Kevin Halligen. McCanns and the Conman. Ch5 documentary.

[Alfred R Jones]

Yes it is. Exton is reported to have had doubts about the McCanns and their abduction tale. Any sympathy shown towards them would bring that doubt into question.

Could you please supply a link to these doubts about the "abduction tale"?

[Wonderfulspam]

Could you please supply a link to these doubts about the "abduction tale"?

"The report questioned 'anomalies' in the McCanns' statements"

http://miscarriageofjustice.co/index.php?topic=2794.0

I can't imagine why.

[Mr Gray]

By implication you asked about contract law.
You are ducking and diving now davey boy.
So tell me where I was wrong about English contract law?.
I presume you understand the question?

you wrote...
OK show me exactly where I am wrong in the English contract law bit. Which after all was what you asked about in the first place.

So first you say I asked about contract law. When you were found to be wrong you change it to "by implication".
Never said anything you wrote about contract law was wrong...just irrelevant as you have not seen the contract...

the question is ..can the mcccanns be designated as criminals and as I have rightly stated the answer is no

[Alfred R Jones]

"The report questioned 'anomalies' in the McCanns' statements"

http://miscarriageofjustice.co/index.php?topic=2794.0

I can't imagine why.

Perhaps you could c & p the bit where Exton specifically expresses doubts about  "the abduction tale" for me?  I had a brief look at this Times article (which I believe was subsequently corrected and apologies issued to the McCanns) but couldn't find the expressed doubts about "the abduction tale" as mentioned by Faithlilly.

[Wonderfulspam]

Perhaps you could c & p the bit where Exton specifically expresses doubts about  "the abduction tale" for me?  I had a brief look at this Times article (which I believe was subsequently corrected and apologies issued to the McCanns) but couldn't find the expressed doubts about "the abduction tale" as mentioned by Faithlilly.

Perhaps you could c & p the bit where Exton specifically expresses doubts about  "the abduction tale" for me?

Why would I do that, I never claimed he did, and how could I do it when he didn't.

However I will say, the McCanns 'tale' is 'abduction' isn't it, as claimed in their 'witness statements'.

Oakley's Omega operation, of which Exton was one of the big boys, questioned anomilies in the McCanns 'witness statements'.


Faithlilly described this as being 'doubts about their abduction tale', I don't think she was wrong.

[Mr Gray]

Your original statement that kicked this off was to the effect that neither the fund nor the McCanns could be held accountable for Oakley's actions. I demonstrated that under English contract law they can be. Now stop embarrassing yourself.

You have shown nothing because we have not seen the contract.....you are assuming that the funds solicitors...who would draw up the contract would enter into an illegal contract...

[Alfred R Jones]

Perhaps you could c & p the bit where Exton specifically expresses doubts about  "the abduction tale" for me?

Why would I do that, I never claimed he did, and how could I do it when he didn't.

However I will say, the McCanns 'tale' is 'abduction' isn't it, as claimed in their 'witness statements'.

Oakley's Omega operation, of which Exton was one of the big boys, questioned anomilies in the McCanns 'witness statements'.


Faithlilly described this as being 'doubts about their abduction tale', I don't think she was wrong.

why attempt to answer my request then, if you were unable to supply the link?  I shall wait for Faithlilly as I'm sure she'll be able to....

[Wonderfulspam]

why attempt to answer my request then, if you were unable to supply the link?  I shall wait for Faithlilly as I'm sure she'll be able to....

No, she won't be able to, because there isn't a link to 'the bit where Exton specifically expresses doubts about  "the abduction tale", is there?   You know that, I know that. That's the end of that then isn't it.

I thought I'd reply to your post because I am very,very fond of you & I fancied a bit of a chat.

[Mr Gray]

No, she won't be able to, because there isn't a link to 'the bit where Exton specifically expresses doubts about  "the abduction tale", is there?   You know that, I know that. That's the end of that then isn't it.

I thought I'd reply to your post because I am very,very fond of you & I fancied a bit of a chat.

So it looks like exton is not on record anywhere questioning the abduction theory...glad we 've got that straight...


I thought I'd reply to your post because I am very,very fond of you & I fancied a bit of a chat.

[Wonderfulspam]

So it looks like exton is not on record anywhere questioning the abduction theory...glad we 've got that straight...


I thought I'd reply to your post because I am very,very fond of you & I fancied a bit of a chat.

Why would he, there's absoloutely nothing suspicious about it is there.

SY are gonna bust those burglars any day now.

[John]

To clarify, commissioning a private investigation into criminal activities in Portugal whilst an official investigation is live constitutes an act of obstruction punishable under the Portuguese penal code.

Antonio Martins, president of the National Association of Portuguese Judges, told the newspaper 24 Horas: "It is still up to the state to carry out criminal investigation. That kind of activity has no legal standing.

"Anything that results from private investigation has no substance."

Mr Martins said the private detectives and even the McCanns themselves could be accused of "obstruction of justice".

Carlos Anjos, the head of Portugal's criminal police federation, added: "This can only be another diversion tactic from the McCanns. It is nothing but folklore.

"Portugal does not have legislation in this area. Private detectives who intervene in criminal cases cannot exist.

"The law only tolerates private detectives who gather information and only about matters of the private lives of certain people like extramarital relationships."

A separate police source warned that the involvement of investigators may not only be illegal but could have a detrimental effect on the inquiry.

The high ranking official told newspaper Correio da Manha: "If private investigators come here they will be running a serious risk of being arrested."

www.telegraph.co.uk/news/uknews/1564121/Madeleine-McCann-police-fury-over-private-hunt.html

[Mr Gray]

To clarify, commissioning a private investigation into criminal activities in Portugal whilst an official investigation is live constitutes an act of obstruction punishable under the Portuguese penal code.

Antonio Martins, president of the National Association of Portuguese Judges, told the newspaper 24 Horas: "It is still up to the state to carry out criminal investigation. That kind of activity has no legal standing.

"Anything that results from private investigation has no substance."

Mr Martins said the private detectives and even the McCanns themselves could be accused of "obstruction of justice".

Carlos Anjos, the head of Portugal's criminal police federation, added: "This can only be another diversion tactic from the McCanns. It is nothing but folklore.

"Portugal does not have legislation in this area. Private detectives who intervene in criminal cases cannot exist.

"The law only tolerates private detectives who gather information and only about matters of the private lives of certain people like extramarital relationships."

A separate police source warned that the involvement of investigators may not only be illegal but could have a detrimental effect on the inquiry.

The high ranking official told newspaper Correio da Manha: "If private investigators come here they will be running a serious risk of being arrested."

www.telegraph.co.uk/news/uknews/1564121/Madeleine-McCann-police-fury-over-private-hunt.html

Where in this article does it state that what halligans company did was illegal...it doesnt

[John]

Where in this article does it state that what halligans company did was illegal...it doesnt

I suggest you read it again and this time remove the rose-tinted spectacles.

[misty]

Where in this article does it state that what halligans company did was illegal...it doesnt

The article does help re-iterate why the McCanns were unable to introduce the Smithman e-fit into the public domain as Oakley Int. had technically interfered with a witness.