« previous next »
Pages: 1 ... 57 58 [59] 60 61 ... 78   Go Down

Author Topic: Brenda Leyland. Coroner's Court reconvenes on 20 March 2015.  (Read 393222 times)

0 Members and 49 Guests are viewing this topic.

Alfred R Jones

  • Guest
Re: Brenda Leyland. Coroner's Court reconvenes on 20 March 2015.
« Reply #870 on: February 20, 2015, 11:25:57 PM »
Quote from: Faithlilly on February 20, 2015, 11:19:54 PM
How the mighty fall huh.!

From Bagdad to bagman for the McCanns  8(0(*
In what way is Brunt a bagman for the McCanns?  Please explain.
Logged

Offline faithlilly

Re: Brenda Leyland. Coroner's Court reconvenes on 20 March 2015.
« Reply #871 on: February 20, 2015, 11:32:03 PM »
Quote from: Alfred R Jones on February 20, 2015, 11:25:57 PM
In what way is Brunt a bagman for the McCanns?  Please explain.

Because he carries their messages  *&*%£
Logged
Brietta posted on 10/04/2022 “But whether or not that is the reason behind the delay I am certain that Brueckner's trial is going to take place.”

Let’s count the months, shall we?

Alfred R Jones

  • Guest
Re: Brenda Leyland. Coroner's Court reconvenes on 20 March 2015.
« Reply #872 on: February 20, 2015, 11:39:25 PM »
Quote from: Faithlilly on February 20, 2015, 11:32:03 PM
Because he carries their messages  *&*%£
What like "100% Madeleine DNA match" you mean? 

BTW, do you think Brenda would have agreed with your Wilde quotation?
Logged

Offline Mr Gray

Re: Brenda Leyland. Coroner's Court reconvenes on 20 March 2015.
« Reply #873 on: February 20, 2015, 11:41:21 PM »
Quote from: Alice Purjorick on February 20, 2015, 11:23:26 PM
I know but it had the desired effect  ?>)()<
Me? I would have used the buzz.

I used to save a penny ha'penny by getting off a mile from school and walking....that's the difference
Logged

Offline faithlilly

Re: Brenda Leyland. Coroner's Court reconvenes on 20 March 2015.
« Reply #874 on: February 21, 2015, 12:01:24 AM »
Quote from: Alfred R Jones on February 20, 2015, 11:39:25 PM
What like "100% Madeleine DNA match" you mean? 

BTW, do you think Brenda would have agreed with your Wilde quotation?

No I mean the ones AFTER they lawyered up.

As Voltaire so succinctly put it  “'That is indisputable,' was the answer, 'but in this country it is a good thing to kill an admiral from time to time to encourage the others.'

As to your question with regard to Brenda, don't know I never even met the gal !
Logged
Brietta posted on 10/04/2022 “But whether or not that is the reason behind the delay I am certain that Brueckner's trial is going to take place.”

Let’s count the months, shall we?

Alfred R Jones

  • Guest
Re: Brenda Leyland. Coroner's Court reconvenes on 20 March 2015.
« Reply #875 on: February 21, 2015, 08:35:08 AM »
Quote from: Faithlilly on February 21, 2015, 12:01:24 AM
No I mean the ones AFTER they lawyered up.

As Voltaire so succinctly put it  “'That is indisputable,' was the answer, 'but in this country it is a good thing to kill an admiral from time to time to encourage the others.'

As to your question with regard to Brenda, don't know I never even met the gal !
Who needs "Quote Of The Day" with you around?!  I swoon at your scholarly references. 8**8:/:  Personally though I think it likely that Brenda wasn't at all happy about being talked about and that was at least one of the  factors in her decision to end her life.  Of course, I may be completely mistaken, but we shall see.
Logged

Offline Benice

Re: Brenda Leyland. Coroner's Court reconvenes on 20 March 2015.
« Reply #876 on: February 21, 2015, 11:08:53 AM »
Quote from: Faithlilly on February 21, 2015, 12:01:24 AM
No I mean the ones AFTER they lawyered up.

As Voltaire so succinctly put it  “'That is indisputable,' was the answer, 'but in this country it is a good thing to kill an admiral from time to time to encourage the others.'

As to your question with regard to Brenda, don't know I never even met the gal !

Are you saying that as a result of the Press paying out large sums of money for printing massive lies about the MCanns  - they (the press) have now decided to become 'message carriers' for the McCanns instead?

The fact that they have recently had to pay another £55,000 to the McCanns does seem to contradict the idea of such a cosy relationship IMO.

Or do you think it's just Brunt who has apparently decided to become a 'bagman' for the McCanns?   Could you explain why he would do that?   


Logged
The notion that innocence prevails over guilt – when there is no evidence to the contrary – is what separates civilization from barbarism.    Unfortunately, there are remains of barbarism among us.    Until very recently, it headed the PJ in Portimão. I hope he was the last one.
                                               Henrique Monteiro, chief editor, Expresso, Portugal

Offline faithlilly

Re: Brenda Leyland. Coroner's Court reconvenes on 20 March 2015.
« Reply #877 on: February 21, 2015, 12:14:24 PM »
Seems even the McCann's staunch supporter Jim Gamble has changed his mind about the outing of BL

"I don't agree with publicly naming and shaming people..."

Seems he has changed his tune since last October when he tweeted this.

'Gr8 work @skymartinbrunt those who hide behind what they think is the anonymity of the net 2harass victims must face the #consequences'

I feel a distancing coming on.
Logged
Brietta posted on 10/04/2022 “But whether or not that is the reason behind the delay I am certain that Brueckner's trial is going to take place.”

Let’s count the months, shall we?

Offline Alice Purjorick

Re: Brenda Leyland. Coroner's Court reconvenes on 20 March 2015.
« Reply #878 on: February 21, 2015, 12:20:03 PM »
Quote from: Alfred R Jones on February 21, 2015, 08:35:08 AM
Who needs "Quote Of The Day" with you around?!  I swoon at your scholarly references. 8**8:/:  Personally though I think it likely that Brenda wasn't at all happy about being talked about and that was at least one of the  factors in her decision to end her life.  Of course, I may be completely mistaken, but we shall see.

I would suspect you are right. Which probably goes part way to explaining why some are metaphorically yelling "freedom of the press", "sources must be protected","what about my human rights" when really what it's about is they are sh*****g blue lights at the thought of their neighbours finding out about their nasty sides. IMO and in the nicest possible way of course.
Logged
"Navigating the difference between weird but normal grief and truly suspicious behaviour is the key for any detective worth his salt.". ….Sarah Bailey

stephen25000

  • Guest
Re: Brenda Leyland. Coroner's Court reconvenes on 20 March 2015.
« Reply #879 on: February 21, 2015, 12:45:17 PM »
Quote from: Benice on February 21, 2015, 12:24:52 PM
It certainly looks as if I'm going to have to remain in ignorance as to why you think Brunt 'carries messages' for the Mcanns.

Fair enough - that's your prerogative.

brunt and sky knew what they were doing.

Actions have consequences.

.............and we know what they were.

Logged

Offline Benice

Re: Brenda Leyland. Coroner's Court reconvenes on 20 March 2015.
« Reply #880 on: February 21, 2015, 12:55:27 PM »
Quote from: Faithlilly on February 21, 2015, 12:14:24 PM
Seems even the McCann's staunch supporter Jim Gamble has changed his mind about the outing of BL

"I don't agree with publicly naming and shaming people..."

Seems he has changed his tune since last October when he tweeted this.

'Gr8 work @skymartinbrunt those who hide behind what they think is the anonymity of the net 2harass victims must face the #consequences'

I feel a distancing coming on.

I believe his first remark was made specifically in the context of paedaphiles being publically named.   His argument being that the result of that was that they would 'go underground' thus making it more difficult for them to be monitored.  It was his opinion that this was not in the best interests of the protection of children.

His remark about internet trolls who hide behind anonymity facing the consequences of their actions is a completely different subject matter.   Anyone trying to link one with the other is ignoring the different contexts.

There is no comparison IMO.
 
Logged
The notion that innocence prevails over guilt – when there is no evidence to the contrary – is what separates civilization from barbarism.    Unfortunately, there are remains of barbarism among us.    Until very recently, it headed the PJ in Portimão. I hope he was the last one.
                                               Henrique Monteiro, chief editor, Expresso, Portugal

Offline faithlilly

Re: Brenda Leyland. Coroner's Court reconvenes on 20 March 2015.
« Reply #881 on: February 21, 2015, 01:04:45 PM »
Quote from: Benice on February 21, 2015, 12:55:27 PM
I believe his first remark was made specifically in the context of paedaphiles being publically named.   His argument being that the result of that was that they would 'go underground' thus making it more difficult for them to be monitored.  It was his opinion that this was not in the best interests of the protection of children.

His remark about internet trolls who hide behind anonymity facing the consequences of their actions is a completely different subject matter.   Anyone trying to link one with the other is ignoring the different contexts.

There is no comparison IMO.

It don't think it's as clear cut as you imply.

http://www.bbc.co.uk/programmes/b052mjzl
Logged
Brietta posted on 10/04/2022 “But whether or not that is the reason behind the delay I am certain that Brueckner's trial is going to take place.”

Let’s count the months, shall we?

Offline Anna

Re: Brenda Leyland. Coroner's Court reconvenes on 20 March 2015.
« Reply #882 on: February 21, 2015, 01:21:34 PM »
Quote from: Faithlilly on February 21, 2015, 01:04:45 PM
It don't think it's as clear cut as you imply.

http://www.bbc.co.uk/programmes/b052mjzl

I listened to this discussion which was initially about paedophiles on Social media sites. However while this discussion was in process, he did say “ I don’t believe in Naming and shaming people” Whether he was referring to paedophiles(which the discussion was about) or people in general, is unclear.
Therefore we should not be saying it was either one or the other, as fact. IMO

http://www.bbc.co.uk/programmes/b052mjzl  Discussion start about 25.00 Comment about 28.00
Logged
“You should not honour men more than truth.”
― Plato

Offline John

Re: Brenda Leyland. Coroner's Court reconvenes on 20 March 2015.
« Reply #883 on: February 22, 2015, 06:53:06 PM »
Isabelle McFadden and why the doorstepping of Brenda Leyland a private citizen was wrong according to Reuters guidelines.


« Last Edit: February 22, 2015, 06:55:23 PM by John »
Logged
A malicious prosecution for a crime which never existed. An exposé of egregious malfeasance by public officials.
Indeed, the truth never changes with the passage of time.

Offline Eleanor

Re: Brenda Leyland. Coroner's Court reconvenes on 20 March 2015.
« Reply #884 on: February 22, 2015, 07:05:18 PM »
Quote from: John on February 22, 2015, 06:53:06 PM
Isabelle McFadden and why the doorstepping of Brenda Leyland a private citizen was wrong according to Reuters guidelines.



And er, um, so erm that's my erm my um opinion.
Logged
Pages: 1 ... 57 58 [59] 60 61 ... 78   Go Up
« previous next »