Oh ... hi Caroline and welcome! I am not the most observant as you can probably tell! Glad to see you have realised Bamber is truly a wrong 'un' .... I have seen many people move from innocent to guilty but never seen anyone read the whole case and move the other way!
Holly is coming next!
It's really a very simple case imho and although there is a mountain of circumstantial evidence , the simple fact is Sheila could not (and would not) of committed the murders ergo Bamber is guilty beyond any reasonable doubt! Even without the sound moderator evidence, just her clean feet, lack of blood evidence and lack of gun shot residue on her hands and clothes is way more than enough proof in my book! Let alone the preposterous notion she beat her dad so badly and didn't sustain one bruise or chip a manicured fingernail! Then you add Julie and the rest of the evidence and it's blindingly obvious Bamber is guilty.
And again imho Bamber will never confess. Even Nugnug an idiot knows there can be no redemption for executing children to gain there inheritance! Bamber knows full well that his crime is indeed 'evil almost beyond belief!
