Author Topic: So what is the evidence for abduction?  (Read 167997 times)

0 Members and 2 Guests are viewing this topic.

Offline Mr Gray

Re: So what is the evidence for abduction?
« Reply #600 on: July 09, 2015, 01:45:48 PM »
You know nothing about me davel, and never will. Your assumptions are mistaken, amusing and are not taken seriously.

My conclusions about you are based on your posts and are not assumptions

Offline Mr Gray

Re: So what is the evidence for abduction?
« Reply #601 on: July 09, 2015, 01:54:45 PM »
I am not a fan of the McCanns but I respect them enough to always refer to their daughter as Madeleine, because Kate McCann says they never shortened her name. We don't know what evidence the police have, and any evidence which SY collect has to be presented to the Portuguese authorities who will then decide whether to act upon it or not. If they say no, SY can't do anything about it themselves unless it points to a British person committing a serious crime. They have no authority to arrest any Portuguese people.

I want justice for Madeleine, but I also want to be sure that the investigations reach the correct conclusions and arrest and charge the correct people. SY have failed to do this in some cases, as have the PJ, so I'm happy to have both police forces working on the case as that's the best way to arrive at the correct conclusions.

Whatever charge is finally brought is fine by me so long as the evidence is clear and stands up in court. I will be surprised if abduction is the charge, because there was no evidence of it at the time, but if the two police forces find it, fair enough.

I cannot see how questioning their honesty...as you do...is showing them respect

stephen25000

  • Guest
Re: So what is the evidence for abduction?
« Reply #602 on: July 09, 2015, 01:58:47 PM »
I cannot see how questioning their honesty...as you do...is showing them respect

How do you know the mccanns have told the truth ?

Offline Alice Purjorick

Re: So what is the evidence for abduction?
« Reply #603 on: July 09, 2015, 02:02:59 PM »
How do you know the mccanns have told the truth ?

Winwood ,Clapton, Baker & Grech maybe?
"Navigating the difference between weird but normal grief and truly suspicious behaviour is the key for any detective worth his salt.". ….Sarah Bailey

Offline Mr Gray

Re: So what is the evidence for abduction?
« Reply #604 on: July 09, 2015, 02:15:51 PM »
How do you know the mccanns have told the truth ?

it's a matter of judgement....taking everything into consideration and reaching a conclusion...that's what SY will have done

Offline Anna

Re: So what is the evidence for abduction?
« Reply #605 on: July 09, 2015, 02:28:13 PM »
Simple as that? Not through the window, it seems, so why?

Whoever entered 5A and took Madeleine, IMO would probably have used the front door, which was hidden from view because of where it is situated and the trees served to cover any activity in that area.

Whether she was then passed out of the window or removed via the door and passed over the wall by the passageway to another person, waiting to go off with her, is unknown.
As we all know, she was removed by someone, that's for sure.
“You should not honour men more than truth.”
― Plato

Offline G-Unit

Re: So what is the evidence for abduction?
« Reply #606 on: July 09, 2015, 02:46:44 PM »
I cannot see how questioning their honesty...as you do...is showing them respect

I have quoted examples where their stories have changed. I have quoted examples where what they say is contradicted by other witness statements. I have made no unsupported allegations, I have cites for what I say.
Read and abide by the forum rules.
Result = happy posting.
Ignore and break the rules
Result = edits, deletions and unhappiness
http://miscarriageofjustice.co/index.php?board=2.0

Offline Mr Gray

Re: So what is the evidence for abduction?
« Reply #607 on: July 09, 2015, 02:50:33 PM »
I have quoted examples where their stories have changed. I have quoted examples where what they say is contradicted by other witness statements. I have made no unsupported allegations, I have cites for what I say.

I don't believe their stories have changed...you are accusing them falsely.....all your allegations are based on twice translated files...which are not accurate

Offline G-Unit

Re: So what is the evidence for abduction?
« Reply #608 on: July 09, 2015, 04:28:38 PM »
I don't believe their stories have changed...you are accusing them falsely.....all your allegations are based on twice translated files...which are not accurate

Well, lets face it. You only believe two things. The McCanns are innocent. Madeleine was abducted. The coloboma debacle. Nothing to do with the files. Look, look, look into my eyes...the right eye.
Read and abide by the forum rules.
Result = happy posting.
Ignore and break the rules
Result = edits, deletions and unhappiness
http://miscarriageofjustice.co/index.php?board=2.0

Offline Mr Gray

Re: So what is the evidence for abduction?
« Reply #609 on: July 09, 2015, 04:32:47 PM »
Well, lets face it. You only believe two things. The McCanns are innocent. Madeleine was abducted. The coloboma debacle. Nothing to do with the files. Look, look, look into my eyes...the right eye.

talking of eyes...I think you must be blind....

there's no coloboma debacle...just more of your imagination

the files contain statements that have been translated twice over so are not accurate

stephen25000

  • Guest
Re: So what is the evidence for abduction?
« Reply #610 on: July 09, 2015, 05:19:44 PM »
talking of eyes...I think you must be blind....

there's no coloboma debacle...just more of your imagination

the files contain statements that have been translated twice over so are not accurate

There was a debacle.

The mccanns were told/advised not to engage with it.

They still did.

Offline Brietta

Re: So what is the evidence for abduction?
« Reply #611 on: July 09, 2015, 05:20:17 PM »
I have quoted examples where their stories have changed. I have quoted examples where what they say is contradicted by other witness statements. I have made no unsupported allegations, I have cites for what I say.

You are working from a very flawed basis indeed.  Reading two or three mistranslated sentences of Dostoyevsky  does not equate with understanding the plot of The Idiot.
"All I'm going to say is that we've conducted a very serious investigation and there's no indication that Madeleine McCann's parents are connected to her disappearance. On the other hand, we have a lot of evidence pointing out that Christian killed her," Wolter told the "Friday at 9"....

stephen25000

  • Guest
Re: So what is the evidence for abduction?
« Reply #612 on: July 09, 2015, 05:23:12 PM »
You are working from a very flawed basis indeed.  Reading two or three mistranslated sentences of Dostoyevsky  does not equate with understanding the plot of The Idiot.

That is your opinion and hardly surprising.

Offline G-Unit

Re: So what is the evidence for abduction?
« Reply #613 on: July 09, 2015, 05:58:44 PM »
There was a debacle.

The mccanns were told/advised not to engage with it.

They still did.

Then shrugged it off on the Piers Morgan show 'we didn't make much of it really'. Really? All those posters showing her eye. The appeal on the Lancet website to health professionals to look for her coloboma.  @)(++(*
Read and abide by the forum rules.
Result = happy posting.
Ignore and break the rules
Result = edits, deletions and unhappiness
http://miscarriageofjustice.co/index.php?board=2.0

stephen25000

  • Guest
Re: So what is the evidence for abduction?
« Reply #614 on: July 09, 2015, 06:41:04 PM »
Then shrugged it off on the Piers Morgan show 'we didn't make much of it really'. Really? All those posters showing her eye. The appeal on the Lancet website to health professionals to look for her coloboma.  @)(++(*

Someone should tell gerry, it was a bad marketing ploy. *&*%£