Is the Met feeding misinformation to the public about Op Grange?

[bros]

You really don't read, do you.

Why does Murat need to answer the same questions again dave ?

Meanwhile you excuse the actions of people who are clearly very close to you.

Because is his last chance to choose which answers are correct. Plus how do you know that this are same questions he already answered?  Police haven't touch his activities in UK nor he was questioned about.

[stephen25000]

Because is his last chance to choose which answers are correct. Plus how do you know that this are same questions he already answered?

His last chance to get things correct ?

Are you acting as judge and jury ?

[bros]

How is acting like jury or judge if you answer same question on 3 different ways during judicial police interview? It is judical proceeding, so dont take this on personal level is not going to help you.

[stephen25000]

How is acting like jury or judge if you answer same question on 3 different ways during judicial police interview? It is judical proceeding, so dont take this on personal level is not going to help you.

Who is taking it on a personal level?

It has been clear cut for years that the mccanns did not cooperate fully with the investigation.

It also seems clear cut, SY have never questioned the mccanns, yet you accept questioning of others.

Why is that ?

[Mr Gray]

Who is taking it on a personal level?

It has been clear cut for years that the mccanns did not cooperate fully with the investigation.

It also seems clear cut, SY have never questioned the mccanns, yet you accept questioning of others.

Why is that ?

You are making a fool of yourself...how do you know SY have not questioned the McCcanns...the fact that Murat has refused to answer questions is strange to me...I wonder what SY make of it

[stephen25000]

You are making a fool of yourself...how do you know SY have not questioned the McCcanns...the fact that Murat has refused to answer questions is strange to me...I wonder what SY make of it

Such a boring and all too predictable response from the person very attached to the mccanns.

 

[Benice]

Who is taking it on a personal level?

It has been clear cut for years that the mccanns did not cooperate fully with the investigation.

It also seems clear cut, SY have never questioned the mccanns, yet you accept questioning of others.

Why is that ?

Why do you keep asking the same questions over and over again when you clearly have no intention whatsoever of giving even the slightest consideration to the answers?

If you want to believe that the McCanns & Co have never been interviewed by SY - then carry on.    But unless you can come up with a credible reason why SY would not interview them - then your repetitious questioning is pointless and cannot be debated IMO.

(awaits the usual ''Prove it'' response....)
 

[stephen25000]

Why do you keep asking the same questions over and over again when you clearly have no intention whatsoever of giving even the slightest consideration to the answers?

If you want to believe that the McCanns & Co have never been interviewed by SY - then carry on.    But unless you can come up with a credible reason why SY would not interview them - then your repetitious questioning is pointless and cannot be debated IMO.

(awaits the usual ''Prove it'' response....)

So pray tell me when SY interviewed the mccanns ?

SY have never said they have. &%+((£

P.S. A thorough and professional investigation, would involve questioning all relevant parties.

 %£&)**# %£&)**# %£&)**#

[Brietta]

Now who fingered Murat in the first place ?

Remind me who wished him dead ?

You seem to think it's perfectly OK for the mccanns not to answer questions, why is that ?

No idea why the PJ took an interest in Mr Murat ... maybe part of it was the interest he was taking in them.

Among the first candidates for "fingering Murat" might be the anonymous Portuguese caller or even Inspector Pedro Varanda. 

Who knows? what we all do know is that it wasn't Jane Tanner who saw what she saw, said what she saw ... and stuck to that from first to last.


02-Processos Volume II  PJ Record 8th May 2007-
At about 20.00 the police received a phone call from a number that could not be identified, from a person with a female voice speaking in correct Portuguese, who did not want to be identified for reasons of safety. She refers to an individual who abducted Madeleine, who knows how to keep quiet and is quite close to the police. When asked who she was referring to she said it was an individual who resides in Praia da Luz, who has an English mother, who speaks this language very well, who was near the area since the disappearance of the little girl, supposedly with the intention of helping the investigation. She said this man was called Robert  ... http://www.mccannpjfiles.co.uk/PJ/ROBERT-MURAT.htm

[stephen25000]

No idea why the PJ took an interest in Mr Murat ... maybe part of it was the interest he was taking in them.

Among the first candidates for "fingering Murat" might be the anonymous Portuguese caller or even Inspector Pedro Varanda. 

Who knows? what we all do know is that it wasn't Jane Tanner who saw what she saw, said what she saw ... and stuck to that from first to last.


02-Processos Volume II  PJ Record 8th May 2007-
At about 20.00 the police received a phone call from a number that could not be identified, from a person with a female voice speaking in correct Portuguese, who did not want to be identified for reasons of safety. She refers to an individual who abducted Madeleine, who knows how to keep quiet and is quite close to the police. When asked who she was referring to she said it was an individual who resides in Praia da Luz, who has an English mother, who speaks this language very well, who was near the area since the disappearance of the little girl, supposedly with the intention of helping the investigation. She said this man was called Robert  ... http://www.mccannpjfiles.co.uk/PJ/ROBERT-MURAT.htm

Have you forgotten Lori Campbell and others ?

[Benice]

So pray tell me when SY interviewed the mccanns ?

SY have never said they have. &%+((£

AFAIK apart  from Gerry, no-one else has said they ever 'used the bathroom' in PdL.   Shall we take it therefore that only Gerry had a pee that week?

Where is your common sense Stephen?   

Why do you think that because something so patently obvious as SY interviewing the parents of a missing child, as part of the normal police procedure in missing child cases, has not been made public - then it can't possibly have happened?

Do you really think SY have interviewed no-one,  but have simply relied on people's witness statements?

SY have said they are not going to give a running commentary on their investigations.   What is there not to understand in that statement?

[Brietta]

Have you forgotten Lori Campbell and others ?

Hmmm ... suspicions appear to have been raised with quite a few folk ... but I really think the PJ inspectors would be the clincher.

[Mr Gray]

So pray tell me when SY interviewed the mccanns ?

SY have never said they have. &%+((£

P.S. A thorough and professional investigation, would involve questioning all relevant parties.

 %£&)**# %£&)**# %£&)**#

You are making an assumption...a stupid assumption...that SY have not interviewed the mccanns...they almost certainly have...but I don't expect them to tell us whom  and whom they have not interviewed

[Brietta]

AFAIK apart  from Gerry, no-one else has said they ever 'used the bathroom' in PdL.   Shall we take it therefore that only Gerry had a pee that week?

Where is your common sense Stephen?   

Why do you think that because something so patently obvious as SY interviewing the parents of a missing child, as part of the normal police procedure in missing child cases, has not been made public - then it can't possibly have happened?

Do you really think SY have interviewed no-one,  but have simply relied on people's witness statements?

SY have said they are not going to give a running commentary on their investigations.   What is there not to understand in that statement?

IMO they would have followed protocol in a missing child case and interviewed first the parents, then their friends followed by a few key British witnesses.
The Operation Grange team consist of hard nosed cynical detectives who weren't about to end up their careers with egg all over their faces ... if they had any doubts ... they would not have recommended reopening the case and they would not be following evidence in Portugal today.

IMO it is common sense to have worked that out.

[stephen25000]

You are making an assumption...a stupid assumption...that SY have not interviewed the mccanns...they almost certainly have...but I don't expect them to tell us whom  and whom they have not interviewed

Rollocks.

SY have never stated they interviewed the mccanns.

If they had, they would be none of these questions.

As the saying goes, silence is golden.