Poll

Do you think the judge will...

Rule case dismissed.
17 (42.5%)
Allow the claim and award substantial damages.
5 (12.5%)
Allow the claim and award token damages.
18 (45%)

Total Members Voted: 33

Voting closed: February 27, 2015, 02:50:24 PM

Author Topic: Libel trial day 14 - Statement of facts proved/not proved issued to lawyers.  (Read 146947 times)

0 Members and 3 Guests are viewing this topic.

ferryman

  • Guest
The McCanns have 30 days, as from today, to present the documentation from the High Court which authorises them to represent Madeleine in the court case.

What's your source for that?

Offline Mr Gray

The McCanns have 30 days, as from today, to present the documentation from the High Court which authorises them to represent Madeleine in the court case.

I'm sure it's all ready!

Offline DCI

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 2585
  • Total likes: 6
  • Why are some folks so sick in the head!!!
So,the book didnt harm the search nor cause Kate a deep depression  &%&£(+

Does anyone know if the McCann's were allowed to make a claim for Madeleine after-all? (ward of court issue)

http://www.movenoticias.com/2015/01/caso-maddie-tribunal-da-como-provado-danos-de-goncalo-amaral-aos-mccann/

Maddie case: Court gives as proven Gonçalo Amaral of damage to McCann

The court gave this Wednesday, day 21, as proved that the book of former Inspector of Judicial Police (PJ) Gonçalo Amaral, entitled "Maddie: The Truth of the Lie", caused damage to the parents of Madeleine McCann, missing British child in 2007, in the Algarve.

In order, the magistrate also considered that the book reproduces excerpts appearing on the process in which Kate and Gerry McCann were made defendants, in September 2007, filed in July of the following year, even though the British couple has been charged.

These elements were given as proven at trial, which began in October 2013, and will be considered for the preparation of the decision that will be communicated to the parties soon, but that has no due date.

"Damages were proven directly originated by the book," said the agency "Lusa" source close to the process, confirming that Judge Melo and Emilia Castro found as a fact that the work "has from the process information", which is a violation of the secrecy of justice.


Because according to the defense of the parents of the missing child to May 3, 2007, the book was given as ready three days after the prosecutor of the Republic of Portimão, Magalhães Menezes, had written the order of termination of proceedings against the McCanns dated notification of July 29, 2008.

In preparing the book, in which the former coordinator of the Criminal Investigation Department of the PJ in Portimão defended the thesis that Madeleine's parents were involved in the disappearance and concealment of the corpse of the child, the lawyer of the British family, Isabel Duarte, maintained that Gonçalo Amaral used unauthorized and prohibited pleadings.

The same source also pointed out that the judgment of this process sessions at the Palace of Justice in Lisbon, allowed the judge to conclude that the information contained in the book are presented "some truncated, incomplete or other missing him."

This process creeps in court for over five years, with successive postponements of trial sessions and an attempted extrajudicial settlement between the parties, which was never realized.

In 2010, in the judgment of the book sales ban and the video with the same title, produced after documentary broadcast on TVI, the court decided to keep out of the market the two products that had been injunction target of temporary withdrawal.

In October 2010, the Lisbon Court of Relationship annulled the sale prohibition sentence of the book and the video and the British couple appealed to the Supreme Court, which rejected examine the use, in March 2011.

Madeleine McCann disappeared when he was four years in the tourist village of Aldeia da Luz, near Portimao, where the family was on vacation.

Kate and Gerry McCann have always maintained the position that Maddie was abducted. The case was recently reopened by prosecutors
Kate's 500 Mile Cycle Challenge

https://www.justgiving.com/KateMcCann/

Offline Mr Gray

http://blacksmithbureau.blogspot.co.uk

 @)(++(*

Blacksmith..in denial to the end...probably close the bureau now

Offline a.baker

The McCanns have 30 days, as from today, to present the documentation from the High Court which authorises them to represent Madeleine in the court case.
thank you Montclair

Offline a.baker

http://www.movenoticias.com/2015/01/caso-maddie-tribunal-da-como-provado-danos-de-goncalo-amaral-aos-mccann/

Maddie case: Court gives as proven Gonçalo Amaral of damage to McCann

The court gave this Wednesday, day 21, as proved that the book of former Inspector of Judicial Police (PJ) Gonçalo Amaral, entitled "Maddie: The Truth of the Lie", caused damage to the parents of Madeleine McCann, missing British child in 2007, in the Algarve.

In order, the magistrate also considered that the book reproduces excerpts appearing on the process in which Kate and Gerry McCann were made defendants, in September 2007, filed in July of the following year, even though the British couple has been charged.

These elements were given as proven at trial, which began in October 2013, and will be considered for the preparation of the decision that will be communicated to the parties soon, but that has no due date.

"Damages were proven directly originated by the book," said the agency "Lusa" source close to the process, confirming that Judge Melo and Emilia Castro found as a fact that the work "has from the process information", which is a violation of the secrecy of justice.


Because according to the defense of the parents of the missing child to May 3, 2007, the book was given as ready three days after the prosecutor of the Republic of Portimão, Magalhães Menezes, had written the order of termination of proceedings against the McCanns dated notification of July 29, 2008.

In preparing the book, in which the former coordinator of the Criminal Investigation Department of the PJ in Portimão defended the thesis that Madeleine's parents were involved in the disappearance and concealment of the corpse of the child, the lawyer of the British family, Isabel Duarte, maintained that Gonçalo Amaral used unauthorized and prohibited pleadings.

The same source also pointed out that the judgment of this process sessions at the Palace of Justice in Lisbon, allowed the judge to conclude that the information contained in the book are presented "some truncated, incomplete or other missing him."

This process creeps in court for over five years, with successive postponements of trial sessions and an attempted extrajudicial settlement between the parties, which was never realized.

In 2010, in the judgment of the book sales ban and the video with the same title, produced after documentary broadcast on TVI, the court decided to keep out of the market the two products that had been injunction target of temporary withdrawal.

In October 2010, the Lisbon Court of Relationship annulled the sale prohibition sentence of the book and the video and the British couple appealed to the Supreme Court, which rejected examine the use, in March 2011.

Madeleine McCann disappeared when he was four years in the tourist village of Aldeia da Luz, near Portimao, where the family was on vacation.

Kate and Gerry McCann have always maintained the position that Maddie was abducted. The case was recently reopened by prosecutors

 
Martin Brunt ‏@skymartinbrunt

#Madeleine Believed judge ruled some McCann claims not proved, includes claim Port police stopped looking for Madeleine after book published

Offline Montclair

The newspaper reports are a perfect example of how the press works these days in order to manipulate people's opinion. They report one and only a part of the "quesito" to give the impression that the judge agrees that Gonçalo Amaral has damaged the parents. The press would never dare report the rest of the document which shows the opposite from what they have reported.

They can manipulate opinion but the verdict is what counts in the end. PR is what has always been important for the McCanns since the very beginning.

Alfred R Jones

  • Guest
The newspaper reports are a perfect example of how the press works these days in order to manipulate people's opinion. They report one and only a part of the "quesito" to give the impression that the judge agrees that Gonçalo Amaral has damaged the parents. The press would never dare report the rest of the document which shows the opposite from what they have reported.

They can manipulate opinion but the verdict is what counts in the end. PR is what has always been important for the McCanns since the very beginning.
What has the PT press to gain from manipulating Portuguse opinion in this case, pray tell?

Offline Mr Gray

http://www.movenoticias.com/2015/01/caso-maddie-tribunal-da-como-provado-danos-de-goncalo-amaral-aos-mccann/

Maddie case: Court gives as proven Gonçalo Amaral of damage to McCann

The court gave this Wednesday, day 21, as proved that the book of former Inspector of Judicial Police (PJ) Gonçalo Amaral, entitled "Maddie: The Truth of the Lie", caused damage to the parents of Madeleine McCann, missing British child in 2007, in the Algarve.

In order, the magistrate also considered that the book reproduces excerpts appearing on the process in which Kate and Gerry McCann were made defendants, in September 2007, filed in July of the following year, even though the British couple has been charged.

These elements were given as proven at trial, which began in October 2013, and will be considered for the preparation of the decision that will be communicated to the parties soon, but that has no due date.

"Damages were proven directly originated by the book," said the agency "Lusa" source close to the process, confirming that Judge Melo and Emilia Castro found as a fact that the work "has from the process information", which is a violation of the secrecy of justice.
[/color]

Because according to the defense of the parents of the missing child to May 3, 2007, the book was given as ready three days after the prosecutor of the Republic of Portimão, Magalhães Menezes, had written the order of termination of proceedings against the McCanns dated notification of July 29, 2008.

In preparing the book, in which the former coordinator of the Criminal Investigation Department of the PJ in Portimão defended the thesis that Madeleine's parents were involved in the disappearance and concealment of the corpse of the child, the lawyer of the British family, Isabel Duarte, maintained that Gonçalo Amaral used unauthorized and prohibited pleadings.

The same source also pointed out that the judgment of this process sessions at the Palace of Justice in Lisbon, allowed the judge to conclude that the information contained in the book are presented "some truncated, incomplete or other missing him."

This process creeps in court for over five years, with successive postponements of trial sessions and an attempted extrajudicial settlement between the parties, which was never realized.

In 2010, in the judgment of the book sales ban and the video with the same title, produced after documentary broadcast on TVI, the court decided to keep out of the market the two products that had been injunction target of temporary withdrawal.

In October 2010, the Lisbon Court of Relationship annulled the sale prohibition sentence of the book and the video and the British couple appealed to the Supreme Court, which rejected examine the use, in March 2011.

Madeleine McCann disappeared when he was four years in the tourist village of Aldeia da Luz, near Portimao, where the family was on vacation.

Kate and Gerry McCann have always maintained the position that Maddie was abducted. The case was recently reopened by prosecutors

Isn't this a criminal offence....is amaral still the subject of a suspended sentence.....

Offline jassi

The newspaper reports are a perfect example of how the press works these days in order to manipulate people's opinion. They report one and only a part of the "quesito" to give the impression that the judge agrees that Gonçalo Amaral has damaged the parents. The press would never dare report the rest of the document which shows the opposite from what they have reported.

They can manipulate opinion but the verdict is what counts in the end. PR is what has always been important for the McCanns since the very beginning.

That is so true.
I believe everything. And l believe nothing.
I suspect everyone. And l suspect no one.
I gather the facts, examine the clues... and before   you know it, the case is solved!"

Or maybe not -

OG have been pushed out by the Germans who have reserved all the deck chairs for the foreseeable future

Offline Montclair

What has the PT press to gain from manipulating Portuguse opinion in this case, pray tell?

There were no journalists at the court today and they just print the press release from interested parties. Lazy journalism everywhere these days.

Offline Mr Gray

The newspaper reports are a perfect example of how the press works these days in order to manipulate people's opinion. They report one and only a part of the "quesito" to give the impression that the judge agrees that Gonçalo Amaral has damaged the parents. The press would never dare report the rest of the document which shows the opposite from what they have reported.

They can manipulate opinion but the verdict is what counts in the end. PR is what has always been important for the McCanns since the very beginning.

in denial

Alfred R Jones

  • Guest
There were no journalists at the court today and they just print the press release from interested parties. Lazy journalism everywhere these days.
What specifically have they printed today then that is inaccurate?

ferryman

  • Guest
The newspaper reports are a perfect example of how the press works these days in order to manipulate people's opinion. They report one and only a part of the "quesito" to give the impression that the judge agrees that Gonçalo Amaral has damaged the parents. The press would never dare report the rest of the document which shows the opposite from what they have reported.

They can manipulate opinion but the verdict is what counts in the end. PR is what has always been important for the McCanns since the very beginning.

Same, no doubt, as the woman at the trial who said most of Amaral's book is made up was being "ironic" ...

stephen25000

  • Guest
Well reading between the lines, it looks like the McCann's are up shitte creak without a paddle in their search for money.

What a shame. 8)--))