Are there other cases of leaving children where the parents have been charged ?

[mercury]

Gerry visually checked at about 9.05 on May 3rd .... so pull the other one 

Yes he did, but just that once only, by his own admission, not regularly as some claim.

You've also stated in a post that Gerry wasn't satisified with Matt Oldfield's auditory check and that is the reason he went to do his own visual check moments after. Care to explain that?

[sadie]

Yes he did, but just that once only, by his own admission, not regularly as some claim.

You've also stated in a post that Gerry wasn't satisified with Matt Oldfield's auditory check and that is the reason he went to do his own visual check moments after. Care to explain that?

Dont you bother to read responses?  All taken straight from legal statements.

 

How disingenious jassi.

I can only find three statements.  Extracts from all three below



 

GERRY MCCANN'S STATEMENT 04 MAY 2007

As usual, every half hour and as the restaurant was near, the witness or his wife, would check whether the children were all right. In this way, at about 21.05 the witness came to the Club, entered the room using his respective key, the door being locked, went to his children's bedroom and checked that the twins were fine, as was Madeleine.

GERRY MCCANN'S STATEMENT 10 MAY 20072007.05.10

In this way he entered the children's bedroom and established visual contact with each of them, checking and is certain of this, that the three were sleeping deeply. He left the children's bedroom returning to place the door how he had already previously described, [then] going to the bathroom. Everything else was normal, the blinds, curtains and windows closed, very dark, there only being the light that came from the lounge.

GERALD PATRICK MCCANN ' STATEMENT AS AN ARGUIDO
(from DVD)

September 7/2007 16.05 to 20.50  at Portimao

On this occasion the three children were lying in their beds and asleep, he is sure of that. Moreover, he says that with respect to Madeleine she was in the same position in which he had left her at the beginning of the night. Madeleine was lying down on her left side, she was completely uncovered, that is, lying on top of the covers, with the soft toy and the blanket, both pink, next to her head,


Pity that you didn't bother to check before you made your damaging statement.

Perhaps you didn't want the truth out?[/size]

Three statements and three times he affirms that he saw the children.

Get your facts right, mercury.

Stop the disinformation.  Creating myths. 

[sadie]

Yes he did, but just that once only, by his own admission, not regularly as some claim.

You've also stated in a post that Gerry wasn't satisified with Matt Oldfield's auditory check and that is the reason he went to do his own visual check moments after. Care to explain that?

In one of his statements, Matt said that he was a bit "miffed" that after he had done a check at 9pm [listening at the bedroom window], Gerry got straight up and did his own visual check.

My words not his ... but check it yourself if you dont believe and to get the exact words.   It is in one of Matts statements.

[mercury]

Dont you bother to read responses?  All taken straight from legal statements.

 
Three statements and three times he affirms that he saw the children.

Get your facts right, mercury.

Stop the disinformation.  Creating myths.

I didn't deny Gerry Mccann's statement
I've spread no disinformation or created myths.
You haven't answered my question or refuted the fact that Gerry Mccann never made a visual check on his kids ONCE during the whole holiday.

[Brietta]

I didn't deny Gerry Mccann's statement
I've spread no disinformation or created myths.
You haven't answered my question or refuted the fact that Gerry Mccann never made a visual check on his kids ONCE during the whole holiday.

Bit of a dichotomy there.  You can't have it both ways, wonder you can't see your contradiction.

[mercury]

In one of his statements, Matt said that he was a bit "miffed" that after he had done a check at 9pm [listening at the bedroom window], Gerry got straight up and did his own visual check.

My words not his ... but check it yourself if you dont believe and to get the exact words.   It is in one of Matts statements.

But why? Seeing as it was not the "norm" to do so. Not to worry though. I'm sure it can't be that important.

[mercury]

Bit of a dichotomy there.  You can't have it both ways, wonder you can't see your contradiction.

Please help then.

[Mr Gray]

so are there any other cases  where parents have been charged...that's the title of the thread...it seems the answer is no

[pegasus]

Please help then.

Did you mean "this visualcheck on the 3rd was his only in the whole holiday" ?
Not agreeing or saying any opinion just guessing what you are saying.

[mercury]

Did you mean "this visualcheck on the 3rd was his only in the whole holiday" ?
Not agreeing or saying any opinion just guessing what you are saying.

That's  exactly what I said, or meant to say, and they are not my words, they are Gerry Mccann's words. (Madeleine Was Here documentary, 2009)

[mercury]

so are there any other cases  where parents have been charged...that's the title of the thread...it seems the answer is no

Does it matter! Seeing as in your world you thnk it is OK and dandy to leave toddlers on their own. Wonderful stance btw.
More parents should take your advice

[Mr Gray]

Does it matter! Seeing as in your world you thnk it is OK and dandy to leave toddlers on their own. Wonderful stance btw.
More parents should take your advice

It matters for several reasons....

it's the title of the thread
posters have claimed that the McCanns should have been charged..

[ uncalled for comment removed ]