really should not put words to people's mouths alf

Have to go out for an hour, hopefully when I come back you will have calmed down
You said he bleated about having leads but that they didn't have leads.  So, is that not lying in your book?