So what is the evidence for abduction?

[G-Unit]

So in your opinion Mr Amaral's theory about accidental death and parental involvement has not been discarded ??

I prefer to think the present inquiries are following the evidence to find the actual perpetrator of the crime and in my opinion that evidence seems to be directing them away from the mistakes of the initial investigation and towards apprehending an abductor.

If you think differently ... fine by me.

None of that provides any evidence to support the abduction theory, as per the thread title. You can think anything you like, but as we don't know what the investigators are investigating it's simply guesswork on your part.

[stephen25000]

I think the theory of accidental death and parental involvement has been well and truly discarded and I think the first competent investigation to do so was Rebelo's. 

Two other investigations working independently of each other have also discarded the original flawed theory.  So that makes it three against one.

It stands to reason these professionals are investigating Madeleine McCann's abduction based on all the accurate evidence they have to hand, some of which has come in post the archiving of the case.

So walked and wandered seems to have been put aside, accidental death also ... what does that leave?

Why is it a flawed theory, merely on your say so ?

As a reminder yet again, the crime as unknown.

There are the indications of the dogs, neither confirmed nor contradicted by forensics.

The professionals as you call them have found nothing as regards abduction.

For if believe they have, you are dreaming.

The abduction is a belief/theory for some and without which,  can lead in one clear direction.

[Brietta]

None of that provides any evidence to support the abduction theory, as per the thread title. You can think anything you like, but as we don't know what the investigators are investigating it's simply guesswork on your part.

My guesswork has some foundation in fact.

Yours and Mr Amaral's guesswork has been investigated ... not least by the man himself ... and has proven to be worthless.

What better evidence for abduction than two police authorities looking for an abductor?

[Mr Gray]

None of that provides any evidence to support the abduction theory, as per the thread title. You can think anything you like, but as we don't know what the investigators are investigating it's simply guesswork on your part.

we do ...sy have said mccanns not suspects...no guesswork

[stephen25000]

My guesswork has some foundation in fact.

Yours and Mr Amaral's guesswork has been investigated ... not least by the man himself ... and has proven to be worthless.

What better evidence for abduction than two police authorities looking for an abductor?

and they have found what exactly ???

Accidental death theory Worthless ?

Only to those who spread abduction.

[G-Unit]

My guesswork has some foundation in fact.

Yours and Mr Amaral's guesswork has been investigated ... not least by the man himself ... and has proven to be worthless.

What better evidence for abduction than two police authorities looking for an abductor?

I don't have a theory, thank you. i have a few possibilities which, given the facts, could have happened. There's no point in mentioning Amaral that I can see. Have the police told us they're looking for an abductor?

[Brietta]

and they have found what exactly ???

Accidental death theory Worthless ?

Only to those who spread abduction.

                                   £5%4%                                                                 
                                                               That will be inclusive of the PJ and SY. 

[John]

So in your opinion Mr Amaral's theory about accidental death and parental involvement has not been discarded ??

I prefer to think the present inquiries are following the evidence to find the actual perpetrator of the crime and in my opinion that evidence seems to be directing them away from the mistakes of the initial investigation and towards apprehending an abductor.

If you think differently ... fine by me.

I have always said that Brietta, they are seeking someone to pin it on rather than looking for a missing child and that is why a reward has not now been offered for her safe return. 

[stephen25000]

                                   £5%4%                                                                 
                                                               That will be inclusive of the PJ and SY.

and these marvellous detectives have found ….......

Oh I know, NOTHING. 

They've proved excellent at that, especially not knowing the crime.

[jassi]

and these marvellous detectives have found ….......

Oh I know, NOTHING. 

They've proved excellent at that, especially not knowing the crime.

They've got some holes they've been looking into, though.

[Alfred R Jones]

It would appear so.

Such arrogance.

[stephen25000]

They've got some holes they've been looking into, though.

 

[Alfred R Jones]

I am sure you are right. If only we knew what those subsequent actions were I guess we would be better informed.

Seriously?  You have no idea of any action taken by Op Grange since the 2012 announcement? 

[Alfred R Jones]

I don't have a theory, thank you. i have a few possibilities which, given the facts, could have happened. There's no point in mentioning Amaral that I can see. Have the police told us they're looking for an abductor?

You've obviously forgotten the Op Grange remit which uses the word abduction.

[G-Unit]

we do ...sy have said mccanns not suspects...no guesswork

Well that's OK then, because the police would never mislead us, would they?

28/01/2009 Police say Mr Prout is not suspected of murdering his wife.
10/03/2009 Mr Prout arrested and charged with his wife's murder.
5/02/2010 Mr Prout found guilty of his wife's murder.