Author Topic: So what is the evidence for abduction?  (Read 167868 times)

0 Members and 2 Guests are viewing this topic.

Offline Mr Gray

Re: So what is the evidence for abduction?
« Reply #615 on: July 09, 2015, 06:43:58 PM »
Then shrugged it off on the Piers Morgan show 'we didn't make much of it really'. Really? All those posters showing her eye. The appeal on the Lancet website to health professionals to look for her coloboma.  @)(++(*

you show you have no respect for Maddie the way you mock the search for her...we can all see exactly what you are.
finishing your post re the coloboma with a smiley. For the record I have never heard the mccanns use the word coloboma...not that it would matter if they did

Offline Benice

Re: So what is the evidence for abduction?
« Reply #616 on: July 09, 2015, 06:51:17 PM »
Then shrugged it off on the Piers Morgan show 'we didn't make much of it really'. Really? All those posters showing her eye. The appeal on the Lancet website to health professionals to look for her coloboma.  @)(++(*


The first mention of it came from the PJ in a Press release on 5th May.


http://www.mccannpjfiles.co.uk/P1/01_VOLUME_Ia_Page_32.jpg

From the PJ

To: The Assistant Prosecutor
Public Ministry

Date: 04-05-2007

Subject: Request for Divulgation by means of the Press

As it is of clear interest to the investigation of the case in reference, I have the honour to ask you to authorise the divulgation of the disappearance of the young girl Madeleine McCann by means of the organs of the press, with the aim of obtaining information leading to her whereabouts.

I enclose a model for divulgation.

With best compliments

The Coordinator of the Investigation.

G. Amaral


Permission was granted for the release of the Press Release.



01 Processos Vol I Page 33 B

Press Release

Disappearance of Minor

The Policia Judiciaria requests information about the whereabouts of Madeleine Beth McCann, born on 12-05-2003 (three years old) with the following physical characteristics: 90 cm in height, light chestnut/blond hair, blue/green left eye and a green right eye with a brown mark in the pupil.

She disappeared from Praia da Luz, Lagos on 03-05-2007 wearing pyjamas with white coloured bottoms with a floral design and a blue and grey figure on the front with the inscription ‘EEYORE’.

Any information should be directed to the Head of the Faro PJ telephone number 289 884 500 or to the Portimao DIC tel 282 405 400.

05 May 2007
The notion that innocence prevails over guilt – when there is no evidence to the contrary – is what separates civilization from barbarism.    Unfortunately, there are remains of barbarism among us.    Until very recently, it headed the PJ in Portimão. I hope he was the last one.
                                               Henrique Monteiro, chief editor, Expresso, Portugal

Offline Carana

Re: So what is the evidence for abduction?
« Reply #617 on: July 09, 2015, 07:03:33 PM »

The first mention of it came from the PJ in a Press release on 5th May.


http://www.mccannpjfiles.co.uk/P1/01_VOLUME_Ia_Page_32.jpg

From the PJ

To: The Assistant Prosecutor
Public Ministry

Date: 04-05-2007

Subject: Request for Divulgation by means of the Press

As it is of clear interest to the investigation of the case in reference, I have the honour to ask you to authorise the divulgation of the disappearance of the young girl Madeleine McCann by means of the organs of the press, with the aim of obtaining information leading to her whereabouts.

I enclose a model for divulgation.

With best compliments

The Coordinator of the Investigation.

G. Amaral


Permission was granted for the release of the Press Release.



01 Processos Vol I Page 33 B

Press Release

Disappearance of Minor

The Policia Judiciaria requests information about the whereabouts of Madeleine Beth McCann, born on 12-05-2003 (three years old) with the following physical characteristics: 90 cm in height, light chestnut/blond hair, blue/green left eye and a green right eye with a brown mark in the pupil.

She disappeared from Praia da Luz, Lagos on 03-05-2007 wearing pyjamas with white coloured bottoms with a floral design and a blue and grey figure on the front with the inscription ‘EEYORE’.

Any information should be directed to the Head of the Faro PJ telephone number 289 884 500 or to the Portimao DIC tel 282 405 400.

05 May 2007

Strangely, Amaral's pals all said that the parents had signed her death warrant by releasing the detail about her eye, when in fact getting that organised is one of the few things that Amaral actually appears to have organised (relatively) quickly.


Offline Mr Gray

Re: So what is the evidence for abduction?
« Reply #618 on: July 09, 2015, 07:47:09 PM »
Strangely, Amaral's pals all said that the parents had signed her death warrant by releasing the detail about her eye, when in fact getting that organised is one of the few things that Amaral actually appears to have organised (relatively) quickly.

shows how stupid amaral was...if maddie was taken by a paedophile she was dead anyway...if maddie was taken as a child for a childless couple...they would not harm her

stephen25000

  • Guest
Re: So what is the evidence for abduction?
« Reply #619 on: July 09, 2015, 07:55:09 PM »
shows how stupid amaral was...if maddie was taken by a paedophile she was dead anyway...if maddie was taken as a child for a childless couple...they would not harm her

The blame game yet again.


Always Amaral.
« Last Edit: July 09, 2015, 08:04:28 PM by Eleanor »

Offline G-Unit

Re: So what is the evidence for abduction?
« Reply #620 on: July 09, 2015, 08:11:28 PM »
you show you have no respect for Maddie the way you mock the search for her...we can all see exactly what you are.
finishing your post re the coloboma with a smiley. For the record I have never heard the mccanns use the word coloboma...not that it would matter if they did

Of course it wouldn't because they're allowed to say what they like. I'm sure it was on the posters against their will, and in the Lancet. SY believed it and asked NZ police to DNA test a little girl because of it. All that fuss and publicity for something that never was? Not once did they speak out with a correction until the Piers Morgan interview.

http://gerrymccan-abuseofpower-humanrights.blogspot.co.uk/2011/06/kate-and-gerry-mccann-why-have-they.html

The Lancet;

The McCann family has asked health professionals to look out for Madeleine McCann, a 4-year-old English girl with a coloboma of her right iris, who was abducted while on holiday in Praia Da Luz, Portugal, on May 3, 2007.

It caused this too;

She had the same rare eye defect as McCann called Coloboma that makes the iris look like it's split, according to Radio New Zealand.

"Following a DNA submission, we are now satisfied that the girl identified is not Madeleine McCann," said a spokeswoman for London's Metropolitan Police, according to the New Zealand Herald.

Scotland Yard requested assistance from New Zealand law enforcement to rule out that the possibility that the unidentified youngster was McCann. Their investigation into McCann's disappearance is called Operation Grange.
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/02/13/madeleine-mccann-dna-new-zealand_n_2681725.html
Read and abide by the forum rules.
Result = happy posting.
Ignore and break the rules
Result = edits, deletions and unhappiness
http://miscarriageofjustice.co/index.php?board=2.0

Offline Miss Taken Identity

Re: So what is the evidence for abduction?
« Reply #621 on: July 09, 2015, 08:47:48 PM »
Strangely, Amaral's pals all said that the parents had signed her death warrant by releasing the detail about her eye, when in fact getting that organised is one of the few things that Amaral actually appears to have organised (relatively) quickly.

Cite  for others things not done quickly enough please?

The PJ were run round in circles by the Tapas and McCanns. They should have phoned the police much sooner!

and how about not leaving the chilren alone in the first place... no evidence of stranger abduction from whooshing curtained windows and jemmied shutters NONE!
'Never underestimate the power of stupid people'... George Carlin

Offline mercury

Re: So what is the evidence for abduction?
« Reply #622 on: July 09, 2015, 10:29:18 PM »
So she was passed to someone else.
Total speculation to suit a theory Im afraid Eleanor.

Offline mercury

Re: So what is the evidence for abduction?
« Reply #623 on: July 09, 2015, 10:31:25 PM »
She could have been passed to someone standing in front of 5A but on the opposite side of the wall.  That would considerably shorten the distance to the car park exit for that person to have to cover.

However if the man JT saw was an innocent tourist - then it's irrelevant anyway.
More  total speculation which doesnt really help.

Offline Alice Purjorick

Re: So what is the evidence for abduction?
« Reply #624 on: July 09, 2015, 10:36:06 PM »
More  total speculation which doesnt really help.

It was all so easy until that nice Mr Redwood fragged "Tannerman The Abductor"  8(0(*
"Navigating the difference between weird but normal grief and truly suspicious behaviour is the key for any detective worth his salt.". ….Sarah Bailey

Offline mercury

Re: So what is the evidence for abduction?
« Reply #625 on: July 09, 2015, 10:39:22 PM »
Not that it really matters ... but I believe it was Madeleine herself who wasn't keen on being called Maddie.


I think you can be certain the PJ and SY are already following the evidence, of which they have the full picture. 
Both have stated publicly they are looking for an abductor.
Both have stated publicly that her parents are not the focus of their investigation.


Within context, so not exactly as you put it. The PJ or AG (cannot remember which one) stated the Mccanns were not suspects in their reopening of the case with regards the reason they reopened the case, ie  new evidence which potentially implicated that petty thief and pre drug addict who used to work in PDL

SY stated in a conference ,in the context of their latest list of persons of interest, that the mccanns were not suspects or persons of interest

At no stage have either force said that is the ONLY focus of their enquiry, indeed, af least SY have stated in writing, ALL avenues of investigation are open

Best to be as precise as possible and not put words into others mouths unless you can cite them, and if yu do go looking, make sure yiu find a cite where one or either forces say the Mccanns have been cleared. Just to be sure as the Irish say

Offline Miss Taken Identity

Re: So what is the evidence for abduction?
« Reply #626 on: July 09, 2015, 10:40:00 PM »
It was all so easy until that nice Mr Redwood fragged "Tannerman The Abductor"  8(0(*

Indeed it was all coming together nicely...uk publick brainwashed- parents heros of our day, new lifes sorted...damn the man!!!
'Never underestimate the power of stupid people'... George Carlin

Offline mercury

Re: So what is the evidence for abduction?
« Reply #627 on: July 09, 2015, 10:41:40 PM »
you have no respect for the mccanns or maddie and should not pretend you do
Who are you or anyone to expect or demand it? As if Moses wrote it down in stone as some commandment? Thou shall not doubt the Mccanns otherwise God will get very angry with you!!

 @)(++(*

Offline mercury

Re: So what is the evidence for abduction?
« Reply #628 on: July 09, 2015, 10:43:29 PM »
Winwood ,Clapton, Baker & Grech maybe?

This is exactly it it seems at least, as if all grey cells have been suspended from working, for some reason and somehow. extremely bizarre.

ferryman

  • Guest
Re: So what is the evidence for abduction?
« Reply #629 on: July 09, 2015, 10:46:05 PM »
Who are you or anyone to expect or demand it? As if Moses wrote it down in stone as some commandment? Thou shall not doubt the Mccanns otherwise God will get very angry with you!!

 @)(++(*

Respect for the rule of law is not (and will never be) an unreasonable request ...