Cadaver Dog Alert Convictions without a body

[Eleanor]

Of anybody for anything.

Ad infinitum.

Oh, I don't know, Stephen.  Maybe, maybe not.  But the dogs won't have anything to do with any conviction.

[stephen25000]

Oh, I don't know, Stephen.  Maybe, maybe not.  But the dogs won't have anything to do with any conviction.

Time will tell.

I do wonder how many people will still post on here if there is no resolution to this case.

[Wonderfulspam]

Oh, I don't know, Stephen.  Maybe, maybe not.  But the dogs won't have anything to do with any conviction.

No doubt that if the paedo burglary bin man gets nabbed, his house searched, Maddies short/long sleeve pyjamas are found in his wardrobe, a cadaver dog alerts there, & he confesses to her murder, you'll still believe he's innocent.

[Eleanor]

Time will tell.

I do wonder how many people will still post on here if there is no resolution to this case.

I expect that I will still be here, Stephen.  Short of gardening and decorating, I don't have a lot else to do.  This has been a good part of my life for quite some time.

ESPECIALLY CADAVER DOG CONVICTIONS WITHOUT A BODY.

[Eleanor]

No doubt that if the paedo burglary bin man gets nabbed, his house searched, Maddies short/long sleeve pyjamas are found in his wardrobe, a cadaver dog alerts there, & he confesses to her murder, you'll still believe he's innocent.

Under those circumstances, why would I believe that The Abductor is innocent?  Even without a body.

[Wonderfulspam]

Under those circumstances, why would I believe that The Abductor is innocent?  Even without a body.

Because you believe in innocent until proven guilty.

[stephen25000]

It wasn't long ago when SY used cadaver dogs in Portugal for their 'investigation'.

Now why weren't the mccann supporters up  in arms about that ?

They also included Spaniels, used in the April Jones case.

Was it because they found nothing, and it was known they would find nothing from the start, in those 'chosen areas' ?

Mmmm.

Meanwhile the lack of forensic corroboration does not mean the dogs couldn't have alerted to a dead body.

[Eleanor]

Because you believe in innocent until proven guilty.

I would only know these details after a Trial.  And I don't think we are going to get any more incidents of slippery Police Station stairs.  So a Cadaver Dog alert wouldn't be necessary.

[DCI]

I would only know these details after a Trial.  And I don't think we are going to get any more incidents of slippery Police Station stairs.  So a Cadaver Dog alert wouldn't be necessary.

Some old colleague of Martin Grime didn't rate him much. An old poster from 3A's in 2008.

http://justice4mccannfam.5forum.biz/t1945-poacher-s-view-on-grime-and-the-dogs

[Wonderfulspam]

I would only know these details after a Trial.  And I don't think we are going to get any more incidents of slippery Police Station stairs.  So a Cadaver Dog alert wouldn't be necessary.

Even then, only what you'd get to read in a biased press, or in some incomplete & dodgy translations published by shifty low grade bloggers.

[stephen25000]

Some old colleague of Martin Grime didn't rate him much. An old poster from 3A's in 2008.

http://justice4mccannfam.5forum.biz/t1945-poacher-s-view-on-grime-and-the-dogs

Ah yes, from the purple palace.

and what exactly are this other person's credentials and success rate ?

[faithlilly]

Some old colleague of Martin Grime didn't rate him much. An old poster from 3A's in 2008.

http://justice4mccannfam.5forum.biz/t1945-poacher-s-view-on-grime-and-the-dogs

My, my DCI, an anonymous poster. Must be true ! 

[DCI]

My, my DCI, an anonymous poster. Must be true ! 

Oh didn't you know "poacher" on 3A's, he was a sceptic.

[faithlilly]

Adrian Prout is a particularly good example, Faith.  The dog alerts were in the wrong place. 

By the way, just a quick point - your avatar is spelt wrong - it should read Je suis un Charlie 

Were they JP ? We know this how ?

[faithlilly]

Oh didn't you know "poacher" on 3A's, he was a sceptic.

Was he DCI. He was still an anonymous poster and we have no way of knowing the veracity of his claims.