I'm well aware of that.
The mccanns didn't publish the e-fits, and they could have done.
They were hidden for years,the police had access to them and did nothing. Times journalists got part of it wrong, and the mccanns got their latest pound of flesh.
Now any thing else ?
For example the one off Telegraph journalist who had the gall on LBC on the Nick Ferrari program to say, there's no evidence of abduction. Ev n he didn't criticize the mccanns.
Nope!
Martin Smith said in his statement to the Irish Gardia police at the end of January 2008 that he had been approached by Brian Kennedy representing the McCanns to produce an efit, but had refused.
It must have been after early August 2008, when the files were released and Mr Smith realised he had been (honestly) mistaken to suppose that the man was Gerry, that he agreed to produce it.
By 2009 the efits were in the hands of British and Portuguese police who, themselves, waited until the
Crimewatch programme to release the efits.
And who "suppressed" what for 5 years?
Why should the McCanns have gainsaid the police by releasing efits the police chose to withhold until the
Crimewatch programme, even if they (the McCanns) were in a position to, which isn't clear (at least to me)?