So what's next in the libel trial saga?

[Mr Gray]

A judge cannot make a statement of fact during evidence gathering thus her comment highlighted above should have read...
MC- Knowing they are innocent didn't suppress this feeling?

So is the translation incorrect or did the judge say what has been recorded

[Alfred R Jones]

So is the translation incorrect or did the judge say what has been recorded

Apparently it is an incorrect translation.  Makes you wonder about the rest of it, dunnit? &%+((£

[jassi]

Don't worry, I'm sure the judge knew exactly what was said. 

[Mr Gray]

Apparently it is an incorrect translation.  Makes you wonder about the rest of it, dunnit? &%+((£

I'm more than happy to consider an incorrect translation...I'm sure the reports and police files are full of them....particularly the ones that have been translated twice.

[Alfred R Jones]

Don't worry, I'm sure the judge knew exactly what was said. 

I'm not remotely worried, however you must admit it does make discussion about what was said in court a complete farce if the translation turns out to be incorrect here and there (and wherever it suits).

[Wonderfulspam]

I'm more than happy to consider an incorrect translation...I'm sure the reports and police files are full of them....particularly the ones that have been translated twice.

Course, the McCanns translations, which Kate spent several months concocting her account of the truth from, them ones are spot on.

[Lyall]

I'm not remotely worried, however you must admit it does make discussion about what was said in court a complete farce if the translation turns out to be incorrect here and there (and wherever it suits).

If you think the reports from the court are considerably inaccurate (apart from entirely understandable occasional problems with syntax like in the sentence highlighted) consider why the English press hasn't reported more of what was said itself.

[Alfred R Jones]

If you think the reports from the court are considerably inaccurate (apart from entirely understandable occasional problems with syntax like in the sentence highlighted) consider why the English press hasn't reported more of what was said itself.

Have the English press reported considerably less than the PT press on this court case?

[Lyall]

Have the English press reported considerably less than the PT press on this court case?

 &%+((£ I don't know how much the Portuguese have covered it.

But they're not as obsessed with the case as the London papers are in any case. It's mainly just one Portuguese paper who report on it now isn't it?

[Alfred R Jones]

&%+((£ I don't know how much the Portuguese have covered it.

But they're not as obsessed with the case as the London papers are in any case. It's mainly just one Portuguese paper who report on it now isn't it?

What, the libel case?  I think more than one PT paper writes the odd line about it now and again.

[Mr Gray]

&%+((£ I don't know how much the Portuguese have covered it.

But they're not as obsessed with the case as the London papers are in any case. It's mainly just one Portuguese paper who report on it now isn't it?

just wait for the verdict....

[Lyall]

just wait for the verdict....

Assuming we ever get one &%+((£

[Lyall]

What, the libel case?  I think more than one PT paper writes the odd line about it now and again.

You're dodging my point: why haven't the London papers reported more from that courtroom?

[Eleanor]

You're dodging my point: why haven't the London papers reported more from that courtroom?

Erm....... Oh, I know.  They are waiting for The Verdict.

[DCI]

Erm....... Oh, I know.  They are waiting for The Verdict.

Nah Eleanor, there was no pretendy Portuguese translator/journalists that hadn't been sussed.