Let's see what happens at the inquest.
The journalist in this case went to Brenda Leyland on the basis of a lie, I.e. the police were investigating her.
They weren't of course.
Now I'lll throw this in your court.
What would you do if Sky News had harassed your mother and subsequently she had died after considerable intrusion and public identification ?
and who gave the dossier writers the authority to do what they did ?
It certainly wasn't altruism as they are die hard McCann backers.
I will as usual try to actually answer your question, instead of employing your preferred tactics of answering with a question or diverting.
I would be extremely upset, that is without question.
I would be upset on four counts:
Grief at having lost my parent.
I would look for someone to blame, and most likely with anger at Brunt and sky news.
Then anger that she had (I am assuming) taken her own life, alone in a hotel room. That would be anger at her - suicide is an incredibly selfish act, more often than not designed to punish the living. I wonder who she was punishing?
And confusion and bafflement that she had such an incredible secret obsession. 4500. That is four and half thousand tweets about a family she did not know. That is almost as many as your posts on here.
_____________
If her name was on the dossier, and that dossier had been handed to the Met and to Leicester police, then it is technically correct that she was being investigated.
Finally, who gave the compliers of the dossier authority? The common law.
What do you imagine is going to happen at the inquest? The dossier compilers cross examined in the dock with plod waiting with handcuffs to "take them down"? If you you have watching far too much TV.
