Jeremy Bamber - Debunking Mike Tesko's strange theories

[sika]

The fact that no police officer involved in the "conspiracy" has ever come forward proving Jeremy was not guilty to claim the £1 million reward is proof enough to me that there cannot possibly have been any cover up. Remember, any police officer involved in the raid/investigation would probably be retired by now and surely have nothing to fear in terms of ending their career. The police pension may be generous but I doubt it is worth more than £1 million.

Quite agree.  If there was indeed a 'cover up', two questions.... Why? and how many people would have to be in on it? 

If Somebody did come along and help Bamber get out on a technicality, can you really see him handing over any money?
We all know what lengths he will go to for a few quid.

[sika]

If Tesko did possess 'that' photograph, he would know for sure that Jeremy couldn't have committed the murders.  So why, when armed with this vital piece of evidence does Tesko continue to post all these other wild theories?  Show everyone the photo and it's all over! 

The man is an absolute joke.  Why does anyone waste


 their time conversing with this prat?  His latest thread invites questions from members, to which he will reply yes or no.  Now, if that's not a desperate appeal for attention, I don't know what is!

This amused me as well. I would like to ask him "have you ever told a lie on this forum?".

Somebody did indeed ask that very question, his answer was............yes/no! 
What a prick.

[starryian]

Sika,
This ia all part of Tesko's ploy. He invite's people to put forward theories which he can then mull over later and use himself as reasons to argue Bamber's innocence. After years of appeals and attempted appeals the half-baked 'reasons why Bamber didn't do it' excuses have run completely dry. It is merely a simplistic ploy in order to garnish fresh ideas. Bamber and his supporters know the game is up and we are now playing the last vestiges of the endgame, which, true-to-form, Bamber is milking for all it's worth. Some of his supporters have gone so far down the road now they have lost their way back.

[Andrea]

Morning folks.

The other forum suggest there is a massive cover up, now for this "cover up" to be sustained for the time it has, how many people would that take?

[starryian]

Andrea,
there was no cover up, no secret agent bent on revenge, no third man, no conspiracy except in Tesko's own furtile imagination. Fart alight! they must be getting so desparate over there!
 

[sika]

Having read a transcript of Bamber's police interview, I noted that when asked how Shelia could have shot herself for a second time, he suggested it could have been the dog!!!!!!!!!

I wonder if Tesko has considered this line of defence!  As daft as it sounds, it's more plausible than most of his other theories!

[Andrea]

He suggested the dog!! Oh dear 

But as you say Sika, its more plausible then some of the theories we have seen.

Especially, the sheila barking like a dog to confuse the police.

[Andrea]

Andrea,
there was no cover up, no secret agent bent on revenge, no third man, no conspiracy except in Tesko's own furtile imagination. Fart alight! they must be getting so desparate over there!
 

I agree ian, no cover up. For a cover up to have taken place it would have had to start at the crime scene, Bamber wasnt officially in the frame for a month after the murders.

[Angelo222]

Andrea,
there was no cover up, no secret agent bent on revenge, no third man, no conspiracy except in Tesko's own furtile imagination. Fart alight! they must be getting so desparate over there!
 

I agree ian, no cover up. For a cover up to have taken place it would have had to start at the crime scene, Bamber wasnt officially in the frame for a month after the murders.

Exactly the point I have always made. There was nothing to cover up at the beginning as most police officers took Jeremy's word for it that it was Sheila who did it. Only Sgt Stan Jones had doubts initially, I have no doubt that if this officer had not followed his suspicions and been a big enough character to be able to challenge a superior officer like Insp Taff Jones then Bamber could have got away with it completely. Full marks Stan Jones!!

Andrea.  Myall's statement is on this forum but Bews has never been available because it is damming of Jeremy Bamber. You can always have a look at Bews video interview.

[Andrea]

I have read Myalls evidence from the trial, and have seen Bewes on the guardian videos.

The police did a shite job on this case, no doubt about that. But it doesnt take away the fact that JB was responsible imo.

[Milly]

Hi Andrea.  You are right in what you say the police did a crap job but they were led by a muppet who was only interested in golf.   Taff Jones wasnted to put the murders down to a domestic for some reason, could it have been to cover his own bad judgement???   8-)(--)   

[Flora]

JP is pally with KT they are all doomed           

[starryian]

He suggested the dog!! Oh dear 

But as you say Sika, its more plausible then some of the theories we have seen.

Especially, the sheila barking like a dog to confuse the police.

Leading on from that Andrea, according to Tesko's unusual brand of logic I am surprised that Bamber didn't shoot the dog on account that the dog may have gone straight to the police and 'grassed him up' This would probably be used as an excuse as to why Bamber could not have committed the murders by virtue of the dog still being left alive and could possibly testify against the perpetrator. Any self-respecting mass murderer would be sure to eliminate any possible witnesses. Ergo - it could not have been Jeremy Bamber

Alas, the poor dog's luck didn't last. Bamber had the creature (which I understand was given the name 'Crispy') put down a few weeks after the killings because 'he might chew the wires of my stereo system'
Bamber had eliminated the only living thing to emerge from White House Farm on the morning of August 7th 1985.

[Andrea]

Were there two dogs, Ian? Was there a Labrador too?

Yes every living thing from WHF all gone.

Had a good day ian? I have until my dog chewed my trainers!!

[starryian]

Were there two dogs, Ian? Was there a Labrador too?

Yes every living thing from WHF all gone.

Had a good day ian? I have until my dog chewed my trainers!!

Yes I think there were two dogs Andrea. I really dont know what happened to the labrador. Maybe it was adopted by one of the relatives or farm workers. In any event, let us hope it had a better fate than poor Crispy.
Yes Andrea, dogs and trainers a very bad combination. Have a good day Andrea.