A Thread To Discuss Alfred's Theory in detail.

[Wonderfulspam]

Off you go Alf.

[faithlilly]

Off you go Alf.

It'll be worth taking him off ignore just to read what he has to say !

[Mr Gray]

It'll be worth taking him off ignore just to read what he has to say !

As both of you ignore not only Alfred but the truth the whole thread is pointless

[Mr Gray]

Looking at the evidence ...abduction by a stranger is the most likely reason for maddie's disappearance

[faithlilly]

Looking at the evidence ...abduction by a stranger is the most likely reason for maddie's disappearance

Why ?

[jassi]

Why ?

Because he says so - he's read all the evidence, you know.

[Alfred R Jones]

As both of you ignore not only Alfred but the truth the whole thread is pointless

Plus I don't really have a theory per se. I have an opinion on what happened and that is that Madeleine was abducted by someone who wanted to abuse her and who then killed her and disposed of her body in the environs of PdL.  It has already been proven by forensic examination of the timeline that there was an opportunity for an abductor to remove her from the apartment at some point between the time the McCanns left for dinner and 10pm.  It's the only explanation as far as I am concerned that fits all the known facts.  Perhaps a "sceptic" would like to tell us why this explanation is so utterly ludicrous, improbable and physically impossible?

[Mr Gray]

Why ?

I wouldn't bother trying to explain to a Jehova's Witness why they are wrong and it would just be as pointless explaining to you why the evidence points to abduction..although SY agree with me

[Alfred R Jones]

I wouldn't bother trying to explain to a Jehova's Witness why they are wrong and it would just be as pointless explaining to you why the evidence points to abduction..although SY agree with me

Good analogy. 

[faithlilly]

I wouldn't bother trying to explain to a Jehova's Witness why they are wrong and it would just be as pointless explaining to you why the evidence points to abduction..although SY agree with me

You are not trying to explain why I am wrong though, you are trying to explain why you are right. So on you go, I'm all ears !

[Mr Gray]

You are not trying to explain why I am wrong though, you are trying to explain why you are right. So on you go, I'm all ears !

In the same way as I am right and the JWS are wrong...but I wouldn't waste my time explaining to them...you can believe what you like...it's what happens in the real world that counts...your opinion..and mine is unimportant

[stephen25000]

I wouldn't bother trying to explain to a Jehova's Witness why they are wrong and it would just be as pointless explaining to you why the evidence points to abduction..although SY agree with me

Which members of SY agree with you ?

and do you seriously imagine all members of the police believe the McCann's tale ?

[Mr Gray]

Which members of SY agree with you ?

and do you seriously imagine all members of the police believe the McCann's tale ?

another helping of the usual rubbish from Stephen...you forgot there's no proof of abduction

[stephen25000]

another helping of the usual rubbish from Stephen...you forgot there's no proof of abduction

The rubbish emanates every time you type.

Now tell me how many members of SY believe in the 'abduction' ?

I'm keen to hear what the numbers are. *&*%£

[Mr Gray]

The rubbish emanates every time you type.

Now tell me how many members of SY believe in the 'abduction' ?

I'm keen to hear what the numbers are. *&*%£

I couldn't tell you anything as you think you know it all