Investigation into McCann internet trolls launched by police

[stephen25000]

I see that more of the mccann supporter trolls tweets to Brenda Leyland have become available on a link on the current amazon discussion.

[Alice Purjorick]

I'm not sure about that Sadie.

Bundleman used to be the nickname for Tannerman, and SY reckon Tannerman is Crecheman.
It may turn out that Tannerman isn't Crecheman after all, but Redwood wanted people to concentrate on Smithman
and / or any recollection of someone carrying a child at around 10 pm.

Officers from Scotland Yard have ruled out a key sighting on the day Madeleine vanished and are trying to identify a number of mysterious men seen lurking around the apartment where it is believed she was abducted.

A man seen carrying a child by the McCanns' friend Jane Tanner is now thought to have been an innocent British holiday maker, and the investigation is now focusing on another man with dark hair who was also seen with a little girl in his arms around 45 minutes later.

(...)

Speaking after a new appeal aired on BBC Crimewatch, Detective Chief Inspector Andy Redwood said: "Our focus in terms of understanding what happened on the night of May 3 has now given us a shift of emphasis. We are almost certain that the man seen by Jane Tanner is not Madeleine's abductor.

"It takes us through to a position at 10pm when we see another man who is walking towards the ocean, close by to the apartment, with a young child in his arms. This child is described as being about three to four years of age with blonde hair, possibly wearing pyjamas, and the man is a white man with dark hair.

"If this is you, and you are nothing to do with Madeleine's disappearance, then we really need to speak to you. It's so important for us to eliminate innocent sightings. But equally if anybody is looking at those e-fits and recognises the person, for whatever reason, then please have the courage to call in and tell us."
http://news.stv.tv/scotland/243276-madeleine-mccann-suspect-was-seen-carrying-young-child-away-from-resort/

This is beginning to have about it the ring of The Court Jester:

"The pellet with the poison's in the vessel with the pestle; the chalice from the palace has the brew that is true!"

[Carana]

This is beginning to have about it the ring of The Court Jester:

"The pellet with the poison's in the vessel with the pestle; the chalice from the palace has the brew that is true!"

At least it's moved on from the days of Eggman.

For Brietta: Eggman was the faceless initial PJ sketch of Bundleman/Tannerman who may or may not actually be Crecheman, although Redwood seems fairly sure that they are the same.

[faithlilly]

We don't know whether Mrs Fenn's intruder had a key or not, merely that reports suggested he had. Unfortuntely, the PJ seemed more interested in her version of crying children during the week of the disappearance - she only became an important witness after the dogs had been into 5a.

Quite right Misty we don't know if the intruder had a key.

Now perhaps you can go and tell ferryman that ?

[misty]

Quite right Misty we don't know if the intruder had a key.

Now perhaps you can go and tell ferryman that ?

Ferryman will be able to read my post on the matter.
The whole Mrs Fenn affair doesn't sit well in my mind, I'm afraid. An aged lady trying to grab the foot of an intruder as he escaped through the window.....and she's apparently unfazed by the whole event? Then there was the failure of the PJ to take a statement from her regarding the 3rd May, following her break-in......words fail me.

[Eleanor]

Okay, back On Topic please.  Any more Off Topic Posts will be deleted.

[Brietta]

Joana Morais ‏@xklamation 3 mins3 minutes ago
Do not put the new MET "suspects" photos up, they'll be echoed in the world wide media & you all know they're innocent people 2/2 #mccann

Very good advice.   

However we should remember that not one of us highly professional armchair detectives has as yet determined the exact status of the people who have been and who will be interviewed.

If necessary that will be the province of the courts if the Portuguese Prosecutor decides there is enough evidence to institute proceedings against them.

It certainly seems to question if we are witnessing a severe case of double standards suffered by Ms Morais as far as Madeleine McCann’s parents are concerned.

The Drs McCann have been investigated to the nth degree.  The Portuguese Prosecutors have cleared them of involvement in Madeleine’s disappearance.

The fact that they have been proved to be “innocent people” doesn’t appear to come into the equation as far as the internet trolls are concerned … which certainly leaves one to ponder the blog-spots, the YouTube videos, the books, the FB pages, the twitter accounts, the endless campaigns …

>>snip<<
Just weeks after Portuguese police delivered their final report on the case to prosecutors, Fernando Jose Pinto Monteiro, the country's Attorney General, announced Monday that the investigation would be shelved, following, a statement from his office said, to a "lack of evidence that any crime was committed by the persons placed under formal investigation." http://content.time.com/time/world/article/0,8599,1825242,00.html

[jassi]

Joana Morais ‏@xklamation 3 mins3 minutes ago
Do not put the new MET "suspects" photos up, they'll be echoed in the world wide media & you all know they're innocent people 2/2 #mccann

Very good advice.   

However we should remember that not one of us highly professional armchair detectives has as yet determined the exact status of the people who have been and who will be interviewed.

If necessary that will be the province of the courts if the Portuguese Prosecutor decides there is enough evidence to institute proceedings against them.

It certainly seems to question if we are witnessing a severe case of double standards suffered by Ms Morais as far as Madeleine McCann’s parents are concerned.

The Drs McCann have been investigated to the nth degree.  The Portuguese Prosecutors have cleared them of involvement in Madeleine’s disappearance.

The fact that they have been proved to be “innocent people” doesn’t appear to come into the equation as far as the internet trolls are concerned … which certainly leaves one to ponder the blog-spots, the YouTube videos, the books, the FB pages, the twitter accounts, the endless campaigns …

>>snip<<
Just weeks after Portuguese police delivered their final report on the case to prosecutors, Fernando Jose Pinto Monteiro, the country's Attorney General, announced Monday that the investigation would be shelved, following, a statement from his office said, to a "lack of evidence that any crime was committed by the persons placed under formal investigation." http://content.time.com/time/world/article/0,8599,1825242,00.html

No. The McCanns are centre stage in this affair and positively courted publicity. These witnesses may have absolutely nothing to do with the case and should not be identified until considered otherwise by the authorities.

[Brietta]

No. The McCanns are centre stage in this affair and positively courted publicity. These witnesses may have absolutely nothing to do with the case and should not be identified until considered otherwise by the authorities.

Do correct me if I am wrong.

You appear to be condoning the merciless and obscene trolling and abuse of the family of a missing child.

You are capable of recognising the human rights of others who are persons of interest in Madeleine McCann’s disappearance …? and I would point out common sense dictates that those to be interviewed most certainly do have some connection to Madeleine's case whether that be as arguido or witness.
 
There appears to be a rampant epidemic of double standards in evidence from a few quarters.

[jassi]

What rubbish you do talk at times.
I never mentioned trolling - I was talking about identifying  people in the newspapers before they have been labeled as suspects.

[sadie]

Do correct me if I am wrong.

You appear to be condoning the merciless and obscene trolling and abuse of the family of a missing child
You are capable of recognising the human rights of others who are persons of interest in Madeleine McCann’s disappearance …? and I would point out common sense dictates that those to be interviewed most certainly do have some connection to Madeleine's case whether that be as arguido or witness.
 
There appears to be a rampant epidemic of double standards in evidence from a few quarters..

 
Well spoken Brietta.

Double standards and a complete lack of empathy.

Some seem to get sadistic delight out of hurting The Mccanns, whilst defending others.



This sudden concern, never noticed before, poses the question:

Are some of the people being interviewed perhaps people on here /on Joana Morais blogspot, or friends of same?

Only asking, but there must be a reason for the sudden change IMO

[Brietta]

What rubbish you do talk at times.
I never mentioned trolling - I was talking about identifying  people in the newspapers before they have been labeled as suspects.

If I speak rubbish at times, at least I usually make the attempt to do it on topic. 

In case you hadn’t noticed the title of the thread … it is quite specific … it is about the trolls who have taken pleasure in abusing the family of a missing child.

If you read Ms Morais warning tweet to her followers … she is specific … “you all know they are innocent people.”

Read that very, very carefully ... and think about it … I have.

[sadie]

If I speak rubbish at times, at least I usually make the attempt to do it on topic. 

In case you hadn’t noticed the title of the thread … it is quite specific … it is about the trolls who have taken pleasure in abusing the family of a missing child.

If you read Ms Morais warning tweet to her followers … she is specific … “you all know they are innocent people.”

Read that very, very carefully ... and think about it … I have.[/size]

How perceptive of you Brietta

[Brietta]

Well spoken Brietta.

Double standards and a complete lack of empathy.

Some seem to get sadistic delight out of hurting The Mccanns, whilst defending others.



This sudden concern, never noticed before, poses the question:

Are some of the people being interviewed perhaps people on here /on Joana Morais blogspot, or friends of same?

Only asking, but there must be a reason for the sudden change IMO

Maybe the thought of the dossier in police hands may be concentrating minds, Sadie. 

However, IMO the message is still going out … but being presented in a more subtle form.

[misty]

Maybe the thought of the dossier in police hands may be concentrating minds, Sadie. 

However, IMO the message is still going out … but being presented in a more subtle form.

Definiitely - her tweets have suddenly become protected (since yesterday).