Author Topic: Jeremy Bamber - Debunking Mike Tesko's strange theories  (Read 236719 times)

0 Members and 23 Guests are viewing this topic.

Offline John

Re: Jeremy Bamber - Debunking Mike Tesko's strange theories
« Reply #315 on: July 28, 2012, 07:15:17 PM »
Mike really won't let the "police killed Sheila" idea drop. However, even Jeremy stands by the theory that Sheila murdered everybody and then committed suicide, so how does Mike's mad idea help Jeremy?

Anyway, none of the blue forum seem to have pointed out that on the night of the murders all of the people who died were people who would bequeath money to Bamber or were due to inherit money following the Bambers' deaths. What an odd coincidence that all the people who stood in the way of Jeremy's inheritance died? What are the odds?

Exactly goatboy.   Sheila and the boys were only there for a few days so the chances of a third party choosing that particular day must be less than that of winning the Lottery.  One must remember too that there was no sign of a forced entry so whoever did it knew how to get in and out of the farmhouse and also knew how to get to and fro from the farm unseen.

Now who could that have been?  8-)(--)
A malicious prosecution for a crime which never existed. An exposé of egregious malfeasance by public officials.
Indeed, the truth never changes with the passage of time.

tescoman

  • Guest
Re: Jeremy Bamber - Debunking Mike Tesko's strange theories
« Reply #316 on: July 28, 2012, 09:30:11 PM »
I must say guys, I don't usually look at the blue forum any more but I did have a read earlier and it strikes me that they are totally bonkers.  Apparently I am to blame for all their troubles of late which I find hilarious. Get a grip blue forum as you are becoming quite the laughing stock.     @)(++(*

On a more serious note, Teskowski is still promoting the rubbish about how Sheila was killed. He insists that she was shot once downstairs and then again upstairs with a different rifle. This goes totally against all the evidence so no surprise there then.  Mike Teskowski doesn't do evidence or logic, everything is a conspiracy and sinister to him.  A bit like his arrest and conviction for his thieving and burglary activities, you know, the activities which weren't any of his doing yet he was nabbed red handed.

Back to Sheila.  We know where the rifle which killed Sheila was found. We know where the two empty shell casings belonging to the two bullets which killed her were found.  We know how many shell casings were found elsewhere in the house and the fact that each and every one of them can be back traced to injuries sustained by the other victims.  We also have the two bullets which killed Sheila, one of which fragmented according to the X-rays but a large enough piece was still recovered and examined.

The conclusion from all of this can only point to one scenario and that is that Sheila was shot and killed where she stood in the master bedroom.  The same rifle was used to fire both shots and at least one of those shots was made with a silencer fitted to the rifle.

Mike Teskowski's deluded theories and wild interpretations of the evidence will never amount to anything which can in any way point to suicide.



Hello one and all   8((()*/           Haven't been about lately but I see not much has changed and good old Mike is pushing the same nonsense even though the facts dont bear any of it out.   >@@(*&)

I do feel sorry for Jeremy with such a waste of space speaking for him.  Aw well suppose birds of a feather and all that garbo.  cheers   @)(++(*

tescoman

  • Guest
Re: Jeremy Bamber - Debunking Mike Tesko's strange theories
« Reply #317 on: July 28, 2012, 10:08:32 PM »
Its the only forum I've posted on, not in my own name.
KC's amoungst his own on there I think-deluded souls who need to be amoung others  8(8-))
At least it's civil on here and proper debate takes place.

Mike Tesko has taken his eye of the ball in order to play silly b....rs and in doing so has allowed the monkeys to take over the zoo.   @)(++(*
Or in other words that is all that is left in the zoo    @)(++(* 


They do say you feed monkeys peanuts but I think the blue forum doesn't even get them from Jerry Bamber any more   @)(++(*

Offline devils advocate

Re: Jeremy Bamber - Debunking Mike Tesko's strange theories
« Reply #318 on: July 28, 2012, 10:12:54 PM »
Its the only forum I've posted on, not in my own name.
KC's amoungst his own on there I think-deluded souls who need to be amoung others  8(8-))
At least it's civil on here and proper debate takes place.

Mike Tesko has taken his eye of the ball in order to play silly b....rs and in doing so has allowed the monkeys to take over the zoo.   @)(++(*
Or in other words that is all that is left in the zoo    @)(++(* 


They do say you feed monkeys peanuts but I think the blue forum doesn't even get them from Jerry Bamber any more   @)(++(*

Doesn't justice work in some wonderful ways.  Jeremy Bamber has dumped his friends and stephanie Hall has done the same???   8-)(--)

There must be some deep seated psychological reason for this occurrence because it happens time and time again.  Has anybody got any ideas on this subject?   >@@(*&)

Offline Centaur

Re: Jeremy Bamber - Debunking Mike Tesko's strange theories
« Reply #319 on: July 28, 2012, 10:37:33 PM »
Evenin all    8(0(*


Somebody's getting it tight on the blue forum tonight    8)-)))

Offline devils advocate

Re: Jeremy Bamber - Debunking Mike Tesko's strange theories
« Reply #320 on: July 28, 2012, 10:45:02 PM »
Evenin all    8(0(*


Somebody's getting it tight on the blue forum tonight    8)-)))

Hi Centaur we haven't had the pleasure of your company for a while.  What you been up to?

Offline puglove

Re: Jeremy Bamber - Debunking Mike Tesko's strange theories
« Reply #321 on: July 28, 2012, 11:16:36 PM »
Hey Mike, you little short-arsed tw... How did Sheila run about with no expirated blood and no swallowed blood? Give it your best shot, Jimmy Clitheroe.
Jeremy Bamber kicked Mike Tesko in the fanny.

Offline Centaur

Re: Jeremy Bamber - Debunking Mike Tesko's strange theories
« Reply #322 on: July 28, 2012, 11:40:27 PM »
Hey Mike, you little short-ar..d tw... How did Sheila run about with no expirated blood and no swallowed blood? Give it your best shot, Jimmy Clitheroe.
Evenng Shona.   He does come out with some rubbish doesn't he?   @)(++(*

sammy

  • Guest
Re: Jeremy Bamber - Debunking Mike Tesko's strange theories
« Reply #323 on: July 28, 2012, 11:43:01 PM »
hey guys.   i didn't manage to get back but i was banned from the other place the next day.  i wasn't even on there at the time.   

i was getting hassled anyway so it was only a matter of time.  they do have some cranky theories over there though.   >@@(*&)

Offline puglove

Re: Jeremy Bamber - Debunking Mike Tesko's strange theories
« Reply #324 on: July 28, 2012, 11:46:27 PM »
Hey Mike, you little short-ar..d tw... How did Sheila run about with no expirated blood and no swallowed blood? Give it your best shot, Jimmy Clitheroe.
Evenng Shona.   He does come out with some rubbish doesn't he?   @)(++(*

He surely does. What a tw...  Shame on you, Tesko. You are so full of crap.
Jeremy Bamber kicked Mike Tesko in the fanny.

sammy

  • Guest
Re: Jeremy Bamber - Debunking Mike Tesko's strange theories
« Reply #325 on: July 29, 2012, 12:07:48 AM »
Its the only forum I've posted on, not in my own name.
KC's amoungst his own on there I think-deluded souls who need to be amoung others  8(8-))
At least it's civil on here and proper debate takes place.

Mike Tesko has taken his eye of the ball in order to play silly b....rs and in doing so has allowed the monkeys to take over the zoo.   @)(++(*
Or in other words that is all that is left in the zoo    @)(++(* 


They do say you feed monkeys peanuts but I think the blue forum doesn't even get them from Jerry Bamber any more   @)(++(*
i was told that jeremy bamber doesnt even talk with him any more or discuss his case with him because he doesnt trust him.  is that true???

Offline Centaur

Re: Jeremy Bamber - Debunking Mike Tesko's strange theories
« Reply #326 on: July 29, 2012, 12:08:46 AM »
Hey Mike, you little short-ar..d tw... How did Sheila run about with no expirated blood and no swallowed blood? Give it your best shot, Jimmy Clitheroe.
Evenng Shona.   He does come out with some rubbish doesn't he?   @)(++(*

He surely does. What a tw...  Shame on you, Tesko. You are so full of crap.

What I don't understand is why he makes so much of it up and the rest...well he twists to suit.   8-)(--)

Offline puglove

Re: Jeremy Bamber - Debunking Mike Tesko's strange theories
« Reply #327 on: July 29, 2012, 08:16:34 AM »
Also, a massive big-up to "Yorkshire lass susan ingham" (ho ho ho!!) for putting the tin hat on any credibility left on the blue forum, after Gladys pretended to be Gav. Talk about one flew over the cuckoo's nest!!

Poor Rochy.   8(8-)) .
Jeremy Bamber kicked Mike Tesko in the fanny.

Offline starryian

Re: Jeremy Bamber - Debunking Mike Tesko's strange theories
« Reply #328 on: July 29, 2012, 12:48:26 PM »
I never cease to be amazed by Mike Tesko's ability to make something out of completely nothing.
Take for example his latest craze; that of the fragmented bullet; and I quote;

The circumstances of how Sheila came to be wounded by infliction of the first shot (Bullet PV/20), what happened to that bullet once it entered into her neck, and which was X-rayed with the fragments of bullet still insitu inside her throat, and its recovery during autopsy, and how it later came to be transformed into a whole bullet so that the prosecutions case could turn this into a one gun crime, needs to be looked into more deeply. Only when these events are scrutinised fully will it be possible to say with a degree of certainty that somebody substituted the original fragmented bullet (PV/20) and replaced it with a whole control bullet which was fired from rifle "Y", during unreported test firings of rifle and control ammunition, so as to present a false case to the jury that the same rifle (Y) had fired both bullets that wounded and killed Sheila Caffell, when in fact two different ones had been used...


The forensic pathlogist Peter Vanezis clearly has stated that the bullet was fragmented and has x-ray evidence. Forensic scientist Malcolm Fletcher has clearly made a mistake and labelled it a 'whole bullet' Looking at the plethora of forms that each pathologist has to fill in it is hardly a surprising mistake.
However, to Mike, this is a whole different world. It means a conspiracy, it means pathologists, the police, the relatives are lying. This inconsistency is positive proof to him of a huge conspiracy involving the Essex Police, the relatives, the CCRC and just about anyone else that dares to think that a greedy, narcissistic psychopath could possibly have committed murder.
Hmm......maybe we have got it all wrong. Maybe because this man has written a wrong word............all the evidence that supports Bamber's guilt is competely wrong. The relatives have committed gross purgery, the police and forensic sciences have constructed a conspiracy so complex that JFK conspiracy theorists would be put to shame. Everything prosecution witnesses have said are nothing more than complete lies...............Of course! we have all seen the light now Mike........... We must be all so darn stupid 8-)(--)

 >@@(*&)
« Last Edit: July 30, 2012, 12:42:14 AM by starryian »
Starryian..

Offline John

Re: Jeremy Bamber - Debunking Mike Tesko's strange theories
« Reply #329 on: July 29, 2012, 01:25:10 PM »
Also, a massive big-up to "Yorkshire lass susan ingham" (ho ho ho!!) for putting the tin hat on any credibility left on the blue forum, after Gladys pretended to be Gav. Talk about one flew over the cuckoo's nest!!

Poor Rochy.   8(8-)) .

Tesko's theories are becoming ever more erratic.  I also notice he is unable to debate issues on his discredited forum and resorts to name calling when it all goes wrong.  His latest crap about the first bullet which struck Sheila is typical of the nonsense he is posting. The pathologist was quite specific about the bullet even though parts of it fragmented.  The major remnant of this bullet was recovered from beside the fourth vertebra where it had caused fracturing. Tesko's continued babble to the effect that no bullet was recovered and that the fractured remnants were replaced by another test bullet is total garbage.

I will add that there isn't a shred of evidence which supports any of his deluded accusations about the police and in particular his claim that an officer fired the second shot at Sheila. Nor is there any evidence that Sheila was ever downstairs after the killings began.  Claiming that she could have walked upstairs after having been shot in the neck is just silly talk.  Just goes to show how desperate he is to post such spoofs!

There are saner people in the funny farm wearing straight-jackets!.


A malicious prosecution for a crime which never existed. An exposé of egregious malfeasance by public officials.
Indeed, the truth never changes with the passage of time.