Author Topic: It wasn't the first time a burglar got in via a window at the resort!  (Read 55398 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline faithlilly

Re: It wasn't the first time a burglar got in via a window at the resort!
« Reply #60 on: February 09, 2015, 11:10:36 AM »
A number of reasons,    as an escape route if caught in the apartment [the burglar escaped through the window in Mrs. Fenn's]    To distract from the fact this person had a key to the apartment [the police would think he/she got in through the window,   or to dispel  any smell from a drug used to sedate Madeleine.

If the window was open already ( I can't see the burglar taking time to open it in his desperate bid to escape ) then in Mrs Fenn's case that is more likely than not how he got in.
Brietta posted on 10/04/2022 “But whether or not that is the reason behind the delay I am certain that Brueckner's trial is going to take place.”

Let’s count the months, shall we?

stephen25000

  • Guest
Re: It wasn't the first time a burglar got in via a window at the resort!
« Reply #61 on: February 09, 2015, 12:00:37 PM »
A number of reasons,    as an escape route if caught in the apartment [the burglar escaped through the window in Mrs. Fenn's]    To distract from the fact this person had a key to the apartment [the police would think he/she got in through the window,   or to dispel  any smell from a drug used to sedate Madeleine.

Pure speculation.

That's all the abduction is.

FACT.

Offline Lace

Re: It wasn't the first time a burglar got in via a window at the resort!
« Reply #62 on: February 09, 2015, 12:14:57 PM »
Pure speculation.

That's all the abduction is.

FACT.

Well,  what a ridiculous response.

Offline Lace

Re: It wasn't the first time a burglar got in via a window at the resort!
« Reply #63 on: February 09, 2015, 12:17:39 PM »
If the window was open already ( I can't see the burglar taking time to open it in his desperate bid to escape ) then in Mrs Fenn's case that is more likely than not how he got in.

What do you mean 'if the window was open already'    I meant that the man/woman opened the window after coming in through the door,  as maybe a way of escape if caught in the apartment,   if this person was taken by surprise in the bedroom,  then the window would be a likely way of getting out wouldn't it?

Offline pathfinder73

Re: It wasn't the first time a burglar got in via a window at the resort!
« Reply #64 on: February 09, 2015, 12:25:25 PM »
Well,  what a ridiculous response.

At page 884 and the following, it was added the lophoscopy [study of fingerprints] report where only finger traces of KATE HEALY were found, namely on the window’s frame who would have been opened at the time of the disappearance.
Smithman carrying a child in his arms checked his watch after passing the Smith family and the time was 10:03. Both are still unidentified 10 years later.

Offline faithlilly

Re: It wasn't the first time a burglar got in via a window at the resort!
« Reply #65 on: February 09, 2015, 12:26:44 PM »
What do you mean 'if the window was open already'    I meant that the man/woman opened the window after coming in through the door,  as maybe a way of escape if caught in the apartment,   if this person was taken by surprise in the bedroom,  then the window would be a likely way of getting out wouldn't it?

I was talking about Mrs Fenn.
Brietta posted on 10/04/2022 “But whether or not that is the reason behind the delay I am certain that Brueckner's trial is going to take place.”

Let’s count the months, shall we?

Offline Lace

Re: It wasn't the first time a burglar got in via a window at the resort!
« Reply #66 on: February 09, 2015, 12:28:26 PM »
I was talking about Mrs Fenn.

Right ok,    I was talking about apartment 5a.

Offline Lace

Re: It wasn't the first time a burglar got in via a window at the resort!
« Reply #67 on: February 09, 2015, 12:30:06 PM »
At page 884 and the following, it was added the lophoscopy [study of fingerprints] report where only finger traces of KATE HEALY were found, namely on the window’s frame who would have been opened at the time of the disappearance.


Kate could have touched it when looking out when she found Madeleine missing,   if you fake an abduction,  you are normally intelligent enough to wipe finger prints off anything that might incriminate you.

Offline Lace

Re: It wasn't the first time a burglar got in via a window at the resort!
« Reply #68 on: February 09, 2015, 12:31:21 PM »
This is a debate about what may have happened.
« Last Edit: February 09, 2015, 06:00:24 PM by Admin »

stephen25000

  • Guest
Re: It wasn't the first time a burglar got in via a window at the resort!
« Reply #69 on: February 09, 2015, 12:32:15 PM »
This is a debate about what may have happened.

So where is the evidence ?
« Last Edit: February 09, 2015, 06:00:43 PM by Admin »

Offline Anna

Re: It wasn't the first time a burglar got in via a window at the resort!
« Reply #70 on: February 09, 2015, 12:34:03 PM »
Please refrain from disrupting this thread, with non-constructive comments.


“You should not honour men more than truth.”
― Plato

Offline Lace

Re: It wasn't the first time a burglar got in via a window at the resort!
« Reply #71 on: February 09, 2015, 12:34:30 PM »
So where is the evidence ?

You do this every time.

You asked why the window would be open if someone had got in with a key,   I give you three reasons why the window could have been opened.

Now we are back to the 'give me evidence of abduction'    which is not what this thread is about.

Offline Lace

Re: It wasn't the first time a burglar got in via a window at the resort!
« Reply #72 on: February 09, 2015, 12:36:31 PM »
Sorry Anna.

Offline Anna

Re: It wasn't the first time a burglar got in via a window at the resort!
« Reply #73 on: February 09, 2015, 12:44:53 PM »
Sorry Anna.

Thank you for your effort to bring the thread, back on topic, Lace.
“You should not honour men more than truth.”
― Plato

stephen25000

  • Guest
Re: It wasn't the first time a burglar got in via a window at the resort!
« Reply #74 on: February 09, 2015, 01:24:32 PM »
You do this every time.

You asked why the window would be open if someone had got in with a key,   I give you three reasons why the window could have been opened.

Now we are back to the 'give me evidence of abduction'    which is not what this thread is about.

Those 3 'reasons' are speculation without ONE bit of evidence to back them up.