Author Topic: A Thread To Discuss Alfred's Theory in detail.  (Read 79117 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline misty

Re: A Thread To Discuss Alfred's Theory in detail.
« Reply #120 on: December 01, 2014, 03:53:14 PM »
Yet again.

Prove the apartment was being watched.

and why would you watch somewhere in the broad daylight, if you intended to go in at night ???



and again, NO PROOF, the windows or shutters were open or moved.

No proof Smithman exists, either, but there we are.
You just carry on ignoring the fact SY/PJ want to question 7 people, all unknown to the McCanns, regarding the circumstances surrounding Madeleine's disappearance. The police clearly feel they have evidence or reasons to suspect them of withholding information from the original investigation.
I have a feeling many people are going to be shocked by the scale of revelations at the conclusion of all this

stephen25000

  • Guest
Re: A Thread To Discuss Alfred's Theory in detail.
« Reply #121 on: December 01, 2014, 03:54:20 PM »
No proof Smithman exists, either, but there we are.
You just carry on ignoring the fact SY/PJ want to question 7 people, all unknown to the McCanns, regarding the circumstances surrounding Madeleine's disappearance. The police clearly feel they have evidence or reasons to suspect them of withholding information from the original investigation.
I have a feeling many people are going to be shocked by the scale of revelations at the conclusion of all this

Or SY are barking up the wrong tree.

Offline sadie

Re: A Thread To Discuss Alfred's Theory in detail.
« Reply #122 on: December 01, 2014, 04:00:56 PM »
Yet again.

Prove the apartment was being watched.

and why would you watch somewhere in the broad daylight, if you intended to go in at night ???

and again, NO PROOF, the windows or shutters were open or moved.

Several witnesses to the watchers came forward.  Have you forgotten so soon?



And Steven what is the point of witness statements if deliberately disruptive people like you keep disbelieving them?


Do you come from a background of liars?   Most of us do not.  Most of us take statements at their face value unless there is just reason to disbelieve them. 


So far, neither you, nor any of your fellow sceptics have given any sensible reasons for us to disbelieve any statements by Kate and Gerry, nor by the Tapas group of friends

Offline faithlilly

Re: A Thread To Discuss Alfred's Theory in detail.
« Reply #123 on: December 01, 2014, 04:05:36 PM »
Several witnesses to the watchers came forward.  Have you forgotten so soon?



And Steven what is the point of witness statements if deliberately disruptive people like you keep disbelieving them?


Do you come from a background of liars?   Most of us do not.  Most of us take statements at their face value unless there is just reason to disbelieve them. 


So far, neither you, nor any of your fellow sceptics have given any sensible reasons for us to disbelieve any statements by Kate and Gerry, nor by the Tapas group of friends

And the picture taking at Sagres ? How does not link in ?
Brietta posted on 10/04/2022 “But whether or not that is the reason behind the delay I am certain that Brueckner's trial is going to take place.”

Let’s count the months, shall we?

Offline sadie

Re: A Thread To Discuss Alfred's Theory in detail.
« Reply #124 on: December 01, 2014, 04:16:04 PM »
And the picture taking at Sagres ? How does not link in ?
Photos were taken at Sagres of children on the beach, by an unwelcome man.


We have no knowledge whether Madeleine was amongst the photographs, but from memory, I think that the Mccann family were there.  Please correct me if I am remembering that incorrectly.


Any detective worth his salt would be interested in the man who took those photos and want to look at the situation relative to Madeleine.  Cos it could be a pointer to abduction.


I am surprised that you hadn't realised that Faith.


Offline misty

Re: A Thread To Discuss Alfred's Theory in detail.
« Reply #125 on: December 01, 2014, 04:18:17 PM »
Or SY are barking up the wrong tree.

Who would you rather put your faith in, Stephen:-
a) A team of good UK detectives who have analysed the case for over 2 years
b) The conclusion of a distracted, inexperienced co-ordinator after 3 days on the case

Take your time, I realise it's not your child who's missing.

Offline Mr Gray

Re: A Thread To Discuss Alfred's Theory in detail.
« Reply #126 on: December 01, 2014, 04:19:21 PM »
Or SY are barking up the wrong tree.

who are the PJ currently investigating

Offline faithlilly

Re: A Thread To Discuss Alfred's Theory in detail.
« Reply #127 on: December 01, 2014, 04:20:53 PM »
Photos were taken at Sagres of children on the beach, by an unwelcome man.


We have no knowledge whether Madeleine was amongst the photographs, but from memory, I think that the Mccann family were there.  Please correct me if I am remembering that incorrectly.


Any detective worth his salt would be interested in the man who took those photos and want to look at the situation relative to Madeleine.  Cos it could be a pointer to abduction.


I am surprised that you hadn't realised that Faith.

You are wrong about the McCanns visiting Sagres. That was a myth perpetrated by a tabloid article and long ago debunked and as Sagres is many miles from PDL there is absolutely nothing to tie the photographer ( even if his motives were nefarious ) to Madeleine's disappearance.
Brietta posted on 10/04/2022 “But whether or not that is the reason behind the delay I am certain that Brueckner's trial is going to take place.”

Let’s count the months, shall we?

Offline sadie

Re: A Thread To Discuss Alfred's Theory in detail.
« Reply #128 on: December 01, 2014, 04:32:30 PM »
You are wrong about the McCanns visiting Sagres. That was a myth perpetrated by a tabloid article and long ago debunked and as Sagres is many miles from PDL there is absolutely nothing to tie the photographer ( even if his motives were nefarious ) to Madeleine's disappearance.
If that is correct, then strike that pointer off the list

Now how about the other 13 pointers to an abduction?

Offline faithlilly

Re: A Thread To Discuss Alfred's Theory in detail.
« Reply #129 on: December 01, 2014, 04:39:12 PM »
If that is correct, then strike that pointer off the list

Now how about the other 13 pointers to an abduction?

So how do you think the drug growing regions tie in with Madeleine's abduction ?
Brietta posted on 10/04/2022 “But whether or not that is the reason behind the delay I am certain that Brueckner's trial is going to take place.”

Let’s count the months, shall we?

ferryman

  • Guest
Re: A Thread To Discuss Alfred's Theory in detail.
« Reply #130 on: December 01, 2014, 05:14:41 PM »
The most powerful evidence for abduction is the absence of evidence of anything else

Offline faithlilly

Re: A Thread To Discuss Alfred's Theory in detail.
« Reply #131 on: December 01, 2014, 05:16:10 PM »
The most powerful evidence for abduction is the absence of evidence of anything else

Absence of conclusive evidence ferryman.
Brietta posted on 10/04/2022 “But whether or not that is the reason behind the delay I am certain that Brueckner's trial is going to take place.”

Let’s count the months, shall we?

ferryman

  • Guest
Re: A Thread To Discuss Alfred's Theory in detail.
« Reply #132 on: December 01, 2014, 05:26:45 PM »
Absence of conclusive evidence ferryman.

Zilch!

evidence of any harm coming to Madeleine from her parents or anyone else known to her ...

stephen25000

  • Guest
Re: A Thread To Discuss Alfred's Theory in detail.
« Reply #133 on: December 01, 2014, 05:50:46 PM »
And the picture taking at Sagres ? How does not link in ?

Tell me Sadie, does standing outside a building constitute 'watching' it for the purpose of burglary or abduction.

If you do you are even more deluded than you appear.

stephen25000

  • Guest
Re: A Thread To Discuss Alfred's Theory in detail.
« Reply #134 on: December 01, 2014, 05:52:13 PM »
Several witnesses to the watchers came forward.  Have you forgotten so soon?



And Steven what is the point of witness statements if deliberately disruptive people like you keep disbelieving them?


Do you come from a background of liars?   Most of us do not.  Most of us take statements at their face value unless there is just reason to disbelieve them. 


So far, neither you, nor any of your fellow sceptics have given any sensible reasons for us to disbelieve any statements by Kate and Gerry, nor by the Tapas group of friends

So you believe they've told the truth, when they have admitted to lying.

Time to be in the real world sadie.