Bamber tries to sell nude pictures of Sheila to The Sun newspaper

[Caroline]

Ought's better than nought, true enough.

They also got to take the moral high ground - for a change.

[Vertigo Swirl]

I know, but that's the depths they will plumb.

No, haha very funny, but I was referring to your rude dismissal of my post, Mr Crock Pot.

[The General]

Do you have some evidence of the haggling that went on?  How much was Jeremy demanding for them?  Surely a man as money grabbing as Jeremy would have gone to the Sun knowing they of all the tabs was likely to pay out the most so why do you think he turned down their offer?  Who do you think he was hoping would pay more and is there evidence of him approaching other papers?

Wow, questions.
OK.
1. No, hence the reference to my opinion 'I am sure'.
2. According to the crap TV series £20k (Steve Graham was good though with his Welsh accent, boyo)
3. I think Brett the knobhead did the contact bit with a friend of a friend.
4. No idea. But the two idiots probably thought it would be a piece of p1ss extracting money off a renowned moral vacuum of a rag.
5. Sirhan Sirhan was a CIA plant as part of a wider 'mind-control' experiment.

[ISpyWithMyEye]

Ordinarily yes, I agree BUT the better story was him selling them and that came free.

Bet he was FUMING 

Funny he didn’t sue them...😌

[Vertigo Swirl]

Wow, questions.
OK.
1. No, hence the reference to my opinion 'I am sure'.
2. According to the crap TV series £20k (Steve Graham was good though with his Welsh accent, boyo)
3. I think Brett the knobhead did the contact bit with a friend of a friend.
4. No idea. But the two idiots probably thought it would be a piece of p1ss extracting money off a renowned moral vacuum of a rag.
5. Sirhan Sirhan was a CIA plant as part of a wider 'mind-control' experiment.

I thought Steve Graham’s performance was the weakest link in the series, especially the accent.  That is all.

[mrswah]

I thought Steve Graham’s performance was the weakest link in the series, especially the accent.  That is all.

Most of the reviews I read "slammed" Steve Graham's Welsh accent.


Personally, I thought it was ok----but then, I'm no expert on Welsh accents.

[Holly Goodhead]

Bumping for Holly again, in the vain hope of an answer...

Your questions:

1) what does the video prove in your opinion?
2) Is the journo telling bare faced lies, in your opinion?

1). A meeting took place between Sun hack, JB and BC to discuss some media coverage. No images were presented. 

2). Sun hack claims the images under discussion involved a cucumber and vibrator.  Surely JB would know such images, if existed and made available, would be off limit for a family rag?   

Maybe it was a wind up and JB was intending to offer up SC's professional modelling portfolio? 

SC had some explicit images taken which she regretted.  Why then retain such images?  Surely she would dispose of ASAP? 

All these things portray JB in a poor light but imo he was an immature guy, 24 yoa, out of his depth with it all.

[G-Unit]

Your questions:

1) what does the video prove in your opinion?
2) Is the journo telling bare faced lies, in your opinion?

1). A meeting took place between Sun hack, JB and BC to discuss some media coverage. No images were presented. 

2). Sun hack claims the images under discussion involved a cucumber and vibrator.  Surely JB would know such images, if existed and made available, would be off limit for a family rag?   

Maybe it was a wind up and JB was intending to offer up SC's professional modelling portfolio? 

SC had some explicit images taken which she regretted.  Why then retain such images?  Surely she would dispose of ASAP? 

All these things portray JB in a poor light but imo he was an immature guy, 24 yoa, out of his depth with it all.

Wasn't Jeremy supposed to be under surveillance in London on the day he was lunching with the journalist?  Or did it end at 1.30am? Wasn't that the same day he went to WHF for his car docs too?

[Vertigo Swirl]

Your questions:

1) what does the video prove in your opinion?
2) Is the journo telling bare faced lies, in your opinion?

1). A meeting took place between Sun hack, JB and BC to discuss some media coverage. No images were presented. 

2). Sun hack claims the images under discussion involved a cucumber and vibrator.  Surely JB would know such images, if existed and made available, would be off limit for a family rag?   

Maybe it was a wind up and JB was intending to offer up SC's professional modelling portfolio? 

SC had some explicit images taken which she regretted.  Why then retain such images?  Surely she would dispose of ASAP? 

All these things portray JB in a poor light but imo he was an immature guy, 24 yoa, out of his depth with it all.

Thank you.  So unlike your investigative partner G-Unit you do at least accept that the meeting occurred and that the journo did not fabricate the story.

[ISpyWithMyEye]

Your questions:

1) what does the video prove in your opinion?
2) Is the journo telling bare faced lies, in your opinion?

1). A meeting took place between Sun hack, JB and BC to discuss some media coverage. No images were presented. 

2). Sun hack claims the images under discussion involved a cucumber and vibrator.  Surely JB would know such images, if existed and made available, would be off limit for a family rag?   

Maybe it was a wind up and JB was intending to offer up SC's professional modelling portfolio? 

SC had some explicit images taken which she regretted.  Why then retain such images?  Surely she would dispose of ASAP? 

All these things portray JB in a poor light but imo he was an immature guy, 24 yoa, out of his depth with it all.

“Maybe it was a wind up and JB was intending to offer up SC's professional modelling portfolio”



So are you saying Jeremy was trying to deceive the journalist and get £20K off The Sun under false pretences?

Besides being dishonest and lying, would he really be inclined to do a wind up when he was grief stricken?

[kizzy]

Perhaps you could provide a cite for this allegation?  I shan’t hold my breath.

Good job you weren't holding your breath but just wondered why your opinion changed with JB.

On whats relevant and irrelevant.


SNIP VS
I’m not the only person who sees Jeremy’s behaviour as suspicious.  Experienced police offices did too right from the start.  If you’re saying character traits and behaviour has no bearing on whether or not a person has a propensity to commit a crime, then that is your opinion. Personally I think it’s relevant.

[Vertigo Swirl]

Good job you weren't holding your breath but just wondered why your opinion changed with JB.

On whats relevant and irrelevant.


SNIP VS
I’m not the only person who sees Jeremy’s behaviour as suspicious.  Experienced police offices did too right from the start.  If you’re saying character traits and behaviour has no bearing on whether or not a person has a propensity to commit a crime, then that is your opinion. Personally I think it’s relevant.

Are you trying to argue that character traits and inappropriate behaviour are or are not relevant in criminal cases?  I argued that they are, do you disagree?  If so why?  You’ve listed a bunch of behaviours you view as suspicious in the McCann case so presumably you agree with my argument, but who knows.

[Brietta]

Please stay On Topic.   Thank you

[ISpyWithMyEye]

Good job you weren't holding your breath but just wondered why your opinion changed with JB.

On whats relevant and irrelevant.


SNIP VS
I’m not the only person who sees Jeremy’s behaviour as suspicious.  Experienced police offices did too right from the start.  If you’re saying character traits and behaviour has no bearing on whether or not a person has a propensity to commit a crime, then that is your opinion. Personally I think it’s relevant.

It’s a good job Jeremy Bamber hasn’t been holding his breath for his umpteenth appeal...

[kizzy]

Are you trying to argue that character traits and inappropriate behaviour are or are not relevant in criminal cases?  I argued that they are, do you disagree?  If so why?  You’ve listed a bunch of behaviours you view as suspicious in the McCann case so presumably you agree with my argument, but who knows.

It was VS I do believe them relevant - but it's you that doesn't in the M case but do in JB case

Anyway it was off topic - probably best discussed on the appropriate forum another time


It was a bit incompetent really for B to not delete the full post. as its a bit garbled as it stands.