Bamber tries to sell nude pictures of Sheila to The Sun newspaper

[Brancher]

For Gawd's sake, don't call him a sossij - he'll have your leg off.

You know, the interesting thing is that you once believed Jeremy Bamber to be innocent, before changing your stance.

I have NEVER believed him to be innocent.

Which one of us is the "sossij"?  It's not stupid to question evidence.  That's what this Forum is supposed to be for.

[Caroline]

Of course not.

So again, what makes you think he's guilty?

[kizzy]

You’re flattering yourself.

I’ve no more interest in analysing you than I have in dissecting a slug

well, I wouldn't know about that Iv never dissected a slug.

You do come across as angry though

[Vertigo Swirl]

I'm sure Colin was delighted.

I’m sure he would have been a lot less delighted had he learned that the Sun paid money for the photos and then published them.  In fact, they used the story to highlight JB’s lack of morals and greedy, grasping nature so what would Colin have had to feel aggrieved by, specifically?

[Vertigo Swirl]

I’m not the only person who sees Jeremy’s behaviour as suspicious.  Experienced police offices did too right from the start.  If you’re saying character traits and behaviour has no bearing on whether or not a person has a propensity to commit a crime, then that is your opinion.  Personally I think it’s relevant.

yet on another case, you think it irrelevant VS - wich is it normal or not normal.

Perhaps you could provide a cite for this allegation?  I shan’t hold my breath.

[Vertigo Swirl]

Of course not.

For the third time of asking, what then?

[Vertigo Swirl]

I know you did, You have once again avoided answering my questions.  Why?  Here they are again

1) what does the video prove in your opinion?
2) Is the journo telling bare faced lies, in your opinion?

Bumping for Holly again, in the vain hope of an answer...

[The General]

I’m sure he would have been a lot less delighted had he learned that the Sun paid money for the photos and then published them.  In fact, they used the story to highlight JB’s lack of morals and greedy, grasping nature so what would Colin have had to feel aggrieved by, specifically?

What a crock! If they could've settled on a price they'd have published them in a heartbeat. Because they're ****s.

[Caroline]

What a crock! If they could've settled on a price they'd have published them in a heartbeat. Because they're ****s.

No they wouldn't, they couldn't because they were pornographic in nature so the better story was Bamber trying to sell them.

[The General]

No they wouldn't, they couldn't because they were pornographic in nature so the better story was Bamber trying to sell them.

They'd publish a few teasers, of that I am sure. Literally anything to hawk their shitty rag.

[Caroline]

They'd publish a few teasers, of that I am sure. Literally anything to hawk their shitty rag.

Ordinarily yes, I agree BUT the better story was him selling them and that came free.

[The General]

Ordinarily yes, I agree BUT the better story was him selling them and that came free.

Ought's better than nought, true enough.

[Vertigo Swirl]

What a crock! If they could've settled on a price they'd have published them in a heartbeat. Because they're ****s.

How rude. 

[The General]

How rude.

I know, but that's the depths they will plumb.

[Vertigo Swirl]

They'd publish a few teasers, of that I am sure. Literally anything to hawk their shitty rag.

Do you have some evidence of the haggling that went on?  How much was Jeremy demanding for them?  Surely a man as money grabbing as Jeremy would have gone to the Sun knowing they of all the tabs was likely to pay out the most so why do you think he turned down their offer?  Who do you think he was hoping would pay more and is there evidence of him approaching other papers?