Author Topic: Welcome Caroline!  (Read 4423 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Andrea

Welcome Caroline!
« on: September 29, 2014, 11:12:34 AM »
If that's you from blue, Caroline, welcome  ?{)(** 8((()*/

Offline Caroline

Re: Welcome Caroline!
« Reply #1 on: September 29, 2014, 11:14:18 AM »
If that's you from blue, Caroline, welcome  ?{)(** 8((()*/

Yeah, it's me  8)--)) and thank you!  *&(+(+

Offline Andrea

Re: Welcome Caroline!
« Reply #2 on: September 29, 2014, 11:20:27 AM »
Nice to see you here.

Offline John

Re: Welcome Caroline!
« Reply #3 on: September 29, 2014, 11:25:16 AM »
No I don't like games either H, I think Jeremy is guilty  %£&)**#  nothing to do with psychology experiments,   &%&£(+  @)(++(*

Great to have you on board Caroline  8@??)(  8@??)(  8@??)( 

I can just see the reaction on blue.  On a serious note however Caroline, is there any particular reason you changed your views on Jeremy?
« Last Edit: September 29, 2014, 11:30:10 AM by John »
A malicious prosecution for a crime which never existed. An exposé of egregious malfeasance by public officials.
Indeed, the truth never changes with the passage of time.

Offline Caroline

Re: Welcome Caroline!
« Reply #4 on: September 29, 2014, 11:29:12 AM »
Great to have you on board Caroline  8@??)(  8@??)(  8@??)( 

I can just see the reaction on blue.

Thanks  8((()*/

Offline Caroline

Re: Welcome Caroline!
« Reply #5 on: September 29, 2014, 11:44:19 AM »
Great to have you on board Caroline  8@??)(  8@??)(  8@??)( 

I can just see the reaction on blue.  On a serious note however Caroline, is there any particular reason you changed your views on Jeremy?

Lots of reasons John and although I didn't admit it, there have always been a few things that bugged me. The phone call was always worrying. The whole thing just seems staged - the receiver off the hook for instance, it just looks as though it was done to show Neville used the phone.

When I asked him about the wallet, he didn't reply (he always replied within days) and he had to be prompted. The reply was really odd in that he said he knew I had asked a specific question, and that the answer was 'no' or 'I didn't' but he didn't remember the question. Holly just pointed out my degree and maybe that makes me analyse things too deeply but knowing that the question was 'specific' and knowing the 'answer' should have prompted his memory to retrieve the question. Also the answer he gave was non-committal and he seems to do that a lot, so that if caught out, he can change his answer fairly quickly.

The final clincher is the claim about Neville's phone call - he was willing to change the time of his call to police in order to make it fit (although again, he was non-committal in respect to his initial timings - like I said, he does that a lot!)

Offline John

Re: Welcome Caroline!
« Reply #6 on: September 29, 2014, 11:50:22 AM »
Lots of reasons John and although I didn't admit it, there have always been a few things that bugged me. The phone call was always worrying. The whole thing just seems staged - the receiver off the hook for instance, it just looks as though it was done to show Neville used the phone.

When I asked him about the wallet, he didn't reply (he always replied within days) and he had to be prompted. The reply was really odd in that he said he knew I had asked a specific question, and that the answer was 'no' or 'I didn't' but he didn't remember the question. Holly just pointed out my degree and maybe that makes me analyse things too deeply but knowing that the question was 'specific' and knowing the 'answer' should have prompted his memory to retrieve the question. Also the answer he gave was non-committal and he seems to do that a lot, so that if caught out, he can change his answer fairly quickly.

The final clincher is the claim about Neville's phone call - he was willing to change the time of his call to police in order to make it fit (although again, he was non-committal in respect to his initial timings - like I said, he does that a lot!)

Absolutely agree with you, I found his evidence about the phone calls just too woolly.  If Nevill had indeed phoned him in despair he would have taken off like a blue arsed fly...point is he didn't and couldn't have delayed longer if he had tried. The stopping to put on jumpers was a clue in itself, a five minute trip and he stopped half way???

Stan Jones saw the conspiracy from the moment he entered Jeremy's cottage in Goldhanger, from then on it was only a matter of watch and wait imo.
« Last Edit: September 29, 2014, 11:52:45 AM by John »
A malicious prosecution for a crime which never existed. An exposé of egregious malfeasance by public officials.
Indeed, the truth never changes with the passage of time.

Offline Caroline

Re: Welcome Caroline!
« Reply #7 on: September 29, 2014, 11:54:32 AM »
Absolutely agree with you, I found his evidence about the phone calls just too woolly.  If Nevill had indeed phoned him in despair he would have taken off like a blue arsed fly...point is he didn't and couldn't have delayed longer if he had tried. The stopping to put on jumpers was a clue in itself, a five minute trip and he stopped half way???

I think he needed the police to see him arrive or they may have thought he'd been there all along! He tried to avoid being a suspect and tried to cover all avenues but in doing so, it just made him more suspicious!

Offline Holly Goodhead

Re: Welcome Caroline!
« Reply #8 on: September 29, 2014, 12:48:51 PM »
No I don't like games either H, I think Jeremy is guilty  %£&)**#  nothing to do with psychology experiments,   &%&£(+  @)(++(*

When you joined Blue you said you initially thought JB guilty.  Then you spent some time researching the case and you found JB innocent.  So much so that you spent some 2 years on Blue arguing your points quite forcibly I might add.  Now another U turn and you're back to guilty.  Do you think a time might come when you will switch back to innocent?

http://jeremybamberforum.co.uk/index.php/topic,2931.msg103751.html#msg103751

http://jeremybamberforum.co.uk/index.php/topic,2931.msg103772.html#msg103772

I have no intention whatsoever of exchanging posts with you and in any event I think I might struggle against your superior intellectual and analytical skills.  And of course your succinct way with words v my "rambling" posts.

« Last Edit: September 30, 2014, 04:28:43 PM by Mr Moderator »
Just my opinion of course but Jeremy Bamber is innocent and a couple from UK, unknown to T9, abducted Madeleine McCann - motive unknown.  Was J J murdered as a result of identifying as a goth?

Offline Holly Goodhead

Re: Welcome Caroline!
« Reply #9 on: September 29, 2014, 12:53:45 PM »
Lots of reasons John and although I didn't admit it, there have always been a few things that bugged me. The phone call was always worrying. The whole thing just seems staged - the receiver off the hook for instance, it just looks as though it was done to show Neville used the phone.

When I asked him about the wallet, he didn't reply (he always replied within days) and he had to be prompted. The reply was really odd in that he said he knew I had asked a specific question, and that the answer was 'no' or 'I didn't' but he didn't remember the question. Holly just pointed out my degree and maybe that makes me analyse things too deeply but knowing that the question was 'specific' and knowing the 'answer' should have prompted his memory to retrieve the question. Also the answer he gave was non-committal and he seems to do that a lot, so that if caught out, he can change his answer fairly quickly.

The final clincher is the claim about Neville's phone call - he was willing to change the time of his call to police in order to make it fit (although again, he was non-committal in respect to his initial timings - like I said, he does that a lot!)

 %£&)**#
Just my opinion of course but Jeremy Bamber is innocent and a couple from UK, unknown to T9, abducted Madeleine McCann - motive unknown.  Was J J murdered as a result of identifying as a goth?

Offline Myster

Re: Welcome Caroline!
« Reply #10 on: September 29, 2014, 01:05:21 PM »
Step back gents  8()-000( ... I can hear the sound of claws being sharpened!  8(8-))
It's one of them cases, in'it... one of them f*ckin' cases.

Offline puglove

Re: Welcome Caroline!
« Reply #11 on: September 29, 2014, 01:08:01 PM »
*huff*      *puff*

Just moving the furniture around to make room for Gladys' commode and Clappy's zimmer.


 8(8-))
Jeremy Bamber kicked Mike Tesko in the fanny.

Offline Caroline

Re: Welcome Caroline!
« Reply #12 on: September 29, 2014, 01:26:53 PM »
When you joined Blue you said you initially thought JB guilty.  Then you spent some time researching the case and you found JB innocent.  So much so that you spent some 2 years on Blue arguing your points quite forcibly I might add.  Now another U turn and you're back to guilty.  Do you think a time might come when you will switch back to innocent?

http://jeremybamberforum.co.uk/index.php/topic,2931.msg103751.html#msg103751

http://jeremybamberforum.co.uk/index.php/topic,2931.msg103772.html#msg103772

I have no intention whatsoever of exchanging posts with you and in any event I think I might struggle against your superior intellectual and analytical skills.  And of course your succinct way with words v my "rambling" posts.

Quite!  @)(++(*
« Last Edit: September 30, 2014, 04:29:08 PM by Mr Moderator »

Offline Caroline

Re: Welcome Caroline!
« Reply #13 on: September 29, 2014, 01:28:47 PM »
Step back gents  8()-000( ... I can hear the sound of claws being sharpened!  8(8-))

No need to step back, I'm not interested in shooting the breeze with M's Goodhead.  &%&£(+

Offline John

Re: Welcome Caroline!
« Reply #14 on: September 29, 2014, 01:29:48 PM »
Step back gents  8()-000( ... I can hear the sound of claws being sharpened!  8(8-))

I too thought Jeremy innocent at one time, for me the thought that any young man so well heeled as he was could do such a dastardly deed was unthinkable but then as I started to peruse the evidence I came to my senses, the rest is as they say, history.

Holly has always been welcome here even though she holds an opposing view to most of us, she is to be commended for her fortitude and persistence if nothing else. So please girls, lets debate the issues and not dwell on the past.
A malicious prosecution for a crime which never existed. An exposé of egregious malfeasance by public officials.
Indeed, the truth never changes with the passage of time.